Section 356 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, (BSA), 2023
detailed, comprehensive explanation of Section 356 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023:
Section 356: Proof of Documents Produced by the Adverse Party (Detailed Explanation)
Introduction:
In judicial proceedings, documents form an essential part of evidence to establish facts. When one party submits a document, the other party — the adverse party — has certain rights regarding that document’s acceptance and proof. Section 356 addresses how courts treat documents produced by the adverse party — that is, the opposing side in a case.
What Does Section 356 Say?
The section establishes a fundamental presumption:
When a party produces a document in court against you (the adverse party), that document is accepted as prima facie evidence of its contents.
Prima facie means "on its face" or at first sight — the court initially assumes the document is genuine and truthful in what it states.
This means the document is treated as proof of the facts it contains, unless the adverse party challenges it successfully.
Why is this Important?
The presumption encourages the efficient administration of justice.
If the adverse party did not accept the document’s authenticity, they presumably would not have introduced it.
By accepting the document prima facie, the court avoids unnecessary formal proof when a party voluntarily uses the document.
It saves time and resources by preventing the opposing party from repeatedly having to prove documents that the other side itself has submitted.
Rights of the Adverse Party:
Despite the presumption, the section safeguards fairness by allowing the adverse party to challenge the document in various ways:
They can question the authenticity of the document. For example, alleging it is forged or fabricated.
They can dispute the contents of the document or claim it is incomplete or altered.
They may argue the document is irrelevant to the case or otherwise inadmissible under the law.
If the court finds these challenges credible, it may reject or give less weight to the document.
Practical Application:
Suppose Party A produces a contract document to claim ownership over a property.
Party B, the adverse party, can initially assume the contract is genuine and accept its contents.
However, Party B has the right to show that the contract was forged, or that it was altered after signing, or that the contract is irrelevant because it was superseded by another agreement.
Until Party B successfully disproves the document, the court treats it as true.
Broader Legal Context:
Section 356 complements other rules in the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam related to:
Primary and secondary evidence of documents.
Presumptions about documents, including their authenticity and execution.
The procedure for proving documents and exceptions to the general rules.
Together, these provisions maintain balance between the expedient admission of evidence and protecting parties from false or misleading documents.
Summary
Section 356 states that documents produced by the adverse party are accepted as prima facie proof of their contents.
This means they are initially treated as valid evidence.
The adverse party has the right to challenge the document’s authenticity, content, or admissibility.
This ensures efficiency without compromising fairness in legal proceedings.
RELATED Blog
0 comments