Mortgage Fraud Prosecution Research
Mortgage Fraud Prosecution: Overview
Mortgage fraud generally involves misrepresentations, falsification of documents, or deception in the loan origination, underwriting, or servicing processes, intended to obtain loans or benefits unlawfully. It can be perpetrated by borrowers, loan officers, appraisers, or organized criminal groups.
1. United States v. Taylor, et al. (2011)
Facts:
A mortgage fraud ring involving real estate agents, loan officers, and appraisers orchestrated a scheme to inflate home values, falsify borrower income, and submit fake documents. They caused lenders to approve loans far exceeding the properties’ actual values.
Legal Issues:
Charges included bank fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit mortgage fraud under federal statutes.
Outcome:
Multiple defendants were convicted; several received prison sentences ranging from 5 to 15 years, plus hefty fines and restitution orders.
Significance:
This case demonstrated federal authorities’ ability to dismantle sophisticated mortgage fraud rings that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis.
2. United States v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. (2009)
Facts:
An employee of a mortgage company falsified borrower employment and income information to secure loan approvals. The fraud was discovered during a routine audit.
Legal Issues:
The defendant was charged with bank fraud and making false statements to financial institutions.
Outcome:
The defendant pleaded guilty and received probation along with restitution payments.
Significance:
This case underscored the role of individual loan officers in mortgage fraud and the importance of internal compliance measures.
3. United States v. Samuel A. “Sam” Guzman (2015)
Facts:
Guzman led a mortgage fraud scheme involving straw buyers and forged documents. The defendants inflated property values and loan amounts, using the funds to purchase luxury vehicles and personal goods.
Legal Issues:
Charges included mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy.
Outcome:
Guzman was convicted on multiple counts and sentenced to over 10 years in federal prison.
Significance:
Highlighted how mortgage fraud can involve complex money laundering components and multiple conspirators.
4. People v. Lisa Morton (2014, New York)
Facts:
Lisa Morton, a mortgage broker, was prosecuted for submitting false loan applications with inflated borrower income and fabricated employment history to obtain mortgages.
Legal Issues:
She was charged with grand larceny, fraudulent loan application, and conspiracy under New York State law.
Outcome:
Morton was convicted, sentenced to 5 years in state prison, and ordered to pay restitution.
Significance:
Demonstrated how state authorities prosecute mortgage fraud in addition to federal efforts, especially involving intermediaries like brokers.
5. United States v. Charles “Chuck” Harmon (2017)
Facts:
Harmon was involved in a scheme where appraisers inflated home values in exchange for kickbacks, enabling borrowers to obtain larger loans they couldn’t afford.
Legal Issues:
Charges included bank fraud, bribery, and conspiracy.
Outcome:
Harmon pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 6 years in prison.
Significance:
This case highlighted the critical role of appraisers in mortgage fraud schemes and penalties for collusion.
6. United States v. Maria Gonzalez (2018)
Facts:
Maria Gonzalez, a mortgage loan processor, falsified borrower documents and helped conceal defects in credit reports to secure loan approvals.
Legal Issues:
Charged with wire fraud, identity theft, and making false statements.
Outcome:
She pleaded guilty and received 4 years in prison with an order to pay restitution.
Significance:
Emphasized the role of loan processors and behind-the-scenes personnel in perpetuating mortgage fraud.
Summary Table:
| Case | Jurisdiction | Charges | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US v. Taylor et al. | Federal (USA) | Bank fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy | Prison sentences, fines | Major mortgage fraud ring prosecution |
| US v. McDonnell Douglas | Federal (USA) | Bank fraud, false statements | Guilty plea, probation | Individual loan officer fraud |
| US v. Samuel Guzman | Federal (USA) | Mail fraud, wire fraud, money laundering | 10+ years prison | Complex mortgage fraud and money laundering |
| People v. Lisa Morton | New York State | Grand larceny, conspiracy | 5 years prison, restitution | State-level mortgage fraud prosecution |
| US v. Charles Harmon | Federal (USA) | Bank fraud, bribery, conspiracy | 6 years prison | Role of appraisers in fraud |
| US v. Maria Gonzalez | Federal (USA) | Wire fraud, identity theft | 4 years prison, restitution | Loan processor’s role in document falsification |
Final Notes:
Mortgage fraud cases involve various actors: borrowers, brokers, loan officers, appraisers, and even third-party conspirators.
Federal charges often include bank fraud, wire/mail fraud, conspiracy, and sometimes money laundering.
State prosecutions target similar conduct under local criminal statutes.
Sentences vary but can include long prison terms, heavy fines, and restitution.
These cases highlight the necessity for rigorous loan verification and anti-fraud compliance in the mortgage industry.
RELATED Blog
0 comments