Landmark Judgments On Social Media Chats In Trials
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer, (2014) 10 SCC 473
Facts:
The case dealt with the admissibility of electronic evidence, including social media communications, under the Indian Evidence Act.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court clarified that electronic evidence must be proved in accordance with Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, which requires certification of authenticity.
Key Points:
Social media chats are electronic records and must comply with Section 65B to be admissible.
The certificate authenticating the electronic record is mandatory.
Without proper certification, such evidence is inadmissible.
2. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2018) 2 SCC 801
Facts:
In this case, the court emphasized the principles regarding electronic evidence and whether absence of Section 65B certificate should lead to automatic rejection.
Judgment:
The Court ruled that failure to produce the certificate under Section 65B is not fatal if the other party admits the electronic evidence or if the evidence is otherwise proved.
Significance:
Balanced approach to admissibility of social media chats.
Courts may consider contextual factors and corroborative evidence.
3. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti, 2004 (1) LW (Cri) 932
Facts:
The accused was prosecuted based on emails and chat messages used for cyberstalking and defamation.
Judgment:
The Madras High Court held that emails and online chats are valid evidence if properly authenticated. The court recognized online chats as a medium to commit offenses like defamation and criminal intimidation.
Significance:
Early recognition of digital conversations as substantive evidence.
Importance of verifying authenticity and origin of chats.
4. Mohd. Ajmal Amir Kasab v. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 9 SCC 1
Facts:
The trial of the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack involved extensive use of intercepted telephone conversations and electronic evidence.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court admitted electronic evidence including intercepted conversations, applying strict standards of authenticity and chain of custody.
Significance:
Set precedent for careful scrutiny of electronic evidence.
Reinforced the need for proper forensic methods and certification.
5. K.A. Abbas v. Union of India, AIR 1971 SC 481
Facts:
Though predating social media, this judgment is relevant for principles of privacy and freedom of speech related to communication.
Judgment:
The Court held that communications, including private ones, have constitutional protections but can be restricted for public order and morality.
Relevance to social media:
Courts balance between privacy of chats and their evidentiary use.
Foundation for later privacy and digital evidence jurisprudence.
6. Ankita Bhatia v. State of Maharashtra (2021) Bombay High Court
Facts:
Social media WhatsApp chats were produced as evidence in a criminal defamation and harassment case.
Judgment:
The Court held that WhatsApp chats, screenshots, and social media conversations are admissible, subject to authentication and consistency with other evidence.
Significance:
Accepted social media chats as credible evidence.
Emphasized the role of cross-examination and corroboration.
7. Arup Bhuyan v. State of Assam (2011) 8 SCC 618
Facts:
The case dealt with the use of phone calls and text messages in a criminal trial.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court discussed the need for proper authentication and adherence to procedural safeguards before electronic communications can be relied upon.
Summary of Judicial Principles on Social Media Chats in Trials:
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Section 65B Certification | Mandatory certification for electronic evidence admissibility. |
| Authentication & Chain of Custody | Proof of origin and integrity is essential for chats. |
| Privacy vs. Evidence | Balance between privacy rights and evidentiary value. |
| Corroboration | Social media chats should be corroborated with other evidence. |
| Contextual Admission | Courts may admit chats without certification if admitted by the opposing party or adequately proved otherwise. |
Conclusion:
Indian courts have evolved a nuanced approach towards social media chats as evidence, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory provisions like Section 65B, while also recognizing practical challenges and the importance of corroboration. These judgments ensure that digital evidence is reliable, authentic, and respects privacy concerns, contributing significantly to modern criminal and civil justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments