Hazing Prosecutions In Universities
🔍 What Is Hazing?
Hazing involves coercing someone to perform humiliating, dangerous, or illegal acts as a condition of joining or continuing membership in a group—commonly fraternities, sororities, or athletic teams.
✅ Legal Elements of Hazing:
Hazing becomes criminal when it:
Causes physical harm or mental distress;
Involves forced consumption of alcohol, drugs, or dangerous substances;
Is conducted knowingly or recklessly;
Results in death or serious bodily injury.
📜 Legal Framework
State Laws: Nearly every U.S. state has anti-hazing statutes (e.g., Florida, Pennsylvania, Texas).
Felony Charges: When hazing leads to death or serious injury, it can lead to felony charges like involuntary manslaughter or aggravated assault.
University Codes of Conduct: Separate from criminal law, schools impose disciplinary actions—suspensions, expulsions, or revocation of recognition of organizations.
🧑⚖️ Key Cases in Detail
1. Commonwealth v. Piazza (Pennsylvania, 2017)
(The Penn State Hazing Case)
Facts:
Timothy Piazza, 19, died after a Beta Theta Pi fraternity hazing ritual.
He was forced to consume large amounts of alcohol and fell repeatedly, sustaining fatal internal injuries.
Brothers waited 12 hours before calling 911.
Charges:
Multiple students charged with involuntary manslaughter, reckless endangerment, hazardous drinking violations, and failure to render aid.
Outcome:
Several defendants accepted plea deals.
Beta Theta Pi was banned permanently from campus.
Pennsylvania passed the Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law, which created felony hazing charges.
Significance:
Landmark case that redefined criminal responsibility for fraternity hazing.
Spurred stricter hazing laws nationally.
2. State v. Gruver (Louisiana, 2017)
(LSU Phi Delta Theta Hazing Death)
Facts:
Max Gruver, 18, died after being forced to chug liquor during a hazing event called “Bible Study.”
BAC was 0.495%. Gruver died of acute alcohol poisoning.
Charges:
Matthew Naquin, a fraternity member, was charged with negligent homicide and hazing.
Other members faced misdemeanor hazing charges.
Outcome:
Naquin was convicted and sentenced to 5 years, with 2.5 years suspended.
Louisiana strengthened its anti-hazing laws afterward.
Significance:
First major Louisiana felony conviction in a hazing death.
Emphasized the deadly risk of forced alcohol consumption.
3. People v. Bogenberger (Illinois, 2012)
(Northern Illinois University Hazing Death)
Facts:
David Bogenberger, 19, died after a hazing ritual involving excessive alcohol at a Pi Kappa Alpha event.
Pledges were asked personal questions and forced to drink when they couldn’t answer.
Charges:
22 fraternity members charged with misdemeanor hazing.
National fraternity sued in civil court by Bogenberger's family.
Outcome:
Most accepted plea agreements and received probation.
National chapter agreed to pay in civil settlement.
Significance:
Clarified that consent is not a defense in criminal hazing cases.
Civil liability extended to national organizations.
4. State v. Braham (Florida, 2021)
(Florida A&M Band Hazing Case)
Facts:
Robert Champion, a drum major, died after a violent hazing ritual aboard a band bus called "Crossing Bus C."
He was beaten by fellow band members in a gauntlet-style ritual.
Charges:
Multiple defendants charged with manslaughter and felony hazing.
Outcome:
Key perpetrator sentenced to 6 years in prison.
Several others received lesser sentences or probation.
Florida A&M’s band program was suspended temporarily.
Significance:
Highlighted that hazing isn't limited to fraternities.
Showed that group assaults during hazing can qualify as manslaughter.
5. State v. Ellis (Ohio, 2018)
(Ohio University — Collin Wiant Death)
Facts:
Collin Wiant died in an off-campus fraternity house after inhaling nitrous oxide and being forced to engage in excessive drinking and physical exertion.
Charges:
Nine members of Sigma Pi fraternity charged with involuntary manslaughter, felony hazing, and tampering with evidence.
Outcome:
Several guilty pleas; sentences ranged from probation to jail time.
Wiant's death led to the creation of "Collin's Law", strengthening Ohio’s hazing penalties.
Significance:
Demonstrated that hazing involving drugs can be just as deadly as alcohol-related hazing.
Inspired major legislative reform in Ohio.
6. People v. Diaz (California, 2005)
(Fresno State — Water Intoxication Hazing)
Facts:
Kenneth Mortimer, a fraternity pledge, died after being forced to drink excessive water in a hazing ritual designed to mimic military-style training.
Died of water intoxication (hyponatremia).
Charges:
Leaders charged with involuntary manslaughter and hazing.
Outcome:
Defendants convicted; sentences included jail time and community service.
Significance:
Rare example of hazing death via water, not alcohol or violence.
Expanded understanding of “reckless” behavior in hazing.
⚠️ Summary Table
| Case | Victim | Main Charges | Outcome | Key Legal Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth v. Piazza | Timothy Piazza | Involuntary manslaughter, hazing | Convictions, law reform | Delayed aid = criminal liability |
| State v. Gruver | Max Gruver | Negligent homicide, hazing | 5-year sentence (partial suspension) | High BAC = proof of reckless hazing |
| People v. Bogenberger | David Bogenberger | Misdemeanor hazing | Probation, civil damages | Consent no defense in hazing |
| State v. Braham | Robert Champion | Felony hazing, manslaughter | 6 years prison | Group beatings = aggravated hazing |
| State v. Ellis | Collin Wiant | Felony hazing, involuntary manslaughter | Jail, probation | Hazing with drugs = criminal liability |
| People v. Diaz | Kenneth Mortimer | Manslaughter, reckless hazing | Convictions, jail time | Water intoxication = hazing-related death |
🧾 Conclusion
Hazing prosecutions in the U.S. have shifted dramatically over the past two decades. What was once dismissed as “tradition” or “initiation” is now seen as criminal behavior, especially when it results in death, injury, or trauma.
These cases reveal:
Consent is not a defense.
Victims often suffer silently due to peer pressure or fear of exclusion.
Courts hold not only participants but also organizers and bystanders accountable.
Hazing laws are becoming stricter, with many states introducing felony-level offenses.
RELATED Blog
0 comments