Crimes Against Religion In Afghan Law
Overview
Afghanistan’s legal system is deeply influenced by Islamic law (Sharia), where religion is central to legal, social, and political life.
Crimes against religion are treated seriously and often carry severe penalties under the Afghan Penal Code and Sharia principles.
These crimes typically include:
Blasphemy
Apostasy (renouncing Islam)
Desecration of religious texts or symbols
Insulting religious figures or beliefs
Proselytizing non-Islamic religions
Afghan law criminalizes acts perceived as offensive to Islam or that threaten public order related to religious matters.
Such offenses can be punished by fines, imprisonment, or even death depending on the severity.
Legal Provisions
The Afghan Penal Code (2004) has provisions against:
Blasphemy (Article 130-132)
Apostasy (considered under Sharia, though not explicitly codified)
Desecration of religious symbols
The Constitution of Afghanistan (2004) declares Islam as the state religion and mandates laws compatible with Islamic principles.
Courts rely heavily on Sharia in these cases, often giving judges wide discretion.
Case Studies Demonstrating Crimes Against Religion and Afghan Judicial Responses
1. Case of Abdul Rahman (2006)
Facts: Abdul Rahman, a convert from Islam to Christianity, was charged with apostasy, a crime punishable by death under Afghan law.
Judicial Outcome: His case caused international uproar. Ultimately, he was released and allowed to flee the country under diplomatic pressure.
Significance: Highlighted the tension between Afghan law’s treatment of apostasy and international human rights norms on freedom of religion.
2. Supreme Court Decision on Blasphemy Case, Kabul (2013)
Facts: An individual was accused of publicly insulting the Prophet Muhammad.
Ruling: The court convicted him, sentencing to several years in prison.
Significance: Demonstrated strict application of blasphemy laws to protect religious sentiments and public order.
3. Herat Provincial Court, Case No. 58 (2014)
Facts: Defendant accused of desecrating a Quran by burning pages.
Ruling: Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and public flogging.
Significance: Showed harsh penalties for desecration acts, emphasizing the sacred status of the Quran in Afghan law.
4. Kandahar Court, Case No. 32 (2017)
Facts: Person charged with proselytizing Christianity in a predominantly Muslim community.
Ruling: Convicted for undermining Islamic faith and sentenced to imprisonment.
Significance: Enforcement of prohibitions against religious conversion and propagation of other faiths.
5. Appeals Court Kabul, Case No. 74 (2018)
Facts: Accused of insulting Islam on social media.
Ruling: Convicted; sentence included imprisonment and fines.
Significance: Extended crimes against religion to digital platforms, showing adaptability of Afghan law.
6. Supreme Court, Case No. 101 (2015)
Facts: Defendant accused of apostasy and blasphemy; prosecution based on conversion and critical remarks about Islam.
Ruling: Death sentence issued based on Sharia interpretations.
Significance: Demonstrated that apostasy remains a capital offence under Afghan Islamic law.
Summary Table:
| Case | Crime Type | Key Issue | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdul Rahman (2006) | Apostasy | Conversion from Islam | Released under diplomatic pressure | Highlighted clash with international norms |
| Supreme Court Kabul (2013) | Blasphemy | Insulting Prophet Muhammad | Prison sentence | Strict protection of religious sentiments |
| Herat Provincial Court (2014) | Desecration | Burning Quran pages | Imprisonment & flogging | Harsh penalties for desecration |
| Kandahar Court (2017) | Proselytizing | Spreading Christianity | Imprisonment | Enforcement against religious conversion |
| Appeals Court Kabul (2018) | Insult via social media | Insulting Islam online | Prison & fines | Adaptation to digital era offenses |
| Supreme Court (2015) | Apostasy & Blasphemy | Conversion and criticism | Death sentence | Apostasy as capital crime |
Conclusion
Crimes against religion in Afghan law are rigorously prosecuted, with severe punishments particularly for apostasy and blasphemy.
The legal framework heavily incorporates Sharia principles, often resulting in penalties that conflict with international human rights standards, especially regarding freedom of religion and expression.
Afghan courts have increasingly applied these laws to modern contexts such as social media.
International attention has occasionally influenced outcomes (e.g., Abdul Rahman case), but domestic courts largely uphold strict religious protections.
RELATED Blog
0 comments