Documentary Evidence Under New Laws
1. Understanding Documentary Evidence
Documentary evidence refers to any evidence produced in the form of documents. These documents may include:
Written contracts,
Electronic records,
Photographs,
Official records,
Reports,
Digital documents, etc.
Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, documentary evidence is governed primarily by Sections 61 to 90.
With the introduction of new laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000, and amendments in procedural laws, the scope of documentary evidence has expanded to include electronic records and digitally signed documents.
2. New Laws Affecting Documentary Evidence
Information Technology Act, 2000: Recognizes electronic records and digital signatures as valid documentary evidence.
Section 65A and 65B of Indian Evidence Act: Provide rules for admissibility of electronic records.
The Registration Act, 1908 (Amended Rules): Includes digitally signed documents for registration.
The Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2000: Includes electronic evidence in the definition of “documents.”
The Companies Act, 2013 and Income Tax Act also rely on electronic records for proof.
3. Key Principles of Documentary Evidence under New Laws
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Admissibility | Documents must be relevant, authentic, and comply with legal formalities. Electronic documents must satisfy Section 65B requirements. |
| Primary Evidence | The original document itself is primary evidence (Section 61, Indian Evidence Act). |
| Secondary Evidence | Copies or counterparts admitted if originals are lost or unavailable (Sections 63-65). |
| Electronic Records | Electronic documents (emails, PDFs, databases) need certificates under Section 65B(4) for admissibility. |
| Digital Signatures | Recognized as valid under IT Act for authenticity. |
4. Landmark Case Laws on Documentary Evidence Under New Laws
🔹 Case 1: Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Ors. (2014)
Key Issue: Admissibility of electronic records without a certificate under Section 65B.
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled that electronic records are admissible only if accompanied by a 65B certificate unless the original device is produced.
Significance:
Established mandatory compliance with 65B for electronic documentary evidence.
🔹 Case 2: Bihar State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. v. Bihar State Information Technology Ltd. (2007)
Key Issue: Validity of electronically stored documents.
Held:
Electronic records stored in computers and produced in court with proper authentication have the same evidentiary value as paper documents.
Significance:
Validated the equivalence of electronic and paper documents under IT Act and Evidence Act.
🔹 Case 3: K. Ramachandra Reddy v. Vijayalakshmi (2001)
Key Issue: Photographs as documentary evidence.
Held:
Court held photographs are admissible as documentary evidence if relevant and properly identified.
Significance:
Expanded documentary evidence to include visual forms.
🔹 Case 4: State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992)
Key Issue: Proof of documents under Sections 65 and 66 of Indian Evidence Act.
Held:
If original documents are not produced, secondary evidence is admissible only if the non-production is satisfactorily explained.
Significance:
Clarified rules about secondary evidence, which are equally applicable to electronic documents.
🔹 Case 5: Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018)
Key Issue: Relaxation of certificate requirement under Section 65B for electronic evidence.
Held:
The court allowed relaxation in some cases where the party producing the evidence is not in control of the electronic device.
Significance:
Pragmatic approach towards electronic documentary evidence under new laws.
🔹 Case 6: C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammad (2007)
Key Issue: Admissibility of public documents.
Held:
Officially certified public documents are self-authenticating and do not require further proof of genuineness.
Significance:
Important for documentary evidence where government-issued certificates and registers are involved.
5. Practical Aspects and Application
Authentication of Documents: Modern laws require digital signatures or certificates for electronic documents.
Verification of Originals: Courts still prefer original documents but accept electronic versions with certificates.
Document Preservation: Under IT laws, electronic documents must be maintained without tampering.
Evidence Submission: Electronic evidence is often submitted on CDs, pen drives, or emails with proper certification.
6. Summary Table of Cases
| Case | Year | Issue | Principle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anvar P.V. v. Basheer | 2014 | Electronic evidence admissibility | Mandatory 65B certificate |
| Bihar State Electronics v. Bihar State IT | 2007 | Validity of electronic docs | Equal evidentiary value of electronic docs |
| K. Ramachandra Reddy v. Vijayalakshmi | 2001 | Photographs as evidence | Photos admissible as documentary evidence |
| State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal | 1992 | Secondary evidence | Explained admissibility of secondary evidence |
| Shafhi Mohammad v. State | 2018 | Relaxation on 65B certificate | Allowed in exceptional cases |
| C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammad | 2007 | Public documents | Self-authentication of certified public docs |
7. Conclusion
With the advent of digital technology, documentary evidence has broadened to include electronic and digital records. The Information Technology Act and amendments to the Indian Evidence Act ensure that electronic documents are admissible, subject to authentication requirements like the Section 65B certificate.
Judicial pronouncements reinforce the necessity of compliance with new laws while providing pragmatic exceptions to avoid injustice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments