Firearms Offences In The Uk
Firearms Offences in the UK – Detailed Explanation
Firearms offences in the UK are primarily governed by:
Firearms Act 1968 (as amended by Firearms (Amendment) Acts 1988 and 1997)
Violent Crime and Firearms Offences Act 1997
Criminal Justice Act 1988 (certain provisions)
Key Principles
Strict regulation: UK firearms laws are among the strictest in the world.
Definition of firearm: Any lethal weapon capable of discharging a shot, bullet, or other missile.
Prohibited firearms: Automatic weapons, handguns (with some exceptions), and firearms with specific modifications.
Offences cover: Possession, discharge, manufacturing, sale, transfer, and trafficking.
Types of Firearms Offences
Unlawful possession of a firearm – Sections 1 & 5 Firearms Act 1968
Possession with intent to endanger life or commit crime – Section 16 Firearms Act 1968
Unlawful manufacture or sale – Sections 2 & 5
Carrying firearms in public – Section 16 & 16A
Possession of imitation or prohibited firearms – Section 36(1) & (2)
Case Law
1. R v. Lambert [2001] UKHL 37
Facts: Defendant found with loaded revolver; claimed lawful possession for self-defence.
Decision: House of Lords clarified the burden of proof in firearm possession cases; prosecution must prove unlawful possession beyond reasonable doubt, but lawful authority is a defense.
Significance: Established interpretation of Section 5 Firearms Act and defenses.
2. R v. Hussey [2008] EWCA Crim 2240
Facts: Defendant convicted for possession of a prohibited firearm (automatic rifle).
Decision: Court held intentional possession is sufficient; knowledge of illegality is presumed unless evidence to the contrary.
Significance: Reinforced strict liability nature of prohibited firearms possession.
3. R v. Sangha [2013] EWCA Crim 1155
Facts: Offender involved in gang-related firearm discharge in public.
Decision: Conviction upheld for reckless discharge of firearm in public under Section 16A.
Significance: Courts emphasize public safety and deterrence, and that recklessness can constitute an offence even without intent to kill.
4. R v. Johnson [2015] EWCA Crim 467
Facts: Defendant sold unlicensed handguns to third parties.
Decision: Conviction under Section 5 Firearms Act upheld; courts stressed trafficking and distribution offences attract severe penalties.
Significance: Shows how supply and distribution of firearms are heavily penalized.
5. R v. Banks [2010] EWCA Crim 190
Facts: Accused possessed a shotgun without license; claimed it was inherited and unaware of licensing requirement.
Decision: Court held that ignorance is not a valid defense for Section 1 & 5 offences.
Significance: Illustrates the strict liability principle in UK firearms law.
6. R v. Clegg [1995] 1 WLR 79
Facts: Soldier fired a gun in Northern Ireland during conflict; charged with unlawful killing.
Decision: Conviction clarified scope of lawful use of firearms for military or law enforcement; civilian possession differs from authorized personnel.
Significance: Differentiates civilian vs authorized use of firearms under UK law.
7. R v. Haines [2018] EWCA Crim 1874
Facts: Defendant found with imitation firearm used in robbery.
Decision: Conviction under Section 36 Firearms Act upheld; imitation weapons intended to cause fear are treated seriously.
Significance: Courts treat imitation firearms as capable of committing offences; the fear induced matters legally.
Key Points from Case Law
Strict liability: For most firearms offences, knowledge or intent is less important; possession itself is often sufficient (R v. Hussey, R v. Banks).
Defense of lawful authority: Certain exceptions exist for self-defense, law enforcement, and licensed use (R v. Lambert, R v. Clegg).
Public safety priority: Reckless use or carrying in public is heavily penalized (R v. Sangha).
Supply and trafficking: Selling, distributing, or importing firearms without license attracts severe penalties (R v. Johnson).
Imitation firearms: Treated seriously if intended to intimidate or facilitate crime (R v. Haines).
RELATED Blog
0 comments