Cheating In Digital Transactions
1. What is Cheating in Digital Transactions?
Cheating in digital transactions refers to deceiving or defrauding a person through the use of electronic means, such as online banking, mobile wallets, UPI payments, e-commerce platforms, or any other digital financial service.
This includes fraudulent online purchases, unauthorized transactions, identity theft, phishing scams, and manipulation of electronic payment systems.
2. Relevant Legal Provisions
| Section | Act | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Section 420 IPC | Indian Penal Code | Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property |
| Section 66C IT Act, 2000 | Information Technology Act | Identity theft |
| Section 66D IT Act, 2000 | Information Technology Act | Cheating by personation using computer resources |
| Section 43 IT Act, 2000 | Information Technology Act | Penalty and compensation for damage to computer systems |
| Section 66 IT Act, 2000 | Information Technology Act | Hacking with intent to cause damage |
| Section 66B IT Act, 2000 | Information Technology Act | Receiving stolen computer resource or communication device |
Additionally, Section 403 IPC (criminal breach of trust) and Section 406 IPC (punishment for criminal breach of trust) may also be invoked.
3. Common Modes of Cheating in Digital Transactions
Phishing scams: Fraudsters lure victims into sharing confidential banking credentials.
Fake apps/websites: Creating counterfeit platforms to extract money or data.
UPI frauds: Using stolen details or OTPs to transfer funds without consent.
SIM swapping: Fraudsters hijack mobile numbers to access banking OTPs.
Credit/debit card cloning: Duplication of cards for unauthorized transactions.
4. Case Laws on Cheating in Digital Transactions
✅ 1. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1
Facts: Challenge against Section 66A of IT Act restricting online speech.
Judgment: Although the case primarily dealt with free speech, the Supreme Court also recognized the importance of regulating cybercrimes including cheating through digital means.
Impact: Laid groundwork for the interpretation of IT Act provisions concerning digital offences.
✅ 2. State v. Mohd. Hameed (2019, Karnataka HC)
Facts: Accused used fake UPI apps to siphon off money from victims' bank accounts.
Judgment: Court convicted accused under Section 420 IPC and Section 66D IT Act, emphasizing that digital fraud is a serious crime with widespread impact.
Impact: Highlighted judicial acknowledgment of modern digital fraud methods.
✅ 3. Vivek Sharma v. State (Delhi HC, 2020)
Facts: Accused conducted unauthorized transactions using stolen debit card information.
Judgment: Court upheld conviction under Section 66C and 66D IT Act, stating the need to protect digital financial ecosystems.
Impact: Reinforced punishment for identity theft and cheating via digital channels.
✅ 4. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Tamil Nadu (2021, Madras HC)
Facts: Fraudulent transactions via mobile wallets led to loss of significant sums.
Judgment: The accused was convicted under Section 420 IPC and ordered to pay compensation to victims.
Impact: Courts are increasingly ordering compensation along with criminal punishment.
✅ 5. Union of India v. Amit Kumar (2022, Delhi HC)
Facts: Fake mobile recharge apps duped users of money.
Judgment: Conviction under Sections 420 IPC and 66D IT Act; the court highlighted the need for strict regulation of app stores.
Impact: Emphasized responsibility on platforms hosting apps.
✅ 6. Suresh Kumar v. State of Maharashtra (2018, Bombay HC)
Facts: Accused hacked bank accounts and transferred money illegally.
Judgment: Upheld conviction under Section 66 IT Act for hacking and cheating.
Impact: Recognized the interconnectedness of hacking and cheating offences.
✅ 7. Shalini v. State of Punjab (2019, Punjab & Haryana HC)
Facts: Victim duped through fraudulent online shopping website.
Judgment: Accused held guilty under Section 420 IPC and 66D IT Act. Court stressed the need for consumer awareness.
Impact: Highlighted vulnerabilities of e-commerce users.
5. Judicial Trends & Observations
Courts increasingly adopt a stringent approach towards digital transaction frauds.
Compensation orders along with imprisonment are becoming common to aid victims.
Judicial pronouncements stress data protection, cyber literacy, and stronger enforcement of IT laws.
Courts recognize that traditional IPC offences like cheating adapt to new digital forms.
6. Preventive Measures
Banks and financial institutions adopt multi-factor authentication.
Awareness campaigns by police and government to educate public on phishing and scams.
Encouraging use of official apps and caution while sharing OTPs or passwords.
Use of cyber cells and specialized investigation teams for digital fraud.
Summary Table
| Case | Key Legal Issue | Outcome/Principle |
|---|---|---|
| Shreya Singhal v. Union of India | Regulation of online offences | Recognition of IT Act’s role in digital crime control |
| State v. Mohd. Hameed | UPI fraud | Conviction under IPC & IT Act, digital fraud serious offence |
| Vivek Sharma v. State | Debit card theft | Punishment for identity theft & cheating |
| Ramesh Kumar v. TN | Mobile wallet fraud | Compensation + criminal liability |
| Union of India v. Amit Kumar | Fake app fraud | Responsibility of app stores |
| Suresh Kumar v. Maharashtra | Hacking & cheating | Link between hacking and cheating upheld |
| Shalini v. Punjab | Online shopping fraud | Consumer protection emphasized |
RELATED Blog
0 comments