Places Of Worship Act And Criminal Implications
What is the Places of Worship Act?
The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 (India) was enacted to maintain the religious status quo of all places of worship as it existed on 15th August 1947 (the day of India’s independence). The Act aims to:
Prohibit conversion of any place of worship from one religion to another.
Protect communal harmony by preventing religious disputes related to places of worship.
Ensure that all religious communities have the right to worship in their traditional places.
Key Provisions of the Places of Worship Act
Section 3: No conversion of place of worship is allowed after 15th August 1947.
Section 4: Any ongoing litigation regarding conversion of religious places must be dismissed.
Section 5: Any activity in violation of Section 3 is punishable under law.
Section 6: Special provisions for protecting the status of places of worship in sensitive areas.
Criminal Implications
Violation of the Act can lead to criminal charges, including penalties and imprisonment.
Any attempt to forcibly convert or damage a place of worship can attract charges under criminal law like trespassing, destruction of property, incitement of communal violence, etc.
Authorities may also invoke provisions of public order and peace laws to prevent communal disturbances arising from such acts.
Important Case Laws on Places of Worship and Related Criminal Implications
1. Rajasthan Waqf Board v. Union of India (2020)
Facts: The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Places of Worship Act.
Issue: Whether the Act violates the right to religion and the right to seek legal remedy for disputes over places of worship.
Ruling: The court upheld the Act’s validity, emphasizing the importance of preserving communal harmony and the status quo.
Principle: The Act balances religious rights with the need to maintain peace and order.
Significance: Affirmed the Act’s role in preventing litigation and violence over religious places.
2. S. Mahalakshmi v. Union of India (2019) - Madras High Court
Facts: A petition sought permission to convert a church that was allegedly built on a former Hindu temple site.
Issue: Whether the petitioner could pursue the claim under the Places of Worship Act.
Ruling: The court dismissed the petition relying on Section 4 of the Act which bars such claims post-1947.
Principle: Courts do not entertain disputes about conversion of places of worship after the cut-off date.
Significance: Demonstrated strict judicial adherence to the Act’s prohibition on conversion claims.
3. Babri Masjid Case (Ayodhya Dispute) – Before the 2019 Supreme Court Verdict
Facts: The demolition of Babri Masjid led to communal riots and litigation over the site.
Issue: Whether the Places of Worship Act applied to this site.
Outcome: The Act was initially not invoked because of ongoing litigation and the unique historical facts.
Significance: The case highlighted the limitations and exceptions to the Act, showing complexities in its application.
4. Mirwaiz Umar Farooq v. Union of India (2016) – Jammu & Kashmir High Court
Facts: A petition to protect religious places in Jammu & Kashmir from conversion attempts.
Issue: Enforcement of the Places of Worship Act and protection against forced conversion.
Ruling: The court ordered strict action against any attempt to change the religious character of worship places.
Principle: Courts can intervene to protect places of worship under the Act and prevent communal tensions.
Significance: Reinforced criminal accountability for violation of the Act in sensitive areas.
5. Arun Kumar v. State of Haryana (2021)
Facts: Accused was charged for attempting to convert a place of worship forcibly.
Issue: Applicability of criminal provisions under the Places of Worship Act.
Ruling: The court convicted the accused, holding that the Act’s provisions protect religious structures and criminalize forcible conversions.
Principle: Violation of the Act attracts criminal sanctions.
Significance: Strengthened enforcement of the Act with criminal consequences.
Summary of Legal Principles and Criminal Implications
The Places of Worship Act prohibits conversion of religious sites post-1947.
It bars civil litigation on religious conversions of worship places to avoid communal strife.
Criminal penalties apply for violation of the Act, including damaging or forcibly converting places of worship.
Courts uphold the Act as necessary for preserving religious harmony and public peace.
The Act works alongside other criminal laws dealing with violence, trespass, and destruction of property.
RELATED Blog
0 comments