Summary Trials in CrPC
Summary Trials under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
Meaning:
A Summary Trial is a simplified and expedited trial procedure for certain types of offenses, allowing courts to dispense justice quickly without following the elaborate process of regular trials.
Legal Provision:
Summary trials are governed under Chapter XXI of the CrPC (Sections 260 to 265).
Applicable mostly to minor offenses, such as petty theft, simple hurt, and other minor crimes listed under Schedule I of the CrPC.
The trial is conducted by a Magistrate who has the power to try summary cases (usually a Magistrate of First Class).
Characteristics of Summary Trials:
Speedy Trial: The procedure is abbreviated to expedite justice.
Simplified Procedure: Many formalities like examination of witnesses on oath are either waived or simplified.
Limited Sentencing Powers: The Magistrate can impose only limited punishments — imprisonment up to 6 months or fine up to ₹1,000 or both (Section 265 CrPC).
No Formal Charge Framing: The Magistrate may dispense with formal charge framing.
No Appeal for Some Cases: Appeals may be restricted or limited by law in summary trial cases.
Procedure for Summary Trial:
The Magistrate on receiving the complaint or police report may direct a summary trial.
The Magistrate calls the accused to enter upon the trial immediately or after such preliminary inquiries as considered necessary.
Evidence is recorded in a condensed form; strict adherence to evidence formalities may be relaxed.
Magistrate delivers judgment quickly.
Advantages:
Ensures quick disposal of minor cases.
Reduces the burden on regular courts.
Provides swift justice to victims of minor offenses.
Reduces costs and lengthy procedures.
Limitations:
Only applicable to offenses listed in Schedule I.
The accused has limited procedural safeguards compared to regular trials.
Lesser punishment limits the gravity of offense that can be tried summarily.
Case Laws:
1. State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram, AIR 2006 SC 1444
The Supreme Court reiterated that summary trial should be conducted only in those cases where the offense is punishable under summary trial provisions.
If the offense does not fall within the ambit of Schedule I, summary trial is not permissible.
2. B.K. Verma v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 851
Discussed the scope and limitations of summary trials.
Held that summary trial procedures are to be strictly confined to offenses for which they are provided.
3. Subramanian Swamy v. Dr. Manmohan Singh, (2012) 3 SCC 64
The court clarified that summary trial should not be used to deprive an accused of the right to a regular trial where the offense is serious.
4. Ranjit Thakur v. State of UP, AIR 1965 SC 1039
The Court held that summary trial must follow the procedures prescribed and any departure from it invalidates the trial.
5. Rajendra Prasad v. State of UP, AIR 1979 SC 916
Emphasized that summary trials are designed for efficiency but not at the cost of justice.
Summary Table:
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Legal Provision | Chapter XXI (Sections 260-265) of CrPC |
| Applicable Offenses | Minor offenses listed in Schedule I of CrPC |
| Trial Type | Simplified, speedy, summary procedure |
| Punishment Limit | Up to 6 months imprisonment or fine ₹1,000 |
| Magistrate | Magistrate of First Class or above |
| Appeal | Limited or restricted |
| Objective | Quick disposal of petty cases |
Conclusion:
Summary trials are an important mechanism under the CrPC aimed at delivering speedy justice in minor offenses. They help reduce the judicial backlog and ensure that minor cases do not clog the regular courts. However, the procedure must be used judiciously to safeguard the rights of the accused and maintain the fairness and integrity of the criminal justice system. Do write to us if you need any further assistance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments