Election Fraud Prosecutions
1. United States v. McCormick (2013)
Facts:
McCormick, a campaign official in a local election, was accused of instructing supporters to submit absentee ballots in other voters’ names and filling out ballots on behalf of voters without their consent.
Legal Issues:
Violations of federal election fraud statutes, including illegal absentee ballot handling and false registration.
Outcome:
Convicted of multiple counts of election fraud and sentenced to prison.
The case emphasized federal authority over absentee ballot fraud.
Significance:
Showed how absentee ballot fraud undermines electoral integrity.
Affirmed that federal election laws can be used to prosecute local election fraud.
2. State of Pennsylvania v. Flynn (2010)
Facts:
Flynn was charged with tampering with voting machines and altering vote counts during a county election.
Legal Issues:
State charges of tampering with voting equipment and conspiracy to commit election fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to probation.
The prosecution highlighted the importance of secure and tamper-proof voting machines.
Significance:
Demonstrated state-level commitment to preventing physical interference with election infrastructure.
3. United States v. Davis (2016)
Facts:
Davis was part of a scheme to falsify absentee ballots in a state election, collecting unsealed ballots and forging voter signatures.
Legal Issues:
Charged under federal mail fraud and election fraud statutes.
Outcome:
Pleaded guilty; sentenced to prison.
The case involved forensic handwriting analysis and mail interception.
Significance:
Reinforced federal tools for combating absentee ballot and mail-based election fraud.
4. State of Georgia v. Smith (2014)
Facts:
Smith was accused of illegal voter registration activities, including submitting false registration forms and registering ineligible voters.
Legal Issues:
Violations of state election laws relating to voter registration fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted and fined; sentenced to community service.
The court emphasized voter registration accuracy as essential to fair elections.
Significance:
Highlighted how voter registration fraud can affect election outcomes.
5. United States v. Lanier (2012)
Facts:
Lanier operated a voter intimidation campaign targeting minority voters to suppress turnout in federal elections.
Legal Issues:
Violations of the Voting Rights Act and federal election laws prohibiting voter intimidation.
Outcome:
Convicted on charges of voter intimidation and sentenced to prison.
Testimonies from affected voters were key evidence.
Significance:
Showed federal commitment to protecting voters’ rights and preventing intimidation.
6. State of Michigan v. Johnson (2017)
Facts:
Johnson was caught stuffing ballot boxes with fraudulent votes in a city council election.
Legal Issues:
Charged under Michigan election fraud statutes for ballot stuffing.
Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to jail time.
Evidence included surveillance footage and witness statements.
Significance:
Reinforced legal consequences for ballot stuffing as a direct attack on democracy.
Summary of Key Legal Tools in Election Fraud Prosecutions:
| Legal Statute/Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Federal Mail Fraud Statutes | Used when mail-in ballots or mail fraud involved. |
| Voting Rights Act | Prevents voter intimidation and discrimination. |
| State Election Fraud Laws | Address local election offenses like ballot tampering. |
| Voter Registration Laws | Prevent fraudulent registrations. |
| Voting Machine Tampering Laws | Prohibit interference with electronic or physical voting systems. |
Summary:
These cases illustrate the variety of election fraud types: absentee ballot fraud, voter intimidation, machine tampering, false registration, and ballot stuffing. Both federal and state prosecutors play roles, with federal laws covering broader interference or violations of federal elections and civil rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments