Money Laundering Via Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain, And Digital Wallets
🔹 I. Understanding Money Laundering in Digital Assets
1. Definition
Money Laundering (ML): Process of disguising the origins of illegally obtained money to make it appear legitimate.
Digital Asset Money Laundering: Use of cryptocurrencies, blockchain platforms, and digital wallets to transfer, convert, or conceal illicit funds.
2. Modus Operandi
| Method | Description |
|---|---|
| Layering via crypto exchanges | Converting illicit funds into cryptocurrencies, moving across multiple wallets. |
| Mixers/Tumblers | Services that mix coins from multiple users to obscure transaction origins. |
| Peer-to-Peer Transfers | Direct wallet-to-wallet transfers, bypassing regulated exchanges. |
| NFTs and tokenization | Using non-fungible tokens to store or launder value. |
| Cross-border transfers | Sending crypto across jurisdictions to evade detection. |
3. Legal Framework in India
Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002
Section 3: Offense of money laundering
Section 4: Punishment for money laundering
Admissibility of digital transaction records
Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 43 & 66: Unauthorized access or hacking used to obtain illicit crypto funds
Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999
Regulates cross-border cryptocurrency transactions
RBI Guidelines
Cryptocurrency not considered legal tender; exchanges must follow KYC/AML compliance
🔹 II. Key Case Laws
Case 1: Enforcement Directorate vs. Unocoin Exchange (2020–2021)
Facts:
ED investigated Unocoin, an Indian crypto exchange, for allegedly facilitating laundering of illicit funds via cryptocurrency trades.
Held:
ED invoked PMLA sections 3 and 4; the exchange was instructed to maintain strict KYC and AML compliance.
Significance:
Highlighted the regulatory responsibility of crypto exchanges in preventing money laundering.
Case 2: BTC-e Exchange Case (International, 2017)
Facts:
BTC-e, a global crypto exchange, allegedly facilitated laundering of billions in illegal funds including ransomware payments.
Held:
US authorities seized $110 million and indicted operators under money laundering and conspiracy charges.
Significance:
Demonstrates cross-border money laundering risks and importance of blockchain tracking for enforcement.
Case 3: WazirX Cryptocurrency Investigation (India, 2022)
Facts:
ED and Indian authorities probed WazirX for alleged flow of illicit funds via its platform using Indian and foreign wallets.
Held:
Exchanges were required to report suspicious transactions and comply with AML regulations.
Significance:
Reinforces that even regulated Indian platforms must comply with PMLA.
Case 4: OneCoin Pyramid Scheme Case (Global, 2014–2022)
Facts:
OneCoin marketed as a cryptocurrency but functioned as a Ponzi scheme, laundering billions globally.
Held:
Courts in the US, Germany, and Bulgaria convicted founders under money laundering, fraud, and securities violations.
Significance:
Shows how blockchain scams can facilitate cross-border laundering.
Case 5: Liberty Reserve Case (International, 2013)
Facts:
Liberty Reserve, an online digital currency platform, used to launder $6 billion.
Held:
US authorities shut down the platform; founders prosecuted under money laundering, conspiracy, and operating unlicensed financial service.
Significance:
Illustrates the use of digital wallets and e-currencies for large-scale laundering.
Case 6: BitConnect Case (International, 2016–2021)
Facts:
BitConnect platform operated as crypto lending and investment scheme, moving funds through blockchain to hide illegal gains.
Held:
SEC and international authorities acted for fraud, unregistered securities, and laundering.
Significance:
Highlights risk of emerging digital platforms being exploited for laundering.
Case 7: Indian Dark Web Crypto Laundering Cases (2021–2023)
Facts:
Indian police and ED identified darknet marketplaces using crypto wallets for illicit drug, arms, and extortion payments.
Held:
Investigators invoked PMLA, IT Act, and IPC Sections 420/406; wallet tracing and blockchain analytics helped identify perpetrators.
Significance:
Demonstrates the evolving threat of digital currencies in local criminal ecosystems.
🔹 III. Key Legal Principles from Cases
| Principle | Case Example | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Crypto exchanges are liable for AML compliance | Unocoin, WazirX | Exchanges must maintain KYC and suspicious transaction reports |
| Cross-border laundering requires international cooperation | BTC-e, Liberty Reserve | Enforcement requires cooperation between agencies |
| Blockchain analytics can trace illicit transactions | BitConnect, Dark Web cases | Technological tools crucial for investigation |
| Ponzi and scam schemes often use crypto for laundering | OneCoin, BitConnect | Regulatory oversight essential |
| Digital wallets can be criminal conduits | Liberty Reserve, Dark Web | AML regulations should cover all digital asset storage |
🔹 IV. Investigative and Enforcement Measures
Blockchain Forensics – Tracking wallet addresses and transaction flows.
Exchange Cooperation – Legal requests for KYC data.
Suspicious Transaction Reports (STR) – Filing under PMLA.
Cross-Border Coordination – International law enforcement cooperation.
Freeze & Seizure Orders – Temporary blocking of accounts or wallets linked to laundering.
Digital Wallet Tracing – Monitoring P2P transactions and mixer services.
🔹 V. Challenges
Anonymity and pseudo-anonymity of blockchain addresses
Rapidly evolving DeFi platforms
Cross-border enforcement difficulties
Limited regulatory coverage in certain jurisdictions
Use of mixers and privacy coins to obscure fund origins
🧩 Conclusion
Cryptocurrencies, blockchain, and digital wallets offer convenience but are increasingly exploited for money laundering.
Indian and international case law demonstrates:
Exchanges and platforms are responsible for AML compliance.
Blockchain forensics is critical for investigation.
Cross-border cooperation is necessary due to globalized digital financial systems.
Preventive frameworks under PMLA, IT Act, and RBI guidelines are essential to combat laundering in the digital era.
RELATED Blog
0 comments