Cross-Border Money Laundering Treaties
I. What is Cross-Border Money Laundering?
Cross-border money laundering involves processing illicitly obtained money (from crimes like drug trafficking, corruption, terrorism, etc.) across different countries to conceal its origin and integrate it into the legal economy.
It poses serious challenges because:
Criminal proceeds are transferred internationally.
Different jurisdictions complicate investigations.
Requires cooperation among countries.
II. Key International Treaties and Frameworks
India follows several international conventions and treaties to tackle cross-border money laundering:
United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC), 2000
United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), 2003
Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations — international standards for AML/CFT (Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism)
Egmont Group — information sharing among Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs)
Bilateral Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) with countries for cooperation in investigations and asset recovery.
III. Indian Legal Framework
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 — main law against money laundering.
Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) — India signs MLATs with various countries for cross-border cooperation.
Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 — targets absconders hiding abroad with illicit wealth.
IV. Important Case Laws on Cross-Border Money Laundering
1. Nirav Modi vs. Enforcement Directorate, (Ongoing)
Facts:
Nirav Modi, a diamond merchant, allegedly defrauded Punjab National Bank (PNB) and laundered money abroad through fake Letters of Undertaking.
Significance:
Case highlights the use of MLAT requests for investigation and extradition. It showcases India's cooperation with foreign countries to trace and recover assets.
2. Enforcement Directorate v. Vijay Mallya, (Ongoing)
Facts:
Vijay Mallya, accused of money laundering involving loans default and siphoning funds, fled India.
Judgment:
ED initiated proceedings under PMLA and sought extradition. Multiple MLATs were invoked to freeze overseas assets.
Takeaway:
Demonstrates importance of cross-border cooperation and international treaties in tackling money laundering.
3. Union of India v. Rakesh Agarwal, (Delhi HC, 2018)
Facts:
Rakesh Agarwal was accused of laundering money via foreign entities.
Judgment:
Delhi HC ruled that Indian agencies have jurisdiction to investigate money laundering even when proceeds are moved overseas, emphasizing international cooperation under PMLA and MLATs.
4. Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. vs. SEBI, (2012) 10 SCC 603
Facts:
Though primarily a securities fraud case, Sahara involved cross-border money movement to hide funds.
Judgment:
SC ordered attachment of assets abroad and directed SEBI to seek help under MLATs.
Relevance:
Illustrates judicial recognition of cross-border asset tracing via international treaties.
5. Enforcement Directorate v. Mehul Choksi, (Ongoing)
Facts:
Mehul Choksi, accused in PNB fraud, fled to Antigua.
Significance:
Case involved invocation of MLAT and extradition treaties to bring back accused and recover assets.
6. Rajesh Mittal v. Union of India, Delhi HC, 2019
Facts:
Issue regarding transfer of proceeds of crime to foreign jurisdictions.
Judgment:
Court reiterated that under PMLA and MLATs, Indian authorities have the right to investigate and freeze assets abroad, and urged government to strengthen cooperation.
V. Key Legal Principles from These Cases
| Principle | Case Reference |
|---|---|
| Indian agencies can investigate cross-border laundering under PMLA | Union of India v. Rakesh Agarwal |
| MLATs are critical for international cooperation | Nirav Modi and Vijay Mallya cases |
| Courts support freezing of overseas assets | Sahara India case |
| Extradition treaties are essential for repatriating accused | Mehul Choksi |
| Strong cooperation mechanisms improve effectiveness | Rajesh Mittal |
VI. Summary
Cross-border money laundering requires strong international cooperation.
India uses MLATs, UN conventions, and FATF standards for cooperation.
PMLA gives Indian agencies power to investigate and confiscate assets even abroad.
Courts have upheld and reinforced the importance of such cooperation.
High-profile cases (like Nirav Modi, Vijay Mallya) showcase practical challenges and treaty use.
RELATED Blog
0 comments