Police Use Of Deadly Force Prosecutions
Deadly force by police is a highly sensitive area of law balancing law enforcement’s duty to protect public safety and the constitutional rights of individuals. Use of deadly force is generally justified only when officers reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent imminent death or serious bodily harm.
Prosecutions of officers for deadly force are rare because courts give deference to officer judgment but scrutinize whether use of force was objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment (U.S.).
1. Tennessee v. Garner (U.S. Supreme Court, 1985)
Facts:
Police shot and killed Edward Garner, a fleeing suspect who was unarmed, suspected of burglary.
Legal Issue:
Can police use deadly force to prevent the escape of an unarmed, non-dangerous suspect?
Court Decision:
The Supreme Court ruled that using deadly force to prevent escape is unconstitutional unless the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to officers or others.
The “fleeing felon rule” was limited.
Importance:
Set the constitutional standard that deadly force must be necessary and proportionate, protecting suspects’ rights.
2. Graham v. Connor (U.S. Supreme Court, 1989)
Facts:
Dennis Graham was injured during a police stop where officers used force to restrain him.
Legal Issue:
What is the proper standard for evaluating police use of force claims under the Fourth Amendment?
Court Decision:
The Court established the “objective reasonableness” standard.
Officers’ actions must be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, not with hindsight.
The severity of the crime, immediate threat, and resistance are key factors.
Importance:
This standard is now central to prosecuting or defending police use of deadly force.
3. Scott v. Harris (U.S. Supreme Court, 2007)
Facts:
Officer Scott used a high-speed car pursuit tactic that caused Harris’s vehicle to crash, leading to paralysis.
Legal Issue:
Was the use of force (tactical driving) to stop a fleeing suspect reasonable?
Court Decision:
The Court ruled the use of force was objectively reasonable given the suspect’s dangerous driving.
Affirmed officers may use force to protect public safety during dangerous pursuits.
Importance:
Reinforced that public safety considerations justify certain uses of force, even with risks.
4. State v. Timothy Loehmann (Ohio, 2017) — Hypothetical Example
(Note: This is based on a real event but simplified for explanation.)
Facts:
Officer Loehmann shot 12-year-old Tamir Rice, who was holding a toy gun.
Legal Issue:
Was the officer’s use of deadly force justified given the circumstances?
Outcome:
Prosecutors declined to charge Loehmann, citing lack of probable cause to believe deadly force was necessary.
The case sparked national debate on police accountability.
Importance:
Shows high prosecutorial threshold for charging officers, focusing on reasonableness under tense, split-second decisions.
5. United States v. Officer Derek Chauvin (Minnesota, 2021)
Facts:
Officer Chauvin was charged with murder and manslaughter for the death of George Floyd after kneeling on his neck for over nine minutes.
Legal Issue:
Did Chauvin’s use of force violate Floyd’s constitutional rights and criminal statutes?
Outcome:
Chauvin was convicted on all charges, demonstrating accountability for excessive force.
The case marked a rare successful prosecution of police deadly force in the U.S.
Importance:
Illustrated that officers can be held criminally liable for unjustified use of deadly force under both criminal law and civil rights violations.
Summary of Legal Principles in Police Use of Deadly Force Prosecutions
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Objective Reasonableness (Graham v. Connor) | Officer actions judged by reasonable standards at the moment, not hindsight. |
| Imminent Threat Requirement (Tennessee v. Garner) | Deadly force only if suspect poses immediate danger. |
| Public Safety Considerations (Scott v. Harris) | Force may be used to prevent broader harm, even if risky. |
| High Threshold for Criminal Prosecution | Prosecutors must prove force was unreasonable and unlawful beyond doubt. |
| Potential for Criminal Liability | Cases like Chauvin show officers can face murder/manslaughter charges for misuse of deadly force. |
RELATED Blog
0 comments