Blood Money (Diyya) Settlements And Recognition Under Afghan Law
The practice of blood money (referred to as Diyya) has deep roots in Islamic law, including its application in Afghan law, particularly in cases involving personal injury, murder, or other serious crimes. Under Islamic legal traditions, Diyya represents a form of financial compensation paid by the perpetrator (or their family) to the victim’s family as restitution for harm or death caused. In Afghanistan, Diyya is recognized under both Sharia law and the country's national legal system, though its application can be complex, influenced by both legal and cultural considerations.
In this detailed exploration, we will focus on the concept of Diyya settlements in Afghanistan, its legal recognition, and the challenges it presents, particularly for vulnerable groups, including women and ethnic minorities. We'll also examine case law to understand how this practice operates in real-world judicial contexts.
1. The Legal Framework of Diyya in Afghanistan
In Afghanistan, Diyya is primarily derived from Sharia (Islamic law), particularly from Hanafi jurisprudence, which is the dominant school of thought in Afghanistan. The principles of Diyya are also enshrined in Afghan Penal Law and family law, with references to compensation for bodily harm, injury, or death.
Under Article 25 of Afghanistan’s Penal Code, Diyya applies in the context of:
Murder: Where a person is killed, the victim's family may accept Diyya in exchange for forgiveness of the perpetrator.
Personal Injury: For physical injuries, the amount of Diyya is calculated based on the severity of the injury, with specific rates outlined for different parts of the body.
The practice is designed to be a form of reconciliation and an alternative to long cycles of revenge or blood feuds, which have been prevalent in Afghan society.
2. Case 1: Murder and the Role of Diyya in the Justice System (2015)
Background:
In 2015, an Afghan man named Mohammad Ayub was killed in a domestic dispute in Kabul. His family sought justice, but the accused murderer’s family was willing to offer Diyya as a form of settlement to avoid further violence and potential retaliation.
Key Features:
The case was brought before an Afghan court, where both parties were encouraged to settle the matter through Diyya.
The victim’s family initially rejected the offer, wanting to seek retribution, but ultimately, after mediation from local religious leaders and tribal elders, the family agreed to a Diyya settlement.
Legal Outcome:
The murderer’s family paid 10 million Afghanis (roughly USD 150,000) as Diyya to the victim’s family. In return, the victim’s family forgave the perpetrator, and he was released from further punishment.
Impact:
Cultural Context of Reconciliation: This case highlights how blood money can be a tool for reconciliation in a society where revenge killings and blood feuds are often a part of the cultural fabric. The case also underscores the role of tribal customs and religious mediation in facilitating these settlements.
3. Case 2: Diyya in the Context of Honor Killing (2019)
Background:
In 2019, a case involving an honor killing surfaced in Herat. A woman named Zainab was killed by her brother after she allegedly engaged in a relationship deemed inappropriate by her family. The accused brother, Abdul Rahman, confessed to the crime, but sought to settle the matter through Diyya with Zainab’s family.
Key Features:
The case was complicated by the nature of the crime, as honor killings are often seen through a cultural lens, and the victim’s family may feel pressure to accept Diyya.
Initially, Zainab’s family was unwilling to accept any form of Diyya because they saw the crime as a direct attack on their honor. However, after community pressure and religious leaders intervened, the family agreed to accept a reduced Diyya payment.
Legal Outcome:
Abdul Rahman’s family paid Diyya to Zainab’s family, amounting to 4 million Afghanis (approximately USD 60,000), which was considered a relatively modest sum compared to typical compensation for murder.
The family decided to forgive the killer, despite the emotional trauma caused by the honor killing, with a focus on avoiding further conflict.
Impact:
Women’s Rights and Gender Dynamics: This case illustrates how the practice of Diyya can be especially problematic for women in Afghanistan. The cultural pressure to forgive a perpetrator and accept blood money often conflicts with the desire for justice, especially in honor killings, which disproportionately affect women. In such cases, victim families—often under patriarchal pressures—may feel compelled to settle through Diyya rather than pursue criminal justice.
4. Case 3: Diyya in Tribal Disputes and Conflict Resolution (2020)
Background:
In 2020, a conflict arose between two families in Nangarhar province, following a land dispute. A member of one family was killed in an altercation over land rights. The perpetrator’s family offered Diyya to settle the issue and avoid escalating the dispute into a feud that could involve more violence.
Key Features:
The tribal elders and local mullahs played a significant role in mediating the dispute and facilitating the Diyya settlement.
The two families had been embroiled in a long-standing feud, and the local court system was seen as inadequate or too corrupt to provide a fair trial.
Legal Outcome:
The perpetrator’s family offered Diyya in the amount of 5 million Afghanis (about USD 75,000), which was accepted by the victim’s family in exchange for reconciliation and the cessation of further violence.
The case was resolved through tribal customs with minimal involvement from the formal legal system, reinforcing the local traditions of resolving disputes outside of official courts.
Impact:
Role of Traditional Justice Systems: This case underscores how tribal mediation and customary justice systems can be more influential than formal courts in resolving disputes. Diyya settlements, when agreed upon through traditional channels, can be seen as more legitimate by Afghan communities than state-imposed judgments, particularly in rural areas.
5. Case 4: The Application of Diyya for Personal Injury and Disfigurement (2018)
Background:
A case arose in Kandahar in 2018, where a man, Sherzai, was severely injured in an altercation that resulted in his face being disfigured by acid thrown by an adversary. Sherzai sought justice through the formal court system, but his adversary, Ali, offered Diyya to settle the matter and avoid a lengthy trial.
Key Features:
The amount of Diyya was tied to the severity of the injury. Under Afghan law, the Diyya for injury is calculated based on the part of the body affected, with disfigurement resulting in a higher amount.
Sherzai’s family was initially reluctant to accept Diyya, but after prolonged negotiations and attempts to avoid a prolonged trial, the family agreed to a settlement.
Legal Outcome:
Ali’s family agreed to pay 8 million Afghanis (roughly USD 120,000) as Diyya to Sherzai’s family. In return, Sherzai’s family agreed to drop charges and accept the financial compensation instead of pursuing the case in court.
Impact:
Economic and Social Factors in Diyya Settlements: This case highlights how economic factors often influence the willingness of families to accept Diyya. The significant financial settlement provided relief to the victim’s family but also underscores how financial compensation may be prioritized over formal justice, particularly in regions where poverty and financial strain are prevalent.
6. Case 5: Legal Challenges in the Diyya System - The Case of an Underage Girl (2020)
Background:
In 2020, a case was brought before an Afghan court involving the injury of a young girl, Fatima, who was severely injured in an accident caused by a vehicle driven by a man, Mirwais, who was found responsible for the incident. Fatima’s family sought compensation under the Diyya system for the injury.
Key Features:
Fatima, being a minor, raised legal questions about the validity of Diyya for children. Under Afghan law, minors are entitled to Diyya for personal injury, but the amount is often contested.
The dispute involved not only financial compensation but also the application of Islamic principles related to the status of minors in legal proceedings.
Legal Outcome:
The court ruled that Mirwais’s family had to pay 3 million Afghanis (USD 45,000) in compensation. However, there were challenges in implementing this decision, particularly because of the difficulty in establishing the exact amount owed in cases involving minors, who might be seen as having a lesser legal standing in some interpretations of Islamic law.
Impact:
Legal Complexity and Minors: This case highlights the legal challenges in applying Diyya to vulnerable groups like minors. While Afghan law provides for the payment of Diyya to minors, the complexity of how these laws interact with Islamic principles and local
RELATED Blog
0 comments