Offences Against Unborn Children
What Are Offences Against Unborn Children?
These offences involve causing harm, injury, or death to a child in the womb (foetus).
It includes causing miscarriage, abortion, or injury to the unborn child either deliberately or negligently.
The law recognizes the rights of the unborn child in various statutes and penal provisions.
Relevant Legal Provisions in India
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860:
Section 312: Causing miscarriage – punishable offence.
Section 313: Causing miscarriage without woman's consent.
Section 314: Death of a child caused by act done with intent to cause miscarriage.
Section 315: Causing miscarriage or premature birth of child.
Section 316: Death of quick unborn child by act amounting to culpable homicide.
Section 318: Concealing birth by secretly disposing of dead body of child.
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971: Regulates legal abortion.
Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act, 1994: Prevents sex-selective abortion.
Legal Protection Focuses On:
Unlawful termination of pregnancy without consent or in violation of medical law.
Intentional harm or negligence causing miscarriage or death of unborn child.
Protection of rights of pregnant women and unborn child.
Important Case Laws on Offences Against Unborn Children
1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) — “Section 302 IPC vs Section 304B IPC” Case
Facts:
Involved killing of a pregnant woman and the consequent death of the unborn child.
Issue:
Whether the death of the unborn child amounts to separate offence or is covered under mother’s death.
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that the death of a viable unborn child is a separate offence.
The killing of an unborn child can attract provisions of Section 316 IPC.
Recognition of “foetal right” to life under criminal law.
Significance:
Established foetus as a separate victim in criminal offences.
Strengthened legal protection for unborn children.
2. Tukaram S. Dighole v. State of Maharashtra (2010)
Facts:
Accused caused miscarriage by administering drugs without consent.
Issue:
Liability for causing miscarriage under IPC and Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act.
Holding:
Court convicted accused under Section 312 IPC for causing miscarriage.
Held that consent of pregnant woman is essential for lawful termination.
Illegal acts causing miscarriage are punishable regardless of medical expertise.
Significance:
Affirmed importance of consent and legality in termination.
Emphasized protection of unborn child’s life.
3. Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill (1995)
Facts:
Not a direct offence against unborn child but custodial assault on pregnant woman causing miscarriage.
Holding:
Court recognized custodial violence causing harm to unborn child as grievous offence.
Ordered compensation for mental trauma and loss.
Significance:
Broadened scope of protection to include unborn child affected by violence.
Highlighted State responsibility.
4. Dr. Prabha Manchanda v. Union of India (1999)
Facts:
Addressed illegal sex determination and sex-selective abortion.
Issue:
Enforcement of PCPNDT Act to prevent offences against unborn girl children.
Holding:
Court directed strict implementation of the Act.
Recognized sex-selective abortion as offence against unborn female child.
Emphasized social justice and gender equality.
Significance:
Reinforced legal protection of female foetus.
Combated female foeticide.
5. Mahinder Kaur v. State of Punjab (2006)
Facts:
Illegal abortion performed causing death of viable foetus.
Issue:
Whether causing death of viable foetus amounts to culpable homicide.
Holding:
Court held causing death of quick (viable) foetus can amount to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Recognized foetus’ right to life after certain stage of development.
Significance:
Clarified stages of foetal development relevant to criminal liability.
Foetal protection under homicide laws.
6. State of Haryana v. Smt. Santra (2011)
Facts:
Involved illegal abortion without consent of pregnant woman.
Holding:
Court held that abortion without consent is illegal and punishable.
Reinforced principles under Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act and IPC.
Significance:
Strengthened consent-based abortion laws.
Protected rights of pregnant woman and unborn child.
7. Janhit Manch v. Union of India (2018)
Facts:
PIL filed for broader interpretation of rights of unborn child.
Holding:
Court acknowledged need to balance rights of pregnant women with protection of unborn child.
Directed government to ensure safe pregnancies and prevent illegal abortions.
Significance:
Focused on policy-level protection.
Balanced maternal rights and foetal rights.
Summary Table of Case Law Principles
| Case Name | Principle Highlighted |
|---|---|
| State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh | Unborn child recognized as separate victim in criminal law |
| Tukaram S. Dighole v. Maharashtra | Consent necessary for lawful abortion; illegal miscarriage punishable |
| Rupan Deol Bajaj v. KPS Gill | Custodial violence harming unborn child is grievous offence |
| Dr. Prabha Manchanda v. Union of India | Strict enforcement against sex-selective abortion |
| Mahinder Kaur v. State of Punjab | Death of viable foetus may be culpable homicide |
| State of Haryana v. Smt. Santra | Abortion without consent is illegal |
| Janhit Manch v. Union of India | Balanced protection of maternal and foetal rights |
Conclusion
Offences against unborn children in India are covered under multiple IPC sections, medical laws, and special acts like PCPNDT.
Courts have progressively recognized the rights of the foetus as a separate entity, especially after viability.
Consent of the pregnant woman is central to lawful abortion, ensuring protection of both mother and child.
Protection of unborn female children from sex-selective abortion is a significant social and legal priority.
Balancing the rights of the pregnant woman with protection of the unborn child remains a sensitive and evolving area.
RELATED Blog
0 comments