Volkswagen Emissions Fraud Prosecutions
Volkswagen Emissions Fraud: Overview
Volkswagen AG was found to have installed “defeat devices” in certain diesel vehicles, allowing the cars to pass emissions tests under laboratory conditions while emitting nitrogen oxides (NOx) at levels far above legal limits during normal driving. The scandal erupted in 2015 and led to investigations in the U.S., Europe, and other jurisdictions.
Case 1: United States v. Volkswagen AG (2017)
Facts:
The U.S. Department of Justice charged Volkswagen with violating the Clean Air Act by installing defeat devices in approximately 600,000 vehicles sold in the U.S.
Charges:
Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government.
Obstruction of justice.
False statements.
Outcome:
Volkswagen pleaded guilty.
Paid over $4.3 billion in criminal fines and penalties.
Agreed to civil settlements exceeding $15 billion, including vehicle buybacks and environmental mitigation.
Several senior executives were indicted, and some faced imprisonment.
Significance:
Landmark case demonstrating the use of criminal law against corporate environmental fraud.
Established precedent for prosecuting complex corporate conspiracies involving environmental violations.
Case 2: United States v. Oliver Schmidt (2017)
Facts:
Oliver Schmidt, a former VW manager in the U.S., was charged with conspiracy and making false statements about emissions compliance.
Charges:
Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Making false statements.
Outcome:
Schmidt pleaded guilty.
Sentenced to 7 months in prison and fined $400,000.
Significance:
First high-profile individual conviction in the Dieselgate scandal.
Sent message that individuals, not just corporations, could be held criminally liable.
Case 3: United States v. James Liang (2019)
Facts:
James Liang, a VW engineer, pleaded guilty to conspiracy related to the development of defeat devices.
Charges:
Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government.
Outcome:
Liang was sentenced to 40 months in prison.
Ordered to pay $200,000 in restitution.
Significance:
Highlighted the role of engineers and technical staff in corporate fraud.
Emphasized accountability at all organizational levels.
Case 4: European Prosecution: German Federal Prosecutor's Office Investigation (2018–Present)
Facts:
German prosecutors investigated Volkswagen executives and managers for fraud and false advertising related to emissions cheating.
Charges:
Fraud.
Breach of trust.
Violation of environmental laws.
Outcome:
Several executives were indicted, but prosecutions have faced delays and legal challenges, reflecting differences between U.S. and European approaches.
Volkswagen agreed to pay fines totaling hundreds of millions of euros to German authorities.
Significance:
Showed the complexity of prosecuting corporate fraud in Europe.
Raised questions about corporate governance and regulatory enforcement.
Case 5: California Air Resources Board (CARB) Enforcement Action (2017)
Facts:
CARB fined Volkswagen for violating state emissions standards.
Charges:
Violation of California’s emissions regulations.
Outcome:
Volkswagen paid over $800 million in penalties and agreed to remedial measures, including funding for zero-emission vehicle programs.
Significance:
Reinforced the role of state-level enforcement in environmental compliance.
Demonstrated multi-layered regulatory response in the U.S.
Case 6: United States v. James Liang (Civil Penalties and Sentencing, 2020)
Facts:
Following his guilty plea, James Liang faced sentencing and civil penalty proceedings.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 40 months in prison.
Ordered to pay restitution.
Case set precedent on sentencing engineers involved in corporate environmental fraud.
Significance:
Reinforced that individuals involved in technical implementation can face significant consequences.
Highlighted collaboration between prosecutors and regulatory agencies.
Summary Table
| Case | Charges | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. v. Volkswagen AG | Clean Air Act violations, conspiracy | Guilty plea, billions in fines | Landmark corporate environmental fraud case |
| U.S. v. Oliver Schmidt | Conspiracy, false statements | 7 months prison, fined | Individual executive liability |
| U.S. v. James Liang | Conspiracy | 40 months prison, restitution | Engineer accountability in corporate fraud |
| German Federal Prosecutor | Fraud, breach of trust | Ongoing prosecution, fines | European legal approach differences |
| CARB Enforcement | State emissions violations | $800 million penalty | State-level enforcement in environmental law |
Legal Implications and Lessons
Corporate Liability: Volkswagen’s case demonstrates how corporations can be held criminally responsible for systematic fraud.
Individual Accountability: Prosecutors have increasingly targeted executives and engineers involved.
Environmental Enforcement: The case boosted enforcement of environmental laws and regulatory oversight.
International Jurisdictional Issues: Coordination between U.S., European, and other international regulators is complex but critical.
Remediation and Compliance: Large settlements fund environmental restoration and promote future compliance.
RELATED Blog
0 comments