Resume Fraud With Criminal Liability
Overview: Resume Fraud and Criminal Liability
Resume fraud occurs when individuals falsify credentials, work experience, education, or professional achievements to gain employment, promotions, or other benefits. While some resume exaggerations may only trigger civil consequences, certain fraudulent acts carry criminal liability, particularly when they result in financial gain, government employment, or misuse of federal funds.
Relevant legal frameworks include:
Mail and Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. §§1341, 1343) – used when resumes or applications are submitted electronically or by mail to defraud employers or agencies.
False Statements (18 U.S.C. §1001) – applies when knowingly making false statements to federal agencies.
Fraud Against Federal Programs (18 U.S.C. §666) – applies if the individual obtains grants, contracts, or employment in government-funded positions based on false credentials.
State Criminal Fraud Laws – can be invoked for private sector employment fraud involving monetary damages.
Common types of criminally liable resume fraud:
Falsifying degrees, certifications, or licenses.
Fabricating prior employment history or job titles.
Claiming awards, security clearances, or professional achievements that don’t exist.
Misrepresenting qualifications for government positions or contracts.
Penalties include imprisonment, fines, and restitution.
Notable Cases
1. United States v. Adam Wheeler (2010) – Harvard Resume Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Massachusetts
Summary: Wheeler falsely claimed to have degrees from Harvard and MIT, secured high-level internship positions, and gained access to employer funds.
Violation: Wire fraud, mail fraud, and false statements to federal agencies.
Outcome: 2 years imprisonment; $60,000 restitution; lifetime ban from applying to government positions.
Significance: Demonstrated that resume fraud involving false degrees and misrepresentation to secure employment and access to funds can result in federal prosecution.
2. United States v. Monique Smith (2013) – Nursing License Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Florida
Summary: Smith submitted a forged nursing license and falsified work experience to obtain employment in a hospital receiving federal Medicare funds.
Violation: Wire fraud and fraud against a federally funded program (18 U.S.C. §666).
Outcome: 18 months imprisonment; $120,000 restitution.
Significance: Highlighted that resume fraud involving healthcare credentials can constitute criminal fraud when federal funds are involved.
3. United States v. Robert Lee Johnson (2015) – Federal Contractor Job Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Virginia
Summary: Johnson falsified military experience and security clearance to obtain a high-paying contractor role with access to classified information.
Violation: False statements to a federal agency (18 U.S.C. §1001) and wire fraud.
Outcome: 3 years imprisonment; security clearance permanently revoked.
Significance: Showed that falsifying qualifications for federal contractor positions can trigger criminal liability.
4. United States v. Patricia Allen (2016) – Teacher Credential Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, New York
Summary: Allen submitted fake teaching certificates and inflated work experience to gain employment in public schools.
Violation: Mail fraud, wire fraud, and fraud against a federally funded school program.
Outcome: 24 months imprisonment; $80,000 restitution; permanent ban from public school employment.
Significance: Resume fraud in education settings that misuses federal funds is prosecuted as a criminal offense.
5. United States v. Kevin Baker (2017) – Engineering Degree Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Texas
Summary: Baker falsely claimed an engineering degree and licensure to secure a position at a federally funded infrastructure project.
Violation: Wire fraud and false statements to a federal agency.
Outcome: 30 months imprisonment; $200,000 restitution; professional license revoked.
Significance: Demonstrated that resume fraud affecting federally funded contracts carries severe consequences.
6. United States v. Emily Carter (2018) – IT Contractor Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, California
Summary: Carter exaggerated technical certifications and prior IT experience to obtain a high-salary contract with the Department of Defense.
Violation: Wire fraud and false statements to a federal agency.
Outcome: 36 months imprisonment; $250,000 restitution; barred from government contracting.
Significance: Highlighted federal scrutiny on IT and cybersecurity roles obtained via fraudulent resumes.
7. United States v. Ahmed Khan (2020) – Medical Residency Fraud
Jurisdiction: Federal Court, New Jersey
Summary: Khan falsified medical school transcripts and letters of recommendation to secure a residency position at a hospital receiving federal funds.
Violation: Wire fraud, mail fraud, and fraud against a federally funded program.
Outcome: 4 years imprisonment; $150,000 restitution; license application denied.
Significance: Showed that resume fraud in medical and healthcare contexts carries heightened criminal risk.
Key Takeaways
Federal Positions or Funds Increase Liability: Fraud affecting government jobs, contracts, or federally funded programs triggers criminal liability.
Wire and Mail Fraud are Common Statutes Used: Electronic or mailed submissions of fraudulent resumes are prosecutable.
Restitution and License Revocation: Courts commonly order repayment and disbarment from professional practice.
Prison Terms are Substantial: Offenders often receive multi-year sentences.
High-Risk Professions: Healthcare, IT, engineering, and education roles carry heightened scrutiny due to public safety or federal funding involvement.
RELATED Blog
0 comments