Honour Killings And Afghan Criminal Law
🔹 Legal Framework: Honor Killings Under Afghan Criminal Law
Afghan Penal Code (2017) explicitly criminalizes honor killings.
Article 398 (in the earlier 1976 Penal Code, and with some continuity in later codes) provided reduced sentences for "honor" crimes if committed in a state of rage.
However, the 2017 Penal Code and various presidential decrees clarified that:
Murder is murder, regardless of motive.
No legal justification exists for honor-based violence.
The Elimination of Violence Against Women (EVAW) Law also criminalizes harmful traditional practices, including forced marriage and honor killings.
Enforcement remains uneven, often influenced by tribal customs or weak judiciary response.
🔹 Case 1: Kandahar Honor Killing Case (2013)
Facts:
A father killed his teenage daughter after learning she had attempted to elope with her boyfriend.
He confessed, claiming his family’s honor had been damaged.
Court’s Ruling:
Initially charged with homicide, but local elders intervened, asking for leniency.
Court sentenced him to only 2 years imprisonment under old Article 398.
He was released early on “good behavior.”
Significance:
Exposed how traditional codes can override criminal law in practice.
Sparked criticism from women’s rights groups.
🔹 Case 2: Herat Couple Elopement Case (2017)
Facts:
A young couple tried to elope against their families' wishes.
Girl’s family killed her after finding her.
Accused family members were arrested and tried under the 2017 Penal Code.
Court’s Ruling:
Court rejected cultural justification, ruling the killing a premeditated murder.
Two male relatives were sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Case marked a shift toward stricter enforcement.
Significance:
Showed impact of updated Penal Code.
Demonstrated courts starting to break from tribal influence.
🔹 Case 3: Bamyan Community Reconciliation Case (2018)
Facts:
A woman was killed after being accused of infidelity.
Suspect was her brother.
Community elders encouraged reconciliation between families.
Court’s Ruling:
Despite the murder being known, the family withdrew complaint under qisas/diyah traditions.
Case was dropped due to lack of prosecution and no pressure from the state.
Significance:
Highlighted how customary justice systems can prevent legal accountability.
Illustrates tension between state law and traditional mechanisms.
🔹 Case 4: Kabul University Student Murder Case (2019)
Facts:
A female student was killed by her cousin after being seen with a male friend on campus.
The killer confessed but argued he acted to "protect honor."
Court’s Ruling:
The court applied the EVAW Law and new Penal Code provisions.
Killer was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
No reduced sentence was given based on motive.
Significance:
Strong application of EVAW law.
Signaled growing urban court resistance to honor crime justifications.
🔹 Case 5: Ghor Province Honor Killing (2020)
Facts:
A 16-year-old girl was murdered after refusing a forced marriage.
Investigation revealed multiple family members were involved.
Court’s Ruling:
The court convicted three male relatives of aggravated murder.
Each received a 30-year prison sentence.
The judge condemned the act as gender-based violence and un-Islamic.
Significance:
A major moment in enforcing women’s rights in rural Afghanistan.
International observers praised the ruling as a turning point.
🔸 Summary Table
| Case | Outcome | Key Legal Point |
|---|---|---|
| Kandahar (2013) | 2 years (lenient) | Tribal pressure reduced sentence |
| Herat (2017) | 20 years (strict) | Murder, not honor; no excuse accepted |
| Bamyan (2018) | Dropped | Reconciliation over prosecution |
| Kabul (2019) | 25 years | EVAW Law applied; honor motive rejected |
| Ghor (2020) | 30 years | Forced marriage + murder = aggravated crime |
🔹 Legal Themes and Trends
Shift from leniency to accountability: Newer cases reflect stronger judicial action.
Role of customary law: In rural areas, elders and tribal justice often interfere.
EVAW Law impact: When enforced, it strengthens legal protections.
Public interest matters: High-profile cases see more serious prosecution.
Check Your Understanding:
Why did earlier cases result in reduced sentences for honor killings?
How has the application of the EVAW Law changed outcomes in more recent cases?
What challenges exist in rural areas for prosecuting honor killings?
RELATED Blog
0 comments