Healthcare Billing Fraud Prosecutions
🔍 What is Healthcare Billing Fraud?
Healthcare billing fraud occurs when healthcare providers, hospitals, or organizations knowingly submit false claims or inflate bills to receive payment from government programs (like Medicare, Medicaid) or private insurers.
Common fraud types include:
Billing for services not rendered,
Upcoding (billing for more expensive services than provided),
Unbundling (billing separately for services that should be billed together),
Falsifying patient diagnoses or records,
Kickbacks or illegal referrals.
Key Federal Laws Used in Prosecutions:
False Claims Act (FCA) — 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733
Health Care Fraud Statute — 18 U.S.C. § 1347
Anti-Kickback Statute — 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b)
Stark Law (self-referral law)
Elements Prosecutors Must Prove:
The defendant knowingly submitted or caused submission of false or fraudulent claims.
The claims were material to the government’s payment decision.
The defendant intended to defraud the payer (government or insurer).
Case Law (Detailed Analysis)
1. United States ex rel. Hopper v. Anton, 91 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir. 1996)
Facts: A radiologist was accused of upcoding by billing for higher-level services than actually provided.
Ruling: The Ninth Circuit affirmed liability under the False Claims Act for submitting false claims. It clarified that billing errors with reckless disregard for truth can be fraud.
Significance: Established that knowing or reckless false billing constitutes FCA violations, even without explicit proof of intent.
2. United States v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 2013
Facts: Medco was accused of inflating drug prices and submitting false claims to Medicare.
Ruling: Medco settled for $29.3 million to resolve allegations of submitting false claims.
Significance: Demonstrates that corporate healthcare providers can be held accountable for fraudulent billing practices, including drug pricing schemes.
3. United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc., 874 F.2d 20 (1st Cir. 1989)
Facts: An ambulance company was prosecuted for billing Medicare for trips that never occurred.
Ruling: The First Circuit upheld convictions based on evidence that the company knowingly submitted false claims.
Significance: Shows that billing for services not rendered is a clear basis for fraud prosecution under federal law.
4. United States v. Skilling, 554 F.3d 529 (5th Cir. 2009)
Facts: Skilling, CEO of a healthcare company, was prosecuted for healthcare fraud involving fraudulent billing and kickbacks.
Ruling: The court upheld convictions and clarified elements of intent and materiality under the healthcare fraud statute.
Significance: Highlights executive liability and the importance of intent in billing fraud cases.
5. United States ex rel. Moldovan v. City of New York, 2015
Facts: A whistleblower alleged a hospital submitted false claims for unnecessary medical procedures.
Ruling: The case settled for $8.75 million, with courts emphasizing whistleblower protections and the False Claims Act’s power to expose fraud.
Significance: Illustrates how qui tam actions (whistleblower lawsuits) are crucial tools in prosecuting healthcare billing fraud.
6. United States v. Prabhu, 442 F.3d 647 (8th Cir. 2006)
Facts: A physician was prosecuted for billing Medicare for unnecessary cardiac procedures.
Ruling: The Eighth Circuit affirmed the conviction, stating that submitting claims for medically unnecessary services is fraudulent.
Significance: Confirms that fraud extends beyond outright false documentation to include medically unnecessary but billed services.
Summary of Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Knowingly submitting false claims is illegal | Includes billing for services not rendered or upcoding. |
| Intent or reckless disregard suffices | Fraud does not require explicit proof of intent in all cases. |
| Whistleblower lawsuits play a big role | Qui tam suits can trigger investigations and settlements. |
| Corporate and individual liability | Both companies and executives can face prosecution. |
| Fraud includes medically unnecessary services | Billing for such services violates fraud statutes. |
Common Penalties in Healthcare Billing Fraud:
Fines up to $500,000 or more per violation.
Criminal charges leading to imprisonment.
Exclusion from federal healthcare programs.
Civil damages up to three times the government’s loss under the False Claims Act.
RELATED Blog
0 comments