Distinction Between Hudud, Qisas, And Tazir Crimes
1. Hudud Crimes
Definition:
Hudud (limits/boundaries) crimes are considered serious offenses against God with fixed punishments prescribed in the Quran and Hadith.
These crimes include theft, adultery (zina), false accusation of adultery (qadhf), drinking alcohol (khamr), apostasy (ridda), and highway robbery (hirabah).
Characteristics:
Punishments are fixed (e.g., amputation, flogging, stoning).
Require very strict evidentiary standards (e.g., four eyewitnesses for adultery).
Often considered not subject to judicial discretion once proven.
Case Example:
Pakistan – Zina Case (Hudood Ordinance)
A woman accused of adultery was prosecuted under Hudood laws.
Courts strictly required four male eyewitnesses for conviction.
If the accused failed to provide witnesses, they could be punished for false accusation.
Highlighted the high burden of proof and harsh penalties.
2. Qisas Crimes
Definition:
Qisas means retaliation or “an eye for an eye.”
Applies to intentional bodily harm and murder.
The punishment mirrors the injury caused (e.g., retaliation or blood money compensation).
Characteristics:
Victims or heirs can demand qisas (retaliation) or accept diya (blood money).
Courts often facilitate mediation between parties.
Punishment is fixed but can be pardoned by the victim’s family.
Case Example:
Iran – Qisas Murder Case
A man was convicted of intentional murder.
The court sentenced him to qisas (death penalty).
The victim’s family pardoned him in exchange for diya.
Showed how courts implement both retribution and forgiveness principles.
3. Tazir Crimes
Definition:
Tazir crimes are offenses not covered by Hudud or Qisas.
Punishments are discretionary, decided by judges.
Includes crimes like bribery, embezzlement, minor thefts, and moral offenses.
Characteristics:
Punishments vary widely (fines, imprisonment, lashes).
More flexible evidentiary standards.
Judicial discretion plays a significant role.
Case Example:
Egypt – Tazir Fraud Case
A man was prosecuted for fraud not specified under Hudud or Qisas.
The court sentenced him to imprisonment and fine under Tazir provisions.
Demonstrated judicial discretion in punishment.
4. Case Illustrations Comparing Hudud, Qisas, and Tazir
Case A – Theft (Hudud)
A defendant caught stealing a valuable item was prosecuted.
Court required the item’s value to exceed a certain nisab (minimum value).
Four trustworthy witnesses or confession needed.
Punishment: Amputation of the hand (Hudud).
If proof insufficient, case downgraded to Tazir with a lighter punishment.
Case B – Murder (Qisas)
Defendant charged with intentional murder.
Court ordered qisas (death sentence).
Victim’s family accepted diya.
Defendant sentenced to pay compensation instead of execution.
Case C – Bribery (Tazir)
A government official charged with bribery.
Not punishable by Hudud or Qisas.
Court imposed imprisonment and fine based on discretion.
5. Legal Principles and Jurisprudence
Burden of proof is highest in Hudud cases — harsh punishments require strong, irrefutable evidence.
Qisas respects victim autonomy — family can choose retaliation or pardon.
Tazir allows flexibility — judiciary balances punishment with circumstances.
Summary Table
| Crime Type | Examples | Punishment Type | Proof Standard | Judicial Discretion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudud | Theft, adultery, drinking | Fixed (amputation, flogging, stoning) | Very strict (e.g., 4 eyewitnesses) | Minimal |
| Qisas | Murder, bodily injury | Retaliation or compensation (diya) | Clear proof of intent | Pardoning allowed |
| Tazir | Bribery, fraud, minor theft | Discretionary (fine, jail) | Flexible | High |
Quick Check:
What’s the difference in proof standards between Hudud and Tazir?
How does victim participation affect Qisas punishments?
Why is Tazir considered more flexible in Islamic criminal law?
RELATED Blog
0 comments