Dying Declarations And Admissibility
1. What is a Dying Declaration?
A Dying Declaration is a statement made by a person who believes that their death is imminent, regarding the cause or circumstances of their death. It is usually given by the victim of a homicide or grievous injury, who is on their deathbed.
2. Legal Framework for Dying Declarations in India
Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 provides the basis for the admissibility of dying declarations.
A dying declaration is treated as an exception to the general rule against hearsay evidence.
It is admitted in evidence on the presumption that a person on their deathbed is unlikely to lie.
3. Conditions for Admissibility
The declarant must believe death is imminent.
The statement must relate to the cause or circumstances of their death.
It must be voluntary, truthful, and free from coercion or prompting.
The declarant must be competent to make the statement (i.e., conscious and capable of understanding the nature of the statement).
The mode of recording (oral or written) is not rigidly prescribed.
The statement need not be made before a magistrate, but if made in court or before a magistrate, it is considered stronger evidence.
4. Importance of Dying Declarations
Often the only direct evidence against accused in murder or attempt to murder cases.
Helps in establishing identity of the assailant, weapon used, motive, or sequence of events.
Courts carefully scrutinize the circumstances and consistency of dying declarations.
5. Landmark Case Laws on Dying Declarations in Indian Law
Case 1: K. Ramachandra Reddy v. Public Prosecutor (1955)
Facts:
The victim made a dying declaration identifying the accused who attacked him.
Legal Issue:
Is a dying declaration admissible even if not made before a magistrate?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that a dying declaration need not necessarily be recorded before a magistrate to be admissible. The crucial factor is the voluntariness and truthfulness of the statement.
Significance:
The case laid down that the test is reliability, not formality.
Case 2: Tukaram S. Dighole v. State of Maharashtra (2010)
Facts:
The accused challenged the dying declaration’s admissibility claiming it was inconsistent and made under influence.
Legal Issue:
When can a dying declaration be relied upon for conviction?
Holding:
The Supreme Court reiterated that the dying declaration is a very important piece of evidence and can be the sole basis for conviction if it inspires confidence. Minor inconsistencies do not affect the admissibility unless they shake the credibility.
Significance:
Emphasized that credibility and consistency are the touchstones for reliance on dying declarations.
Case 3: Queen-Empress v. Manik Rai (1881)
Facts:
An early case discussing the principle behind dying declarations.
Legal Issue:
Why is the dying declaration admissible as an exception to hearsay?
Holding:
The court held that since a person on their deathbed is unlikely to fabricate or lie, such statements are considered trustworthy and are thus admissible.
Significance:
This case formed the foundational principle of the dying declaration rule.
Case 4: Gopal Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1954)
Facts:
Victim gave two dying declarations with minor contradictions.
Legal Issue:
Can contradictions in dying declarations affect their admissibility?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that minor contradictions in the dying declarations do not necessarily render them unreliable. The court must assess the overall credibility and circumstances.
Significance:
Confirmed that the court must appreciate the natural frailties of dying persons while evaluating their statements.
Case 5: Bhagwan Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1954)
Facts:
Victim’s dying declaration was delayed and recorded hours after the incident.
Legal Issue:
Does delay in making a dying declaration affect its admissibility?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that the timing is not rigid; a dying declaration can be made any time before death, and delay does not affect its admissibility if the declarant had the sense of impending death.
Significance:
Expanded the flexibility regarding timing of dying declarations.
Case 6: Padam Singh v. State of Haryana (1999)
Facts:
Dying declaration was made to a police officer.
Legal Issue:
Is dying declaration recorded by police admissible?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that dying declarations recorded by police are admissible, but courts must scrutinize the circumstances and be satisfied about voluntariness and truthfulness.
Significance:
Clarified admissibility but warned courts to be cautious about declarations recorded by police due to potential influence.
Case 7: Lal Singh v. State of Punjab (1965)
Facts:
The victim made a dying declaration before a magistrate.
Legal Issue:
Is dying declaration before a magistrate more reliable?
Holding:
The court held that dying declarations before magistrates carry greater weight but are not mandatory. Other forms are admissible if credible.
Significance:
This case set a benchmark for the weight of judicially recorded dying declarations.
6. Summary of Key Points on Dying Declarations
Dying declarations are exceptions to the hearsay rule and admissible under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act.
Voluntariness, belief in impending death, and relevance to cause of death are critical.
They can be recorded orally or in writing, before magistrate or private individuals.
Courts analyze credibility, consistency, and circumstances surrounding the statement.
Dying declarations can alone form the basis of conviction if found reliable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments