Hazardous Waste Illegal Disposal Prosecutions
. United States v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania (1993)
Facts:
Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI), a major waste management company, was charged with illegal disposal of hazardous waste at multiple sites in Pennsylvania. Investigations revealed that BFI was mixing hazardous and non-hazardous wastes, then disposing of them in landfills that were not permitted for hazardous waste, violating RCRA regulations.
Legal Issues:
Whether corporate officers could be held criminally liable for corporate disposal practices.
Applicability of RCRA and Clean Water Act standards to landfill operations.
Outcome:
BFI pled guilty and agreed to pay over $10 million in fines.
Several corporate executives faced personal liability, setting a precedent for individual accountability in corporate hazardous waste violations.
Significance:
This case demonstrated that companies cannot hide behind corporate structures to avoid liability for hazardous waste violations.
2. United States v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. (1990s)
Facts:
Chemical Waste Management (CWM), a hazardous waste disposal company, illegally dumped chemical solvents and toxic sludge in unlined landfills in Texas. The contamination threatened groundwater and nearby communities.
Legal Issues:
Violations of RCRA Section 3008, which governs hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal.
The company attempted to falsify documentation to show compliance.
Outcome:
CWM pled guilty to multiple counts of illegal disposal.
Fined $5 million, and several managers were sentenced to jail terms for knowingly ignoring legal obligations.
Significance:
This case reinforced the principle that falsifying compliance records can be prosecuted as part of hazardous waste crimes.
3. United States v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (2000)
Facts:
Laidlaw Environmental Services, operating in the Southeastern U.S., illegally disposed of industrial sludge containing heavy metals in violation of EPA permits. Internal audits revealed deliberate attempts to evade waste tracking systems.
Legal Issues:
Determination of corporate criminal liability under RCRA.
Prosecution of executives for conscious disregard of environmental laws.
Outcome:
Laidlaw pled guilty to criminal RCRA violations.
Company was fined $21 million, and executive prison sentences were imposed.
This case led to a settlement with EPA requiring long-term monitoring and remediation.
Significance:
Highlighted the EPA’s increasing use of criminal penalties for corporate hazardous waste violations and the accountability of senior management.
4. United States v. Solvent Chemical Co. (1988)
Facts:
Solvent Chemical Co., a small chemical manufacturer, dumped used solvents containing benzene and other carcinogens into local rivers and unpermitted disposal sites.
Legal Issues:
Violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and RCRA.
Whether criminal negligence standards applied to a small company without prior violations.
Outcome:
The company was fined $1.5 million and ordered to clean contaminated sites.
The company president received one year in federal prison.
Significance:
Even small companies and first-time offenders are not immune from criminal prosecution for hazardous waste disposal.
5. United States v. Davis Scrap Metal & Iron Co. (2002)
Facts:
Davis Scrap Metal illegally disposed of cadmium and lead-laden waste in unlined lots, contaminating soil and groundwater near residential areas.
Legal Issues:
Prosecution under RCRA Section 3008(a)(3) and criminal provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d).
Proving willful intent to bypass legal disposal procedures.
Outcome:
The company and its owner were convicted of illegal disposal.
Ordered to pay $7 million in fines and fund remediation of contaminated properties.
Significance:
This case highlighted that RCRA enforcement includes both civil and criminal remedies, especially when public health is at risk.
6. United States v. McGhee (1991)
Facts:
An independent contractor, McGhee, illegally transported and dumped hazardous industrial waste from multiple factories in Tennessee without permits.
Legal Issues:
Liability of independent contractors for hazardous waste violations.
Extent of criminal penalties for illegal transport and disposal.
Outcome:
McGhee was sentenced to 4 years in federal prison, fined $500,000, and ordered to assist in cleanup operations.
Significance:
Demonstrated that individual contractors could face severe criminal consequences, even without corporate backing.
Key Takeaways Across Cases:
Corporate and individual liability: Both companies and executives can be held criminally accountable.
Severity of penalties: Fines often reach millions, and prison terms are imposed on individuals.
Environmental impact matters: Prosecution is more aggressive when human health or the environment is threatened.
Intent and negligence: Willful or knowing violations are prosecuted more severely; ignorance is rarely an excuse.
RCRA enforcement tools: The EPA uses both civil and criminal enforcement, including cleanup mandates and long-term monitoring.
RELATED Blog
0 comments