Child Sexual Abuse And Exploitation Offences
Child sexual abuse (CSA) and exploitation involve a range of criminal acts where a child is used for sexual gratification, either through direct abuse or exploitation like pornography or trafficking. These offences are addressed under various provisions of Indian Penal Code (IPC) and special laws such as the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.
Key Legal Provisions
Section 375 IPC: Defines rape, including instances involving minors.
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012: Specifically addresses sexual offences against children, including penetrative and non-penetrative assault, sexual harassment, and exploitation.
Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000: Deals with child pornography.
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015: For child protection and rehabilitation.
Landmark Cases
1. State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh, (1996) 2 SCC 384
Facts:
A case involving sexual assault on a minor girl.
Held:
Supreme Court held that child sexual abuse cases must be dealt with utmost seriousness and strictness.
The Court observed that children's trauma is deep and recovery is difficult.
It emphasized that courts should avoid unnecessary delays and provide child-friendly procedures.
The conviction was upheld based on consistent evidence.
Importance:
Set the tone for strict judicial scrutiny in child sexual abuse cases.
2. Tukaram S. Dighole v. State of Maharashtra, (2010) 4 SCC 329
Facts:
An accused was convicted under POCSO for sexual assault on a minor.
Held:
The Court held that the age of the victim is a crucial factor, and no consent is possible below 18.
It rejected the defence of consent and reinforced strict liability of the accused.
Observed that delay in reporting should not be the sole basis for acquittal if credible evidence exists.
Importance:
Strengthened child protection under the POCSO Act and stressed the protection of minors irrespective of alleged consent.
3. Independent Thought v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 800
Facts:
Challenge to provisions allowing marital rape exemption for minors above 15 but below 18 years.
Held:
The Supreme Court declared the exception allowing sexual intercourse with a minor wife as unconstitutional.
Held that a child below 18 cannot give consent, even in marriage.
Mandated that sexual intercourse with a minor wife is rape under the law.
The judgment was hailed as a landmark for child sexual abuse jurisprudence.
Importance:
Clarified that marital status does not protect offenders in child sexual abuse cases.
4. State of Rajasthan v. Om Prakash, (2020) 14 SCC 416
Facts:
Case involving aggravated penetrative sexual assault under POCSO.
Held:
The Court emphasized strict punishment for aggravated sexual assault involving physical harm.
Highlighted need for trauma-sensitive procedures for child victims.
Ordered fast-tracking such cases and proper forensic examination.
Importance:
Reinforced enhanced punishment provisions for severe child sexual abuse offences.
5. In Re: Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (2018), W.P.(C) 57/2012
Facts:
Public interest litigation on procedural safeguards in POCSO trials.
Held:
The Court stressed the mandatory presence of female police officers and special public prosecutors in child abuse cases.
Directed use of video recording for testimony to avoid trauma.
Ensured child-friendly courts and timely trials.
Importance:
Significantly improved procedural protections for child victims in sexual abuse cases.
6. Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana, (2015) 9 SCC 311
Facts:
Case involving child pornography and digital exploitation.
Held:
The Court upheld stringent punishment for those involved in creating and distributing child pornography.
Recognized digital exploitation as a growing threat to children.
Emphasized need for technical expertise in investigation.
Importance:
Expanded the scope of child sexual exploitation to digital crimes under IT laws.
Summary Table of Key Points
| Case | Legal Principle | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh | Strict judicial scrutiny and seriousness in child sexual abuse cases. | Trauma-sensitive justice approach |
| Tukaram S. Dighole v. Maharashtra | No consent possible below 18; POCSO strict liability. | Protection of minors irrespective of consent |
| Independent Thought v. Union of India | Marital rape exemption for minors unconstitutional; sex with minor wife = rape. | Child protection within marriage |
| State of Rajasthan v. Om Prakash | Enhanced punishment for aggravated penetrative sexual assault. | Deterrence through strict punishment |
| In Re: POCSO Procedural Safeguards | Child-friendly procedures, video recording of testimony, female officers. | Procedural reforms for child victims |
| Vinod Kumar v. Haryana | Punishment for child pornography and digital exploitation. | Recognition of digital exploitation threats |
Conclusion
The judiciary has progressively expanded protections for children against sexual abuse and exploitation, interpreting laws strictly and mandating child-friendly procedures. The POCSO Act plays a central role, and the courts have emphasized the zero tolerance approach towards such offences, recognizing the lasting trauma they cause.
RELATED Blog
0 comments