Why Not A Single Rioter Or Guilty Policemen Have Been Hanged In The Anti-Sikh Riot Of 1984 Even After Thirty Seven...
The 1984 anti-Sikh riots remain one of the darkest episodes in India's post-independence history, with thousands of Sikhs killed following the assassination of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards. Despite decades passing since the violence, no rioter or police officer has been executed (hanged) for their role in the riots. This outcome is the result of a complex interplay of political influence, systemic failure, weak investigation, judicial delays, and flaws in law enforcement. Below is a detailed explanation, with important case law references, outlining why justice has remained largely elusive:
✅ 1. Lack of Political Will & Alleged Complicity
One of the primary reasons for the failure to convict and punish the guilty lies in the alleged political involvement and protection extended to the perpetrators.
Leaders of the ruling party (Congress) at the time were accused of inciting mobs.
Many First Information Reports (FIRs) were never registered, or were watered down.
Allegations against prominent leaders like Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, and others took decades to investigate due to political shielding.
Case Law:
⚖️ Sajjan Kumar v. CBI [(2018) 14 SCC 483]
The Delhi High Court overturned a lower court's acquittal of Sajjan Kumar in 2018, stating:
"The mass killings of Sikhs in Delhi were a crime against humanity... the accused enjoyed political patronage and escaped trial."
Yet, death penalty was not awarded due to the long delay and advanced age of the accused.
✅ 2. Systemic Failure of Law Enforcement
Police and administrative officials were not only inactive but in many cases were accused of aiding the rioters.
In several cases, police refused to file FIRs.
Deliberate destruction or non-collection of evidence.
No major convictions of police officers responsible for dereliction of duty.
Case Law:
⚖️ State v. Balwan Khokhar & Ors. (Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, 2013)
This was one of the first cases where a few Delhi policemen were convicted for involvement in the riots. However, life sentences were given—not capital punishment.
The court noted the failure of institutions, especially the police, in protecting the victims.
✅ 3. Delay in Investigation and Prosecution
Justice delayed is justice denied. A significant number of cases were not investigated promptly, and many were closed without proper inquiry.
The Nanavati Commission (2000–2005) and earlier Ranganath Misra Commission (1985) recommended action, but many suggestions were ignored or not acted upon.
Over 1,700 cases were reportedly closed due to "lack of evidence" or "untraceable accused."
Case Law:
⚖️ CBI v. Sajjan Kumar & Ors. (2013)
This case highlighted how delays of over 20 years had crippled the evidence and made prosecution difficult. Courts expressed helplessness due to fading witnesses, lost documents, and systemic neglect.
✅ 4. Challenges in Proving ‘Rarest of Rare’ for Capital Punishment
According to Indian jurisprudence, the death penalty can only be awarded in the ‘rarest of rare’ cases, as per the doctrine laid down in:
Case Law:
⚖️ Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab [(1980) 2 SCC 684]
The Supreme Court laid down that the death penalty must be awarded only when the alternative of life imprisonment is unquestionably foreclosed.
In most 1984 riot cases, courts held that though heinous, the requirements for the ‘rarest of rare’ standard were not met, especially due to:
Long time elapsed since the crime
Age of accused
Lack of direct, corroborative evidence
Delay in trial and investigation
Accused having no prior criminal record
✅ 5. Witness Intimidation & Lack of Protection
Many witnesses turned hostile or could not testify due to intimidation, migration, or death over time. Victim families were often too scared to depose against powerful individuals.
Case Law:
⚖️ Delhi High Court judgment (2018) in Sajjan Kumar case
The court noted:
“Criminals managed to escape accountability for the carnage... because of the failure of state machinery and threats to witnesses.”
Witness protection laws came much later, and during the critical early years, witnesses lacked security or legal support.
✅ 6. Special Investigation Teams (SITs) Acted Too Late
Multiple SITs were formed decades after the riots, like the 2015 SIT formed under Supreme Court’s direction.
By then, key evidence was lost, and the accused were often elderly or deceased.
The effectiveness of the SITs was limited by the passage of time and weak records.
Case Law Reference:
⚖️ Gurdeep Kaur v. Union of India – Supreme Court ordered re-investigation of closed cases, but again, capital punishment was not considered feasible due to the age and time lapse.
✅ 7. No Application of Genocide Law in Indian Penal Code
Despite the scale of the violence, India does not have a specific ‘Genocide Law’. The accused were tried under:
IPC sections: 302 (murder), 147/148/149 (rioting), 436 (mischief by fire), etc.
These do not provide specific sentencing guidelines for mass crimes akin to genocide. So even in the most severe cases, punishment remained at life imprisonment, not death.
✅ Conclusion
To summarize, no rioter or police official has been hanged for the 1984 anti-Sikh riots due to a combination of:
Political protection of key accused
Failure of the police and investigative agencies
Weaknesses in evidence due to delay
Lack of witness protection and hostile witnesses
Absence of specific genocide law
Legal threshold for death penalty not being met
Institutional apathy for decades
While life sentences have been awarded (as late as 2018), capital punishment has never been invoked because courts have held that even these horrific crimes do not meet the ‘rarest of rare’ standard under Indian jurisprudence, especially after such long delays.
RELATED Blog
0 comments