Forced Displacement As A War Crime Under Afghan Law
I. Introduction
Forced displacement refers to the unlawful removal or expulsion of civilians from their homes or habitual places of residence during an armed conflict, without valid military justification. This act is considered a serious violation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and is criminalized under both Afghan national law and international treaties to which Afghanistan is a party.
II. Legal Framework in Afghanistan
1. Afghan Constitution (2004)
Article 58: Provides protection of human rights through the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission.
Article 7: Obliges the state to observe international treaties and human rights conventions.
2. Afghan Penal Code (2017)
Articles 395–401: Criminalize war crimes, including those against civilians.
Article 396: Specifically mentions the prohibition of forced displacement as a war crime.
Punishable with long-term imprisonment or life sentence depending on the severity and consequences.
3. Afghanistan's International Obligations
Rome Statute of the ICC (2003 ratification): Afghanistan recognizes forced displacement as a war crime under Article 8(2)(e)(viii).
Geneva Conventions (1949): Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49 prohibits the forcible transfer or deportation of protected persons.
III. Legal Elements of the Crime of Forced Displacement
Unlawful displacement of civilians during armed conflict.
Lack of military necessity or security concerns.
The displacement is carried out systematically or as part of a policy.
Targeting civilians or specific ethnic, religious, or political groups.
IV. Key Case Law in Afghanistan
Below are detailed discussions of five relevant documented or referenced cases related to forced displacement during periods of conflict in Afghanistan. Some are judicially prosecuted, while others are investigated or documented by human rights bodies and international observers.
1. The Kuchi-Hazara Conflict (2007–2010): Displacement in Behsud District, Wardak Province
Background:
Long-standing land disputes between nomadic Kuchi Pashtuns and Hazara communities escalated into violence in Behsud and Daimirdad.
Kuchi militias, allegedly supported by Taliban elements, forcibly expelled Hazara families from villages.
Legal Relevance:
No military necessity justified the displacement; rather, it was driven by ethnic and political motives.
Violated Article 396 of the Afghan Penal Code.
Response:
While the Afghan government attempted mediation, no successful prosecutions were made.
AIHRC documented the forced displacement of over 1,800 Hazara families.
Indicates impunity and lack of enforcement despite legal prohibitions.
2. Taliban Offensives in Kunduz (2015): Civilian Expulsions
Background:
Taliban briefly captured Kunduz city in September 2015.
Reports emerged of civilians being ordered to leave certain neighborhoods; ethnic Tajiks and Uzbeks were especially targeted.
Legal Relevance:
The act constituted intentional displacement of civilians, often on ethnic lines.
Considered a war crime under both domestic and international law.
Response:
No prosecutions were carried out, but Afghan and international NGOs documented the crimes.
The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) classified these as war crimes and urged investigation.
3. Forced Displacement in Helmand by Taliban (2016–2018)
Background:
In Taliban-controlled areas of Helmand, entire villages were emptied under threat of violence.
The Taliban accused locals of supporting government forces.
Legal Relevance:
These actions met the criteria for collective punishment and forced displacement.
Violated Afghan Penal Code Article 396 and Geneva Conventions.
Judicial Action:
Limited judicial reach in Taliban areas.
Human Rights Watch documented forced displacement in Nad Ali, Marjah, and Sangin districts.
Analysis:
Despite clear legal frameworks, state capacity limitations hindered prosecution.
Demonstrates need for hybrid or internationalized justice mechanisms.
4. Operation by Afghan Local Police in Kunar (2013): Retaliatory Displacement
Background:
Afghan Local Police (ALP) in Kunar province were accused of forcibly expelling families of suspected insurgents.
This was a retaliatory measure with no judicial oversight.
Legal Relevance:
Government-affiliated actors committing unlawful collective punishment.
Violates Afghan law and IHL.
Outcome:
Internal investigation by Ministry of Interior led to some disciplinary measures, but no criminal prosecution.
Shows gap between administrative and criminal accountability.
5. Islamic State – Khorasan Province (IS-K) in Nangarhar (2015–2019)
Background:
IS-K fighters seized territory in Achin and Deh Bala districts, forcibly displacing local families, mainly from Pashtun Shinwari tribes.
Threatened executions for non-compliance, burned homes and fields.
Legal Relevance:
Widespread and systematic—amounts to crimes against humanity and war crimes.
IS-K not a recognized government, but individual perpetrators can still be prosecuted under Afghan law.
Response:
Afghan National Directorate of Security (NDS) conducted military operations, but no court trials against captured IS-K fighters for displacement charges.
Important test case for future transitional justice.
V. Challenges in Prosecution
Security Environment: Ongoing conflict makes investigation and prosecution difficult.
Weak Judicial Capacity: Particularly in remote and insurgent-controlled areas.
Political Sensitivities: Ethnic and tribal dynamics complicate enforcement.
Impunity: Especially for powerful actors or groups with political backing.
VI. Conclusion
Under Afghan law, forced displacement during conflict is a punishable war crime with a detailed legal basis. The Afghan Penal Code and international conventions provide the tools to prosecute such acts. However, implementation remains weak, with many perpetrators enjoying impunity.
To improve accountability, Afghanistan must:
Strengthen its judicial institutions.
Cooperate with international bodies.
Establish special war crimes tribunals or truth commissions to address historical cases.
RELATED Blog
0 comments