Key Rulings By National Accountability Bureau (Nab)
Overview of NAB
NAB was established in 1999 to combat corruption and economic crimes.
It operates under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999.
It has the power to investigate, arrest, and prosecute corrupt individuals, including government officials and private citizens.
NAB cases are heard in special accountability courts.
Case 1: NAB vs. Nawaz Sharif (Panama Papers Case)
Background: Nawaz Sharif, former Prime Minister, was implicated in the Panama Papers leak, revealing offshore assets.
Charges: Alleged owning assets beyond known sources of income.
Ruling: Accountability courts convicted Nawaz Sharif in the Avenfield Apartments case (2018), sentencing him to prison and fines.
Appeals: Supreme Court later acquitted or reduced charges in some cases, but the NAB conviction was landmark for holding a sitting prime minister accountable.
Significance: First high-profile conviction based on evidence from international leaks; affirmed NAB’s role in politically sensitive cases.
Case 2: NAB vs. Asif Ali Zardari (Assets Beyond Means Case)
Background: Former President Asif Ali Zardari was accused of accumulating assets beyond known sources of income.
Charges: Money laundering, corruption.
Ruling: NAB filed multiple references; courts ordered freezing of assets and remanded Zardari in custody.
Outcome: Some cases are ongoing, but NAB successfully recovered substantial amounts of money.
Significance: Demonstrated NAB’s focus on top political figures and its efforts to recover illicit wealth.
Case 3: NAB vs. Raja Pervez Ashraf (Rental Power Projects Case)
Background: Allegations of corruption in awarding rental power projects during Raja Pervez Ashraf’s tenure as Prime Minister.
Charges: Corruption and abuse of authority.
Ruling: Accountability courts framed charges; however, Raja Pervez Ashraf denied wrongdoing.
Outcome: Case is pending, showing NAB’s efforts to investigate corruption in government contracts.
Significance: Highlighted NAB’s role in scrutinizing government procurement processes.
Case 4: NAB vs. Fawad Chaudhry (Assets Case)
Background: Fawad Chaudhry, a prominent politician, was investigated for allegedly holding assets disproportionate to income.
Charges: Accumulation of illegal wealth.
Ruling: NAB initially arrested and questioned him; courts granted bail; case is under investigation.
Significance: Showed NAB’s expanding scope to mid-level politicians and public figures.
Case 5: NAB vs. Former Director General (DG) National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) (Corruption Case)
Background: Allegations of corruption and mismanagement in NADRA involving procurement irregularities.
Charges: Corruption, misuse of authority.
Ruling: NAB filed references; the accused were remanded and trial is ongoing.
Significance: Demonstrated NAB’s focus on bureaucratic corruption beyond political circles.
Case 6: NAB vs. Sheikh Rashid Ahmed (Assets Case)
Background: Former Federal Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed was accused of holding assets beyond his known income.
Charges: Corruption.
Ruling: NAB initiated investigation; Sheikh Rashid was granted bail; case is ongoing.
Significance: Reinforced NAB’s investigative reach to government ministers.
Case 7: NAB vs. Corruption in Pakistan Steel Mills
Background: Allegations of embezzlement and mismanagement causing losses to Pakistan Steel Mills.
Charges: Corruption, abuse of power.
Ruling: NAB arrested multiple officials; accountability courts have sentenced some to prison.
Significance: Important example of NAB’s role in tackling corruption in state-owned enterprises.
Key Legal and Procedural Observations
Accountability Courts: NAB prosecutions are conducted in special accountability courts to expedite cases.
Burden of Proof: NAB must prove assets are disproportionate to income or corruption occurred.
Challenges: NAB faces criticism over selective accountability and political influence but remains central to anti-corruption efforts.
Appeals: Many NAB convictions are challenged in higher courts, leading to acquittals or reduced sentences.
Asset Recovery: A significant part of NAB’s mandate is recovering looted wealth and returning it to the state.
RELATED Blog
0 comments