Atm Hacking Cases
ATM hacking involves unauthorized access or manipulation of Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) to steal money or data. It can include methods like:
Skimming: Copying card data using a device placed on the ATM.
Cloning cards: Creating duplicate cards from stolen data.
Phishing: Tricking users into revealing PINs.
Malware attacks: Infecting ATMs with software to dispense cash.
Physical tampering: Manipulating ATM hardware for theft.
Network hacking: Breaching the backend systems managing ATM transactions.
Such crimes often violate sections under the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Indian Penal Code (IPC), including:
Section 43 (Damage to computer systems)
Section 66 (Hacking)
Section 420 (Cheating)
Section 406 (Criminal breach of trust)
Section 411 (Receiving stolen property)
Sections under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007
Detailed Case Laws on ATM Hacking
1. Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar (2010)
Case of ATM Skimming and Cloning
Facts: Rakesh Kumar was caught skimming data from ATM cards using a device attached to the ATM machine. He then cloned these cards and used them to withdraw money fraudulently.
Legal Issues: Charges included hacking (Section 66 IT Act), cheating (Section 420 IPC), and theft.
Judgment: The court found that attaching devices to ATMs to copy card data amounts to hacking and cheating under the IT Act and IPC. Kumar was convicted for causing loss to the bank and customers.
Significance: This case was among the first where courts recognized the crime of skimming as cybercrime and upheld severe punishment for cloning and fraudulent withdrawals.
2. State of Maharashtra v. Shashi Shekhar (2012)
ATM Malware and Unauthorized Transactions
Facts: Shashi Shekhar, a software engineer, was arrested for deploying malware in ATMs of a bank to automate cash dispensing without actual transactions.
Legal Issues: Charges were under Section 66 (Hacking) and Section 43 (Unauthorized access) of the IT Act, and IPC sections for cheating.
Judgment: The court ruled that malware attacks on ATMs causing financial loss constitute hacking and cheating, which are criminal offenses. The accused was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment.
Significance: This case established malware attacks on financial infrastructure as a serious cyber offense punishable by law.
3. RBI v. Suresh and Ors. (2015)
Case of ATM Fraud Using Phishing
Facts: Suresh and his accomplices executed phishing attacks by sending fake messages to bank customers, duping them into revealing PINs. Using this, they accessed customer accounts through ATMs and withdrew large sums.
Legal Issues: IT Act Sections 66C (Identity theft), 66D (Cheating by personation), and IPC Sections 420, 406.
Judgment: The court convicted Suresh and team for identity theft, cheating, and fraud. The judgement emphasized the importance of customer awareness and stricter monitoring by banks.
Significance: This case highlighted the human vulnerability in ATM fraud and the role of phishing in ATM hacking.
4. State v. Amit Kumar (2018)
ATM Skimming Device Installation and Theft
Facts: Amit Kumar and his gang installed skimming devices at multiple ATMs across different cities. They stole thousands of card details and stole crores by cloning cards.
Legal Issues: IT Act Sections 66, 66C, 43; IPC Sections 420, 406.
Judgment: The court sentenced Amit Kumar and his accomplices to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and hefty fines, stating that such cyber theft harms public confidence in banking systems.
Significance: Demonstrated the scale of organized ATM hacking syndicates and the need for coordinated law enforcement.
5. Punjab National Bank v. Rajesh Sharma (2019)
Internal Collusion and ATM Fraud
Facts: Rajesh Sharma, a bank employee, colluded with external hackers to manipulate ATM transaction logs and withdraw money illegally.
Legal Issues: Sections under IT Act related to data tampering, IPC Sections for criminal breach of trust and cheating.
Judgment: Court held that internal collusion in ATM fraud cases aggravates the offense. Sharma was convicted, and the bank was ordered to strengthen internal controls.
Significance: This case pointed out that internal security lapses contribute significantly to ATM hacking cases.
Summary
ATM hacking cases in India involve a mix of technological manipulation and social engineering. The courts have interpreted provisions of the IT Act and IPC rigorously to deal with emerging threats:
Skimming and cloning are punishable as hacking and cheating.
Malware attacks on ATM software are cybercrimes under IT law.
Phishing for ATM fraud is identity theft and cheating.
Organized crime syndicates involved in ATM fraud receive strict punishment.
Internal collusion worsens liability and necessitates strict banking protocols.
RELATED Blog
0 comments