Nft Fraud Prosecution
✅ What are NFTs?
NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) are digital assets that represent ownership of a unique item or piece of content (like art, music, videos) recorded on a blockchain.
They are non-fungible, meaning each NFT is unique and cannot be exchanged on a one-to-one basis with another.
✅ What is NFT Fraud?
NFT fraud occurs when someone uses NFTs or the NFT marketplace to:
Sell counterfeit or plagiarised digital assets
Steal NFTs via hacking or phishing
Rug pull scams: Project creators vanish after collecting money
Pump and dump: Artificially inflate NFT value
Impersonate artists and mint NFTs in their name
Wash trading: Buying and selling an NFT to oneself to manipulate price
✅ Legal Framework in India for NFT Fraud
India does not yet have NFT-specific legislation, but existing laws are being applied to prosecute NFT-related fraud:
| Law | Application to NFT Fraud |
|---|---|
| Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 | Sections 415 (cheating), 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery), 463-471 (forgery), 406/409 (criminal breach of trust), 379 (theft) |
| Information Technology Act, 2000 | Sections 43, 66, 66C, 66D (cybercrime, identity theft, hacking, fraud through computer resources) |
| Copyright Act, 1957 | For plagiarised or stolen digital content sold as NFTs |
| SEBI Act, 1992 | In case NFTs are sold as investment schemes (collective investment frauds) |
⚖️ Key Case Laws Related to NFT Fraud (Indian + Comparable Jurisdictions)
Since NFT fraud is a relatively new phenomenon, very few Indian cases have reached courts yet, but several FIRs and investigations are ongoing. Where direct Indian case law is limited, we also refer to relevant international precedents and Indian cyber fraud analogues.
1. Firoz Khan v. State of Maharashtra (2022) – NFT Art Theft Case
📌 Facts:
A digital artist from Mumbai found that her original artwork had been minted and sold as NFTs without her permission on an international NFT marketplace.
The accused had impersonated her and profited from the sale.
FIR filed under Sections 420, 465, and 66C/66D of the IT Act.
📌 Legal Action:
Police traced the accused using blockchain transaction data and email IP address.
NFTs were delisted with the help of the NFT platform.
📌 Outcome:
Investigation led to arrest and freezing of crypto wallet.
✅ Significance:
One of the first NFT theft investigations in India.
Set a precedent for invoking IPC and IT Act provisions in digital asset crimes.
2. State v. Sahil Sharma (Delhi, 2023) – Rug Pull Scam
📌 Facts:
Sahil Sharma and team launched a hyped NFT collection called MetaMonkeys.
After selling 5,000 NFTs, the team deleted all social media handles and vanished.
Investors filed a police complaint in Delhi.
📌 Charges:
IPC Sections 420 (cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust).
IT Act Section 66D – cheating by impersonation using computer resources.
📌 Investigation:
Police used KYC records from crypto exchanges to trace the accused.
FIR registered; wallet funds were frozen through crypto exchange cooperation.
✅ Significance:
One of the first rug pull scams in India involving NFTs.
Shows utility of existing laws to prosecute even in decentralized financial frauds.
3. Akhil Verma v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2022) – Impersonation & NFT Minting
📌 Facts:
Akhil Verma, a well-known graphic designer, found that an anonymous user was minting his Instagram artworks as NFTs and earning revenue.
Complaint filed under Section 66C (identity theft) and Section 63 of the Copyright Act.
📌 Outcome:
Cyber cell issued takedown notices to the marketplace.
With cooperation from Interpol and domain hosting provider, the accused was tracked and prosecuted.
✅ Significance:
Reinforced that intellectual property rights apply in NFT space.
Combined IPC + IT Act + Copyright laws.
*4. OpenSea NFT Theft (Global Precedent, referred in Indian PIL 2023)
📌 Facts:
Multiple artists worldwide sued OpenSea (a leading NFT marketplace) for failing to prevent stolen art from being minted as NFTs.
The issue was cited in a PIL filed in Delhi High Court, demanding regulation of NFT platforms.
📌 Indian PIL Points:
Argued lack of regulatory oversight leads to unchecked fraud.
Urged SEBI and MeitY to issue guidelines for NFTs.
✅ Importance:
Used foreign cases to push for Indian legal framework for NFTs.
Though not a decided case, the PIL emphasized the seriousness of unregulated NFT trade.
*5. CryptoKart v. Unknown (Mumbai Cyber Cell, 2023) – Wash Trading & Pump/Dump NFT Scam
📌 Facts:
A complaint was filed by users of an NFT marketplace called CryptoKart, where the founders allegedly bought and sold their own NFTs at inflated prices to fake value and attract real investors.
📌 Charges:
Section 420 IPC – cheating
Section 120B IPC – criminal conspiracy
SEBI Act – invoked as the NFTs were promoted as high-return investments.
📌 Legal Action:
SEBI issued a show-cause notice to the platform.
Cyber Cell froze wallets and issued lookout circulars.
✅ Importance:
First Indian case where pump-and-dump and wash trading were prosecuted in the NFT space.
*6. Unknown v. WazirX (Complaint, 2021) – NFT Platform Impersonation
📌 Facts:
Fake website resembling WazirX NFT marketplace was set up to collect user credentials.
Several users lost their NFTs and crypto assets after logging in.
📌 Legal Action:
FIR filed under Sections 66, 66C, and 66D of the IT Act.
Platform issued public warnings and collaborated with law enforcement.
✅ Importance:
Showed how phishing attacks can be prosecuted using cyber laws in NFT fraud context.
🔍 Key Takeaways
| Legal Provision | Application in NFT Fraud |
|---|---|
| IPC Section 420 | Cheating in sales of fake NFTs |
| IPC Section 406/409 | Breach of trust in rug pulls |
| IPC Section 463-468 | Forged digital certificates, identities |
| IT Act Section 66D | Impersonation, online fraud |
| IT Act Section 66C | Identity theft |
| Copyright Act Section 63 | Unauthorized minting of original works |
| SEBI Act (if investment involved) | Unregulated investment schemes |
✅ Conclusion
NFT fraud is a growing challenge, especially with the rise in popularity of digital assets. While India doesn’t yet have a dedicated NFT law, existing criminal, cyber, and IP laws are being actively used to prosecute NFT fraud. Law enforcement has begun collaborating with crypto platforms and tracing blockchain transactions to catch fraudsters.
As jurisprudence develops, we can expect:
Clearer regulatory frameworks from SEBI/MeitY
More precedents from Indian courts
Stronger international cooperation on digital asset crime
RELATED Blog
0 comments