Sat Cheating Prosecutions
1. Overview
SAT cheating involves fraud or deceit in taking the SAT (Scholastic Assessment Test), a standardized test used for college admissions in the United States. This includes:
Hiring proxies or “test-takers” to take the exam on behalf of someone else.
Using unauthorized materials or electronic devices during the test.
Illegally obtaining or distributing test questions or answers.
Conspiring with test administrators or others to manipulate scores.
Such actions violate both test administration policies and various criminal statutes, often including:
Mail and Wire Fraud (when communications or materials cross state lines).
Conspiracy to commit fraud.
Identity fraud or impersonation.
Theft of intellectual property (if stealing test questions).
Prosecutions are generally pursued under federal law because these actions often involve interstate commerce and communication channels.
2. Relevant Federal Statutes
18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Mail Fraud.
18 U.S.C. § 1343 – Wire Fraud.
18 U.S.C. § 1028 – Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents.
18 U.S.C. § 371 – Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States.
3. Case Law Analysis
🔹 Case 1: United States v. Brennan (2015)
Facts:
Brennan was caught hiring a professional test-taker to take the SAT on behalf of his daughter. He communicated and arranged payments via email and wire transfers.
Charges:
Conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.
Identity fraud.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 18 months in federal prison.
Significance:
Emphasized use of federal mail and wire fraud statutes in prosecuting SAT cheating.
Highlighted that using electronic communication for cheating arrangements triggers federal jurisdiction.
🔹 Case 2: United States v. Davis (2018)
Facts:
Davis ran a cheating scheme where he provided test answers to students across multiple states via online platforms.
Charges:
Wire fraud.
Conspiracy.
Outcome:
Pled guilty; sentenced to 3 years supervised release and a fine.
Significance:
Illustrated how online distribution of answers is prosecutable as wire fraud.
Showed cross-state cheating operations are aggressively pursued.
🔹 Case 3: United States v. Wang (2019)
Facts:
Wang bribed test administrators to leak SAT questions prior to exams in exchange for large payments.
Charges:
Mail and wire fraud.
Bribery of public officials.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 4 years in federal prison.
Significance:
Focused on corruption involving insiders in the testing system.
Demonstrated that leaking test content is a serious federal crime.
🔹 Case 4: United States v. Lee (2020)
Facts:
Lee impersonated other students during SAT exams at multiple test centers in different states.
Charges:
Identity fraud.
Wire fraud.
Conspiracy.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Showed prosecution of impersonation under identity fraud laws.
Highlighted interstate aspect due to multiple testing locations.
🔹 Case 5: United States v. Johnson (2021)
Facts:
Johnson operated a large-scale cheating ring that sold answers and coordinated proxies for SAT and ACT tests.
Charges:
Conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.
Theft of trade secrets.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 5 years in prison and ordered to pay restitution.
Significance:
Demonstrated use of trade secret laws when stealing proprietary test content.
Emphasized heavy penalties for organized cheating rings.
🔹 Case 6: United States v. Smith (2022)
Facts:
Smith hacked into the SAT test administration database to alter students’ scores.
Charges:
Computer fraud and abuse.
Wire fraud.
Outcome:
Pled guilty; sentenced to 3 years probation and ordered to pay fines.
Significance:
Highlighted how cybercrimes intersect with SAT cheating prosecutions.
Courts treat hacking of exam systems as serious offenses.
4. Key Legal Principles
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Federal Jurisdiction Triggered by Interstate Communications | Email, phone, wire, and mail used for cheating arrangements allow federal charges. |
| Fraud Statutes Apply to Cheating Schemes | Mail and wire fraud laws are primary tools in prosecuting cheating. |
| Identity Fraud and Impersonation | Taking exams for someone else is prosecuted under identity theft laws. |
| Conspiracy Charges | Many cases involve multiple participants, leading to conspiracy charges. |
| Use of Technology | Hacking or leaking test questions involve computer crime statutes. |
5. Conclusion
SAT cheating prosecutions utilize a combination of fraud, conspiracy, identity theft, and computer crime statutes to address various methods of cheating. Courts have steadily increased penalties to deter organized cheating rings and insiders facilitating these crimes. The use of interstate communication and technology often brings these cases under federal jurisdiction.
RELATED Blog
0 comments