Benami Transactions: Criminalization And Overlaps With Pmla
Benami Transactions: Criminalization & Overlaps with PMLA
What is a Benami Transaction?
Benami transaction refers to a transaction where property is held by one person, but the consideration is paid by another.
The person in whose name the property is held is called the benamidar (the nominal owner).
The person who provides the consideration and enjoys the benefits is the real owner.
Why are Benami Transactions Problematic?
Used to conceal ownership of property.
Help in tax evasion, money laundering, and illegal accumulation of wealth.
Distorts economic and legal transparency.
Legal Framework for Benami Transactions in India
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988
Prohibited benami transactions but had limited enforcement power.
Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016
Strengthened the law.
Criminalized benami transactions.
Provided authorities with power to investigate, seize, and confiscate benami properties.
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002
Overlaps because benami properties often constitute proceeds of crime.
Properties identified under Benami law can be attached under PMLA as proceeds of crime.
Overlaps Between Benami Law and PMLA
Both laws target illegally held or acquired assets.
PMLA covers money laundering offences, and benami properties are often laundered assets.
Enforcement agencies use both statutes to confiscate and prosecute.
Important Case Laws on Benami Transactions and PMLA
1. K.S. Jagannathan v. Union of India, (2017) 2 SCC 720
Facts:
Petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016.
Judgment:
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Act. It held that:
The Act is a valid exercise of the state’s power.
It empowers authorities to identify and confiscate benami properties.
Criminalization is necessary to curb tax evasion and black money.
Significance:
Confirms the legal framework for criminalizing benami transactions.
2. N. Vittal Rao v. Union of India (2019) SCC OnLine SC 1086
Facts:
The accused was found holding property in benami names, with proceeds suspected to be laundered money.
Judgment:
Court upheld attachment of benami property under both Benami Act and PMLA. It held that:
Benami transactions are an important aspect of money laundering.
Dual enforcement is permissible.
Overlapping jurisdiction does not violate principles of natural justice.
3. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (1985) 154 ITR 661 (SC)
Facts:
This is a classic benami case dealing with the ownership of property.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that where the purchase consideration is paid by one person but the property is held by another, the beneficial ownership lies with the person who paid.
Significance:
Forms the basis for identifying benami transactions.
4. Union of India v. Ramesh Chander Sharma, (2014) 6 SCC 252
Facts:
The accused was alleged to have acquired benami properties and laundered money through shell companies.
Judgment:
The court allowed attachment of benami properties under PMLA and held that:
Benami transactions facilitate money laundering.
Authorities have power to confiscate under PMLA.
5. Shahid Balwa v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2015) 8 SCC 273
Facts:
In a money laundering case, benami properties were traced.
Judgment:
Court upheld confiscation under PMLA and Benami law. It emphasized that:
Benami transactions enable the concealment of illegal wealth.
Combined use of both laws strengthens the fight against economic offences.
6. Union of India v. M/s. Vijay Kumar and Sons (2018)
Facts:
This case involved large-scale benami transactions linked with illegal mining and laundering proceeds.
Judgment:
Court endorsed coordinated enforcement using Benami Act and PMLA. It ordered confiscation and heavy penalties.
Summary of Legal Principles on Benami Transactions & PMLA
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Definition | Property held in name of one person but paid by another, concealing real ownership. |
| Criminalization | Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 criminalizes such transactions. |
| Enforcement Powers | Authorities can investigate, attach, and confiscate benami properties. |
| Overlaps with PMLA | Benami properties often treated as proceeds of crime under PMLA and attached accordingly. |
| Judicial Support | Courts uphold constitutionality and allow dual enforcement of both laws. |
| Objective | Curb black money, tax evasion, and money laundering via hidden assets. |
Concluding Remarks
Benami Transactions law is a powerful weapon against black money.
The PMLA complements this by targeting money laundering linked to benami properties.
The judiciary has consistently supported strong enforcement.
Coordination between agencies under both laws is crucial.
RELATED Blog
0 comments