College Admissions Bribery Prosecutions
What Is College Admissions Bribery?
College admissions bribery involves illegal payments or schemes to influence college admissions decisions. This often includes:
Bribing coaches to designate applicants as recruited athletes, regardless of athletic ability.
Paying standardized test administrators to cheat or falsify scores.
Bribing college officials or intermediaries to secure admission.
Falsifying application materials such as transcripts, resumes, or letters of recommendation.
Such actions violate laws against fraud, conspiracy, bribery, and honest services fraud.
Legal Framework
Most college admissions bribery cases are prosecuted under:
18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud)
18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud)
18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy)
18 U.S.C. § 666 (Theft or bribery concerning programs receiving federal funds)
These statutes are broad, allowing prosecutors to target schemes using mail, phone, and electronic communications.
Detailed Case Law Examples
1. United States v. William “Rick” Singer (2019)
Facts: Singer orchestrated a nationwide scheme called “Operation Varsity Blues,” bribing college officials and facilitating cheating on standardized tests. He ran a college counseling business that helped wealthy parents cheat or bribe their way into elite schools.
Charges: Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.
Outcome: Singer pled guilty and cooperated with prosecutors. Sentenced to 3.5 years in prison.
Significance: Central figure who exposed the widespread nature of bribery schemes in college admissions.
2. United States v. Lori Loughlin and Mossimo Giannulli (2019)
Facts: Actress Lori Loughlin and her husband paid $500,000 to have their daughters admitted as fake rowing recruits at USC.
Charges: Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.
Outcome: Loughlin pled guilty to a reduced charge and served 2 months in prison. Giannulli received 5 months.
Significance: High-profile case showing consequences for wealthy individuals abusing the admissions process.
3. United States v. Felicity Huffman (2019)
Facts: Huffman paid $15,000 to a test administrator to correct her daughter's SAT answers to increase her score.
Charges: Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.
Outcome: Huffman pled guilty, sentenced to 14 days in prison.
Significance: First major celebrity conviction in the scandal, underscoring the seriousness of test cheating schemes.
4. United States v. Douglas Hodge (2019)
Facts: Hodge paid $750,000 to have his child admitted as a recruited athlete for Stanford’s water polo team, despite lack of ability.
Charges: Conspiracy to commit mail fraud.
Outcome: Pled guilty; sentenced to 9 months in prison.
Significance: Demonstrated the use of athletic recruitment as a common bribery front.
5. United States v. Jane Does (Various) (2019-2020)
Facts: Multiple parents across the country were charged for paying bribes through Rick Singer's scheme to gain admission for their children at various elite universities including Yale, Georgetown, and UCLA.
Charges: Mail fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy.
Outcome: Pleas and sentences ranged from probation to prison terms depending on involvement and cooperation.
Significance: Showed the national scale and variety of colleges involved in the scheme.
6. United States v. Mark Riddell (2021)
Facts: Riddell, a test administrator, accepted bribes to facilitate cheating on standardized tests.
Charges: Conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud.
Outcome: Sentenced to over a year in prison.
Significance: Highlighted the role of insiders in facilitating the cheating and bribery schemes.
Summary Table
| Case Name | Year | Charges | Outcome | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Rick Singer | 2019 | Conspiracy, mail fraud | Guilty, 3.5 years prison | Central orchestrator |
| United States v. Lori Loughlin | 2019 | Conspiracy, mail fraud | Guilty, 2 months prison | High-profile celebrity prosecution |
| United States v. Felicity Huffman | 2019 | Conspiracy, mail fraud | Guilty, 14 days prison | First major test cheating conviction |
| United States v. Douglas Hodge | 2019 | Conspiracy, mail fraud | Guilty, 9 months prison | Athletic recruitment as bribery front |
| Various Parents (Jane Does) | 2019-20 | Mail/wire fraud, conspiracy | Various, prison/probation | Widespread, multi-school involvement |
| United States v. Mark Riddell | 2021 | Conspiracy, mail fraud | Guilty, 1+ year prison | Insider facilitating test cheating |
Additional Notes
Plea bargains were common; cooperation often reduced sentences.
Courts emphasized the betrayal of public trust and unfair advantage in admissions.
Colleges involved took steps to reform admissions processes.
Cases often involved multiple charges, including money laundering or tax evasion related to bribe payments.
RELATED Blog
0 comments