Remand Proceedings Under Section 167 Crpc
What is Section 167 CrPC?
Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) deals with the procedure for the police or magistrate to seek custody of an accused during investigation, especially when the accused is in custody for investigation and the investigation cannot be completed within 24 hours.
Key Provisions of Section 167 CrPC:
Initial detention: When a person is arrested without a warrant, the police must produce the accused before the Magistrate within 24 hours (excluding the time necessary for the journey).
Remand application: If investigation is not complete within 24 hours, police may request judicial custody (police or judicial remand).
Judicial discretion: The Magistrate may grant police custody (accused stays in police lockup) or judicial custody (accused is sent to jail).
Maximum remand period: For most offences, the maximum period of detention without chargesheet is 15 days. For offences punishable with life imprisonment or death, this period can be extended up to 30 days.
Requirement to complete investigation: Police must complete investigation and submit charge-sheet within this remand period, failing which the accused should be released on bail (if otherwise eligible).
Purpose of Section 167 CrPC
To balance the need for effective investigation with protection of accused's liberty.
To prevent indefinite detention without trial.
To provide judicial supervision over police custody.
Important Case Laws on Remand Proceedings Under Section 167 CrPC
1. Hussainara Khatoon & Ors. v. State of Bihar (1979) — AIR 1979 SC 1369
Facts: The case highlighted the plight of undertrial prisoners who had been detained for long periods without trial or charge-sheet.
Held: The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of Section 167 CrPC and ruled that detention beyond the prescribed period without trial violates the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21.
Significance: This landmark case laid down the right to speedy trial and that prolonged detention without filing charge-sheet is illegal.
2. Bhajan Singh v. State of Punjab (1992) — AIR 1992 SC 604
Facts: The accused was held in police custody beyond the permissible period under Section 167.
Held: The Court held that failure to produce the accused before the Magistrate within 24 hours or seek proper remand orders is illegal detention. It underscored the need for compliance with the procedural safeguards.
Significance: Reinforced strict adherence to the timelines and procedural safeguards under Section 167.
3. K.S. Kanaka v. State of Karnataka (1980) — AIR 1980 SC 1630
Facts: The police failed to complete the investigation within the maximum remand period.
Held: The Court held that where the investigation is not complete within the 15/30 days, the accused must be released on bail (if eligible) and that the right to bail arises mandatorily.
Significance: Clarified the mandatory nature of bail if charge-sheet is not filed within the stipulated time under Section 167(2).
4. Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab (1980) — AIR 1980 SC 150
Facts: The accused challenged their extended detention without chargesheet.
Held: The Supreme Court ruled that a Magistrate cannot authorize remand without proper justification and material on record. Remand is an exception, not the rule.
Significance: Established that remand must be based on material facts and is not a routine or automatic order.
5. D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) — AIR 1997 SC 610
Facts: This case dealt with illegal detention and custodial torture, including remand procedures.
Held: The Court issued detailed guidelines for arrest, detention, and remand procedures to prevent abuse of power and ensure rights of the accused during custody.
Significance: Strengthened procedural safeguards during remand, including proper record-keeping and informing relatives.
Summary of Key Legal Principles Under Section 167 CrPC:
Legal Principle | Explanation |
---|---|
Production within 24 hours mandatory | Accused must be produced before Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest. |
Judicial approval required for remand | Police custody or judicial custody can be granted only by Magistrate’s order. |
Maximum remand period | Generally 15 days; up to 30 days for serious offences; detention beyond this period is illegal. |
Mandatory bail after expiry of remand | Bail becomes a right if investigation is not complete within the prescribed period. |
Remand orders require justification | Magistrate must be satisfied with reasons before granting remand; it is not automatic. |
Rights and safeguards during remand | Arrest memo, medical examination, informing family, and proper recording are mandatory. |
Conclusion
Section 167 CrPC plays a critical role in safeguarding the rights of accused persons during investigation. It ensures that police custody or judicial custody is granted only when necessary and for a limited time. The judicial oversight embedded in the remand process prevents illegal detention and protects personal liberty.
0 comments