La Cosa Nostra Organized Crime Studies
La Cosa Nostra Organized Crime: Overview
La Cosa Nostra (“Our Thing”) is the Italian-American Mafia—a secretive criminal organization involved in racketeering, extortion, loan sharking, drug trafficking, murder, and infiltration of legitimate businesses. The U.S. government’s primary legal weapon has been the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968, enacted in 1970 to target entire criminal enterprises rather than just individuals.
Case Studies of La Cosa Nostra Prosecutions
1. United States v. Luciano et al. (The “Murder, Inc.” Case) (1940s–1950s)
Background:
Murder, Inc. was the enforcement arm of LCN, responsible for hundreds of contract killings on behalf of Mafia families. The case focused on identifying and prosecuting these killers and their Mafia bosses.
Charges:
Conspiracy to commit murder
Murder
Racketeering (precursor statutes before RICO)
Prosecution Strategy:
Witness testimony from former members who turned informants (notably Abe “Kid Twist” Reles).
Link between organized crime bosses and hitmen through undercover operations and surveillance.
Defense Arguments:
Denied knowledge of murders.
Claimed witness testimonies were unreliable or coerced.
Outcome:
Several convictions and death sentences for members of Murder, Inc.
Weakening of LCN’s enforcement mechanism.
Legal Significance:
First major successful prosecution tying organized crime leaders to murders through conspiratorial evidence.
Paved way for future RICO prosecutions.
2. United States v. Bonanno Family (The “Mafia Commission Trial”) (1985–1986)
Background:
The U.S. government targeted the heads of the five major New York Mafia families (Bonanno, Gambino, Genovese, Lucchese, Colombo) for racketeering, extortion, murder, and illegal gambling.
Charges:
RICO violations
Extortion
Illegal gambling
Conspiracy to commit murder
Prosecution Strategy:
Key witness: Joseph “The Animal” Barboza (turned informant).
Use of wiretaps and surveillance.
Detailed documentation of the Mafia Commission’s role in coordinating criminal activities.
Defense Arguments:
Claimed defendants were businessmen with no criminal intent.
Denied existence of the Mafia Commission as a criminal entity.
Outcome:
Several bosses convicted, including Carmine “The Cigar” Persico and Paul Castellano.
Sentences ranged from 15 years to life imprisonment.
Legal Significance:
First time the Mafia Commission was prosecuted as a criminal enterprise under RICO.
Validated the use of RICO for dismantling organized crime leadership.
3. United States v. John Gotti (1992)
Background:
John Gotti, “The Teflon Don,” was the boss of the Gambino family, known for his public persona and eluding convictions for years.
Charges:
RICO violations
Murder conspiracy
Extortion
Loan sharking
Illegal gambling
Prosecution Strategy:
Secret FBI surveillance including wiretaps in social clubs.
Testimony from Salvatore “Sammy the Bull” Gravano, Gotti’s underboss turned government witness.
Evidence of meetings and conspiracies recorded covertly.
Defense Arguments:
Claimed Gotti was a businessman targeted unfairly by the government.
Argued witness testimonies were fabricated.
Outcome:
Gotti convicted on all counts.
Sentenced to life imprisonment without parole.
Legal Significance:
Demonstrated effectiveness of informant cooperation.
Marked decline of open Mafia leadership due to law enforcement pressure.
4. United States v. Genovese Family (The “Valachi Case”) (1963)
Background:
Joseph Valachi was the first Mafia insider to publicly testify about La Cosa Nostra’s structure, rituals, and operations before a Senate committee, breaking the Mafia’s code of silence.
Charges:
Valachi testified as part of his cooperation agreement after being convicted of narcotics and racketeering.
Prosecution Strategy:
Valachi’s testimony was pivotal in informing law enforcement about Mafia operations and validating existing theories.
Used in later prosecutions as foundation evidence.
Defense Arguments:
Mafia attempted to discredit Valachi as a liar and traitor.
Outcome:
Valachi’s revelations led to expanded surveillance and RICO statute development.
Legal Significance:
Exposed inner workings of LCN to the public and government.
Instrumental in shaping organized crime prosecutions for decades.
5. United States v. Angelo “Quack Quack” Ruggiero and Associates (The “Pizza Connection” Case) (1985–1987)
Background:
This case targeted the Sicilian and American Mafia’s heroin and cocaine distribution network, which used pizzerias and restaurants as fronts.
Charges:
RICO violations
Drug trafficking
Money laundering
Murder conspiracy
Prosecution Strategy:
Multi-year undercover operations with FBI informants.
Surveillance and wiretaps of pizza parlors.
Tracking of drug shipments and financial transactions.
Defense Arguments:
Denied involvement in drug trafficking, claimed legitimate business operations.
Challenged surveillance legality.
Outcome:
Convictions for several defendants including Ruggiero.
Sentences ranged from 20 years to life.
Legal Significance:
Demonstrated Mafia’s infiltration into legitimate business as a cover for narcotics.
Strengthened RICO’s application to drug-related organized crime.
6. United States v. Anthony “Gaspipe” Casso (1994)
Background:
Casso was the underboss of the Lucchese family, infamous for his brutality and involvement in dozens of murders and racketeering.
Charges:
RICO violations
Murder and conspiracy to murder
Extortion
Drug trafficking
Prosecution Strategy:
Received critical insider cooperation from Casso himself after arrest.
Testimonies implicated many high-level members.
Forensic evidence and wiretaps confirmed racketeering patterns.
Defense Arguments:
Casso’s cooperation undercut defense; others denied charges but lacked evidence.
Outcome:
Casso pleaded guilty in exchange for protection.
Helped convict numerous associates.
Sentenced to life imprisonment.
Legal Significance:
Showed power of insider cooperation to dismantle entire families.
Helped law enforcement map Mafia hierarchies.
Summary Table of Key Cases
| Case | Charges | Outcome | Legal Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Murder, Inc. Case (Luciano et al.) | Murder, conspiracy | Multiple convictions | Early Mafia prosecution, use of informants |
| Mafia Commission Trial | RICO, extortion, murder | Bosses convicted | First RICO use against Mafia Commission |
| John Gotti Trial | RICO, murder, extortion | Life imprisonment | Informant cooperation, effective surveillance |
| Valachi Testimony | Testimony on LCN structure | Foundation for prosecutions | Revealed Mafia secrets, public exposure |
| Pizza Connection | RICO, drug trafficking | Multiple convictions | Mafia’s use of legitimate fronts in drug trafficking |
| Anthony Casso Case | RICO, murder, extortion | Guilty plea, life sentence | Insider cooperation aiding prosecutions |
Final Notes
The RICO Act revolutionized how prosecutors charge organized crime, focusing on the criminal enterprise itself.
Informants and defectors (e.g., Valachi, Gravano, Casso) have been crucial in securing convictions.
Law enforcement employs a combination of surveillance, wiretaps, undercover operations, and financial tracking to dismantle LCN networks.
Cases demonstrate Mafia’s evolution from overt violence to complex infiltration of legitimate businesses and narcotics trafficking.
RELATED Blog
0 comments