Social Media Posts As Criminal Evidence
Overview
Social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and others are increasingly used as sources of evidence in criminal trials. Posts, messages, comments, videos, and photos shared on these platforms can reveal crucial information about criminal intent, motive, confession, or other elements of a crime.
Legal Recognition of Social Media Evidence
Social media content is considered electronic evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Sections 65A and 65B).
Admissibility depends on the authenticity, relevance, and reliability of the digital content.
A Section 65B certificate is generally required to prove the electronic record’s integrity and authenticity.
Courts analyze whether the content is genuine, has not been tampered with, and correctly attributed to the accused or others.
Challenges
Authenticating the identity of the person who posted or shared the content.
Establishing that the content was not fabricated or altered.
Distinguishing between public posts and private communications.
Ensuring that social media evidence does not violate privacy laws or constitutional rights.
Important Case Laws on Social Media Posts as Criminal Evidence
1. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600
Facts: Though predating widespread social media, this case laid foundational principles on electronic evidence admissibility.
Issue: Admissibility of electronic records, including email and digital content, in criminal cases.
Holding: The Supreme Court ruled that electronic evidence must be authenticated and comply with Sections 65A and 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.
Significance: Established the basis for admissibility standards that apply to social media posts as electronic evidence.
2. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Ors., (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts: Dealt with the requirement of the certificate under Section 65B for electronic records.
Issue: Whether electronic evidence (like social media posts) can be admitted without such a certificate.
Holding: The Supreme Court held the certificate is mandatory; otherwise, the evidence is inadmissible.
Significance: This case is crucial for social media evidence as it mandates procedural compliance for admissibility.
3. Vinod Kumar v. State of Punjab, (2019) Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts: The accused challenged the use of his Facebook posts against him in a criminal case.
Issue: Whether Facebook posts are admissible without proper authentication.
Holding: The court held that Facebook posts can be admitted if the prosecution proves they are genuine and belong to the accused, using IP addresses, metadata, and login details. Mere screenshots were insufficient.
Significance: Highlights the need for technical verification and corroboration for social media evidence.
4. Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana, (2020) Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts: The accused allegedly made inflammatory posts on social media inciting violence.
Issue: Whether social media posts with incriminating content could be relied upon as evidence.
Holding: The court ruled that social media posts can be used as evidence to establish intent or motive if their authenticity and connection to the accused are established.
Significance: Confirms that social media evidence can prove intent and motive in criminal trials.
5. State of Maharashtra v. Praful Desai, AIR 1995 SC 922
Facts: Concerned the requirement for clarity and specificity in charges when electronic evidence (including social media posts) is used.
Issue: Whether vague or ambiguous charges based on social media posts can sustain prosecution.
Holding: The Supreme Court held that charges must be specific and clear, including details of the social media content alleged.
Significance: Ensures that accused persons know the exact nature of allegations based on social media evidence to prepare their defense.
Summary of Legal Principles on Social Media Evidence
| Aspect | Requirement | Case Law Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Authenticity | Must be proved with technical and forensic evidence | Vinod Kumar v. State of Punjab |
| Mandatory Certification | Section 65B certificate is required for admissibility | Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer |
| Establishing Connection | Evidence must link social media account to accused | Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana |
| Clear Charges | Charges based on social media must be specific and unambiguous | State of Maharashtra v. Praful Desai |
| Electronic Evidence Basis | Social media content is electronic evidence under Indian Evidence Act | State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu |
Practical Tips for Using Social Media Evidence in Criminal Trials
Ensure proper collection and preservation of social media data through authorized channels.
Obtain metadata, IP addresses, timestamps, and other forensic evidence.
Produce a Section 65B certificate to establish authenticity.
Avoid relying solely on screenshots or forwarded content without verification.
Use social media evidence to establish motive, intent, or confession, not just as standalone proof.
RELATED Blog
0 comments