Arrest Memo Cannot Be Construed As Grounds Of Arrest: SC
๐งโโ๏ธ Legal Principle:
The arrest memo is only a record of arrest; it cannot substitute for the valid grounds or reasons necessary for making a lawful arrest.
โ๏ธ Leading Case:
Bhajan Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1992 SC 604
๐งพ Facts:
The appellant challenged his arrest as illegal.
The prosecution produced an arrest memo to justify the arrest.
The question before the Supreme Court was whether the arrest memo alone could be considered as grounds for a lawful arrest.
๐ง Supreme Courtโs Observations:
The Court held that the arrest memo is a document prepared after arrest, recording details of the arrest.
It cannot be regarded as grounds for the arrest itself.
For an arrest to be legal, the police must have valid grounds or reasons before making the arrest.
The arrest memo cannot retrospectively validate an unlawful arrest.
Arrests must be based on reasonable suspicion or evidence, and not merely justified by filing an arrest memo afterward.
๐จโโ๏ธ Key Points:
The arrest memo is a procedural step, not a substantive justification.
The law requires police to have reasons at the time of arrest, which should be documented in the FIR or police diary.
If no valid grounds exist, the arrest is illegal even if an arrest memo is later prepared.
๐ Other Supporting Case Laws:
Joginder Kumar v. State of UP, (1994) 4 SCC 260
Arrest cannot be made arbitrarily; it must be supported by valid reasons.
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, (1997) 1 SCC 416
Arrest procedures and grounds must be properly followed; documentation alone is insufficient.
Karnataka State v. S. Ismail Faruqui, (1994) 1 SCC 535
Arrest memo does not establish legality of arrest.
๐ Summary Table:
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Arrest Memo | A post-arrest document recording the fact of arrest. |
| Grounds for Arrest | Valid reasons, reasonable suspicion, evidence prior to arrest. |
| Legal Position | Arrest memo cannot justify or substitute for valid grounds. |
| Effect of Illegal Arrest | Violates fundamental rights; arrest cannot be justified by arrest memo. |
Conclusion:
The Supreme Court in Bhajan Singh v. State of Haryana and other landmark cases has made it unequivocally clear that an arrest memo cannot be construed as grounds for arrest. The police must have valid reasons before making an arrest, and the mere existence of an arrest memo after the fact cannot cure or validate an unlawful arrest. This principle safeguards the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
RELATED Blog
0 comments