Whatsapp Chats As Evidence In Trials
Overview
In recent years, WhatsApp chats have become a common form of communication, and their admissibility as electronic evidence in courts has raised important legal questions.
Legal Framework for Electronic Evidence in India
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Sections 65A and 65B): Provides the framework for admissibility of electronic records.
Information Technology Act, 2000: Recognizes electronic records and digital signatures.
The key requirement is authenticity and integrity of electronic evidence.
Challenges with WhatsApp Evidence
Authenticating the chat content.
Ensuring the messages have not been tampered with.
Establishing the sender and receiver identities.
Showing the relevance and connection to the case.
How Courts Approach WhatsApp Evidence
WhatsApp chats are considered electronic records.
They must be produced through proper channels (such as Section 65B certificate).
Courts analyze the context, corroboration, and technical verification.
WhatsApp messages can be primary evidence if properly authenticated.
Screenshots alone may be insufficient without metadata or corroborative proof.
Important Case Laws on WhatsApp Chats as Evidence
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Ors., (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts: The Supreme Court dealt with the admissibility of electronic evidence, including digital documents and electronic messages.
Issue: Whether electronic evidence can be admitted without a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.
Holding: The Court held that electronic evidence cannot be admitted without a proper certificate under Section 65B, ensuring authenticity and reliability.
Significance: This ruling laid down the mandatory procedural requirement for admitting WhatsApp chats and other electronic evidence in courts.
2. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2018) 2 SCC 801
Facts: The accused challenged the admissibility of electronic evidence presented by the prosecution.
Issue: Whether the absence of a Section 65B certificate invalidates electronic evidence such as WhatsApp chats.
Holding: The Supreme Court clarified that the requirement of Section 65B certificate is mandatory, but courts may exercise discretion if the parties consent or in cases of secondary evidence.
Significance: It balances strict compliance with procedural law and practical challenges in obtaining certificates, affecting WhatsApp evidence admissibility.
3. State of NCT of Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600
Facts: Although predating WhatsApp, this case established principles regarding the admissibility of electronic evidence.
Issue: The reliability of electronic records and the procedure to admit them.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that electronic records are admissible if authenticated and conforming to the law, setting the foundation for later WhatsApp evidence cases.
Significance: It remains a landmark judgment on the foundational principles of electronic evidence.
4. Thampi v. State of Kerala, (2021) Kerala High Court
Facts: A WhatsApp chat was tendered as evidence in a criminal case.
Issue: Whether screenshots of WhatsApp chats without metadata can be accepted as evidence.
Holding: The Kerala High Court held that screenshots alone are not sufficient; the authenticity must be proved through corroborative evidence such as phone records or direct witness testimony.
Significance: This case underlines the importance of thorough verification for WhatsApp evidence.
5. Sanjay Chandra v. CBI, (2012) 1 SCC 40
Facts: In this case, the Supreme Court considered digital evidence produced during investigation.
Issue: The standards for authenticity and proper collection of electronic records.
Holding: The Court emphasized that electronic evidence must be collected and preserved following prescribed procedures to avoid tampering and maintain integrity.
Significance: Reinforced the chain of custody and procedural safeguards applicable to WhatsApp and other digital evidence.
Summary of Legal Principles for WhatsApp Evidence
| Aspect | Requirement | Case Law |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | Must be proven through Section 65B certificate or corroborative proof | Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer |
| Admissibility | Admissible if authentic and reliable | State of NCT of Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu |
| Screenshots | Insufficient alone, need metadata or corroboration | Thampi v. State of Kerala |
| Procedural Compliance | Evidence must be collected and preserved correctly | Sanjay Chandra v. CBI |
| Discretion in Certification | Courts may exercise discretion in some cases | Shafhi Mohammad v. State |
Practical Tips for Using WhatsApp Chats in Court
Obtain Section 65B certificate from the device or service provider.
Preserve original devices or chat backups securely.
Use expert witnesses for forensic analysis if needed.
Present corroborative evidence such as call logs, SMS, or witnesses.
Ensure messages are relevant, continuous, and complete to avoid manipulation allegations.
RELATED Blog
0 comments