Landmark Judgments On Inter-Faith Marriage Protection
1. Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017) - Triple Talaq Case
Background:
Shayara Bano challenged the practice of talaq-e-biddat (instant triple talaq), which allowed Muslim men to divorce their wives instantly by pronouncing “talaq” thrice.
Issue:
Though not directly about inter-faith marriage, this case impacted Muslim women's rights and their protection within marriage, including inter-faith marriages involving Muslim men.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court declared instant triple talaq unconstitutional, violating the fundamental rights of Muslim women under Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination), and 21 (right to life and liberty).
Significance:
Protected Muslim women in inter-faith marriages or otherwise from arbitrary divorce.
Strengthened the right to equality and dignity within marital relationships.
2. Lata Singh v. State of UP (2006)
Background:
Lata Singh, a Hindu woman, married a Muslim man against her parents' wishes. Her parents filed a complaint, alleging abduction and causing religious conversion.
Issue:
Whether the woman’s fundamental right to marry a person of her choice overrides parental objections based on religion.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that the right to marry a person of one’s choice is a fundamental right under Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty). The court emphasized that adults have autonomy in choosing their partners, and the state cannot interfere based on religious considerations.
Significance:
Affirmed individual autonomy over religious and parental pressures.
Reinforced protection for inter-faith marriages by upholding personal liberty.
3. Hadiya Case (Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M., 2018)
Background:
Hadiya, a Hindu woman, converted to Islam and married a Muslim man. Her family challenged her marriage, alleging coercion and conversion.
Issue:
The court had to decide whether an adult woman’s choice to marry and convert is valid and whether it should be protected from parental interference.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court upheld Hadiya's right to marry the person of her choice and rejected claims of coercion. It stressed the right to freedom of religion and personal liberty under Articles 21 and 25 (freedom of religion).
Significance:
Reaffirmed the right to marry irrespective of religion.
Protected inter-faith marriages from being annulled due to family opposition.
Strengthened the principles of individual choice and freedom of religion.
4. Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995)
Background:
Several Hindu women converted to Islam to marry Muslim men without dissolving their Hindu marriages, leading to legal complications regarding polygamy and religious laws.
Issue:
The court examined whether such conversions were genuine or a means to circumvent Hindu personal law to contract a second marriage.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that a Hindu husband converting to Islam solely to contract a second marriage without dissolving the first marriage is not protected by Muslim personal law. Such a second marriage would be void under Hindu law and criminal under the Indian Penal Code.
Significance:
Addressed the conflict between personal laws and inter-faith marriages.
Emphasized the need to respect personal laws while preventing misuse for polygamy.
Highlighted challenges faced by inter-faith couples due to overlapping religious laws.
5. S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal (2010)
Background:
Khushboo, an actress, made comments on pre-marital sex which offended some religious groups, leading to attempts to restrict freedom of expression related to marriage and relationships.
Issue:
The balance between freedom of speech, personal liberty, and societal/religious sentiments.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court upheld Khushboo’s right to express her views and emphasized that adults have the right to make personal choices in marriage and relationships.
Significance:
Reinforced individual autonomy in marriage and relationships.
Strengthened the principle of personal liberty in matters of inter-faith or any kind of marriage.
Summary:
These judgments collectively protect inter-faith marriages by:
Upholding right to personal liberty and marriage choices (Articles 21, 25).
Protecting freedom of religion, including the right to convert.
Safeguarding women’s rights within marriage.
Limiting state and parental interference.
Addressing misuse of personal laws.
RELATED Blog
0 comments