Identity Cloning Prosecutions
๐ What is Identity Cloning?
Identity cloning (a type of identity theft) involves the unauthorized use of another person's personal data (name, date of birth, social security number, passport, etc.) to:
Obtain credit or loans,
Commit fraud or crimes,
Gain employment,
Evade law enforcement,
Access healthcare or government benefits.
Unlike basic identity fraud (one-time use), identity cloning involves sustained use of someone elseโs identity, often for months or years.
โ๏ธ Legal Context:
Criminalized under various statutes depending on the jurisdiction.
Often charged under:
Fraud,
Forgery,
Impersonation,
Identity theft laws (e.g., Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act in the U.S.).
Increasingly linked with cybercrime and immigration fraud.
๐ Landmark and Illustrative Cases
1. United States v. White (2005, U.S. Federal Court)
โ Facts:
Barry White assumed the identity of a deceased person for 15+ years.
Used the fake identity to get credit cards, a driverโs license, and even a job.
The real person had died as a child and had a โclean record.โ
โ Legal Issues:
Charged with identity theft, bank fraud, and Social Security fraud.
โ Judgment:
Convicted and sentenced to several years in prison.
The court emphasized the sustained and deliberate misuse of identity.
๐ Significance:
Classic case of โghostingโ (stealing the identity of a dead person).
Highlighted long-term use of a false identity and the harm to institutions.
2. R v. Ibezimako [2011] EWCA Crim 2931 (UK)
โ Facts:
Ibezimako used someone elseโs identity to work as a nurse in the UK for several years.
Submitted forged documents including nursing credentials, passports, and work permits.
โ Legal Issues:
Charged with fraud by false representation, possession of false identity documents, and obtaining a pecuniary advantage.
โ Judgment:
Sentenced to 18 monthsโ imprisonment.
Court rejected arguments for leniency, stating that public trust was at stake.
๐ Significance:
Demonstrated that identity cloning in employment and immigration contexts is taken very seriously.
Emphasized the danger of impersonation in sensitive sectors like healthcare.
3. Canada v. Gerald William Blanchard (2007)
โ Facts:
Blanchard was involved in global identity cloning and fraud schemes.
Used cloned identities to access bank accounts and commit credit card fraud across Canada and Europe.
โ Legal Issues:
Charged with over 60 criminal offences, including identity theft, conspiracy, wire fraud, and fraud over $5,000.
โ Judgment:
Pleaded guilty and received 8 yearsโ imprisonment.
The judge described the case as โone of the most sophisticated frauds in Canadian history.โ
๐ Significance:
Showed how cyber skills + identity cloning can scale to international fraud.
Authorities highlighted the use of technological tools to bypass systems.
4. United States v. Aragon (2012, Texas District Court)
โ Facts:
Aragon used the identity of a U.S. citizen to obtain employment and benefits while living as an undocumented immigrant.
The real individual discovered the identity theft after being denied benefits due to Aragon's activity.
โ Legal Issues:
Charged with aggravated identity theft, false use of a Social Security number, and immigration-related fraud.
โ Judgment:
Found guilty and sentenced to 3 years in federal prison.
๐ Significance:
Highlighted the intersection of immigration and identity cloning.
Victims suffered real-world consequences like credit damage and legal entanglements.
5. R v. Solanki (UK, 2009)
โ Facts:
Solanki stole the identity of another man to obtain student loans, a bank account, and a university place.
Used falsified documents and cloned identity information from the internet.
โ Legal Issues:
Charged with fraud, forgery, and using a false instrument.
โ Judgment:
Convicted and given a custodial sentence.
๐ Significance:
Demonstrated how identity cloning is used in educational fraud.
Showed that even low-tech cloning (not hacking) is prosecutable.
6. United States v. Mitchell (2014, U.S. Court of Appeals)
โ Facts:
Mitchell assumed multiple identities, using the names of living and deceased persons to get driverโs licenses, passports, and medical care.
He collected benefits under both his real and fake names.
โ Legal Issues:
Convicted of identity theft, passport fraud, and healthcare fraud.
โ Judgment:
Sentenced to over 10 years in prison due to the scale of the fraud and breach of trust.
๐ Significance:
Showed how systematic identity cloning over years is punished severely.
Use of cloned identities to defraud healthcare systems was a key factor.
7. R v. Njie (2016, UK)
โ Facts:
Njie used the identity of another UK citizen to avoid deportation and secure work.
Lived under the cloned identity for several years, committing secondary offences (e.g., driving offences).
โ Legal Issues:
Charged with identity fraud, obtaining leave to remain by deception, and perverting the course of justice.
โ Judgment:
Received 4 years in prison.
๐ Significance:
Important case demonstrating immigration control and identity deception.
The court stressed the erosion of public confidence in legal systems when identity is misused.
โ๏ธ Key Legal Elements in Identity Cloning Prosecutions
| Element | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Unauthorized use | Of personal information of another (living or dead). |
| Intent to deceive | The offender intends to cause loss, gain or mislead institutions or people. |
| Use of false documents | Including forged IDs, bank records, or passports. |
| Sustained deception | Longer-term use of anotherโs identity elevates the seriousness. |
| Harm to victim/system | Financial, emotional, or reputational harm to real person or institution. |
โ Summary
Identity cloning is a serious criminal offence involving long-term misuse of anotherโs identity. Courts treat it as a deliberate, deceptive, and often sophisticated form of fraud, and sentences often reflect the systemic damage and personal harm caused. These cases show that identity cloning is prosecuted vigorously, especially where public systems (health, immigration, or employment) are affected.
RELATED Blog
0 comments