Fake Documents For Immigration Prosecutions
⚖️ Legal Definition
Fake or fraudulent immigration documents refer to forged, counterfeited, or unlawfully obtained documents used to gain an immigration benefit — such as visas, green cards, work permits, or U.S. citizenship.
📜 Major U.S. Federal Statutes:
18 U.S.C. § 1546 — Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other immigration documents.
18 U.S.C. § 371 — Conspiracy to defraud the United States.
8 U.S.C. § 1324c — Document fraud for employment authorization or immigration benefits.
18 U.S.C. § 1028 — Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents.
8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3) — Entry into the U.S. by willfully misrepresenting or concealing a material fact.
🧑⚖️ Detailed Case Law Examples
Case 1: United States v. Ochoa-Gonzalez, 2012 (Fifth Circuit)
Facts:
Ochoa-Gonzalez, a Mexican national, used a counterfeit Permanent Resident Card (Green Card) to obtain employment and later to apply for government benefits. He purchased the document in Texas for $400.
Charges:
Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) (fraud and misuse of immigration documents).
Court’s Decision:
He was convicted and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment and deportation after completion. The court ruled that intent to use a document to deceive U.S. authorities—even for employment—constitutes immigration document fraud.
Significance:
Reaffirmed that any use of forged immigration documents, even for work, is a federal offense regardless of whether the person entered the country legally.
Case 2: United States v. Santos, 2009 (Second Circuit)
Facts:
Defendant Santos operated an illegal business in New York that created fake Puerto Rican birth certificates and Social Security cards for immigrants. The documents were used to apply for U.S. passports and permanent residence.
Charges:
Conspiracy to defraud the U.S. (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Visa and document fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1546)
Outcome:
He was sentenced to 7 years in prison and ordered to forfeit profits gained from document sales.
Significance:
Established that manufacturing or distributing fake immigration documents carries equal liability to using them. It emphasized the conspiratorial intent behind such operations.
Case 3: United States v. Aladekoba, 2016 (Maryland District Court)
Facts:
A Nigerian national used forged student visa documents (I-20 forms) and fake university admission letters to enter the U.S. He also provided them to others for a fee.
Charges:
Document fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1546
Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)
Identity fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1028)
Court Ruling:
He received a 9-year prison sentence. The court held that falsified educational and visa documents constituted material misrepresentations intended to deceive U.S. immigration authorities.
Significance:
Confirmed that student visa fraud using forged admission letters is equally punishable under immigration fraud statutes.
Case 4: United States v. Pineda-Cortez, 2014 (Tenth Circuit)
Facts:
Pineda-Cortez purchased a fraudulent employment authorization card (EAD) and Social Security number. He used them to secure employment at a U.S. meatpacking plant.
Charges:
Possession of counterfeit immigration documents (§ 1546)
Use of false identity (§ 1028)
Court Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to two years imprisonment. The court emphasized that employment-related use of fake immigration papers constitutes both immigration and identity document fraud.
Significance:
Important precedent clarifying that employment misuse of forged immigration papers is a crime even without illegal entry.
Case 5: United States v. Mashaev, 2011 (Northern District of Georgia)
Facts:
A Georgian national ran a “visa mill” scheme, fabricating documents such as fake marriage certificates and asylum claims to help other immigrants obtain visas illegally.
Charges:
Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Visa fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1546)
False statements to federal officials (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
Court Decision:
He was convicted and sentenced to 11 years imprisonment.
The court stated that creating fraudulent evidence for immigration benefit applications is one of the most serious forms of immigration fraud.
Significance:
Set a standard for prosecuting immigration service providers and intermediaries who facilitate visa fraud through falsified documentation.
Case 6: United States v. Diaz-Maldonado, 2019 (Southern District of California)
Facts:
Diaz-Maldonado and his associates operated a border smuggling ring using fake Mexican passports and U.S. entry visas to help migrants enter through legal checkpoints.
Charges:
Document fraud (§ 1546)
Smuggling aliens (§ 1324)
Conspiracy (§ 371)
Outcome:
Sentenced to 15 years in federal prison.
The court found that using or providing fraudulent immigration documents to facilitate illegal entry amounts to both smuggling and document fraud.
Significance:
Illustrated that document forgery combined with illegal entry schemes results in enhanced penalties.
Case 7: United States v. Demetrio Gonzalez-Lopez, 2020 (Western District of Texas)
Facts:
Gonzalez-Lopez, a notary public, sold fake asylum claim packages and forged supporting affidavits to undocumented migrants.
Charges:
Visa fraud (§ 1546)
Mail fraud (§ 1341)
Aiding and abetting false statements (§ 2)
Court’s Ruling:
He was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment.
The judge emphasized that knowingly helping others submit false immigration paperwork constitutes active participation in federal document fraud.
Significance:
Reinforced accountability for immigration consultants or intermediaries who knowingly prepare fake applications.
Case 8: United States v. Chavarria-Brito, 2008 (Eighth Circuit)
Facts:
Chavarria-Brito was caught using a fake lawful permanent resident card and a fraudulent Social Security card during an ICE raid.
Charges:
Use and possession of counterfeit immigration documents (§ 1546)
Misuse of identification documents (§ 1028)
Court Outcome:
Convicted and sentenced to 30 months imprisonment and removal.
The appellate court upheld the conviction, finding that intentional possession and use of fake documents constitutes sufficient evidence of fraud.
Significance:
Clarified the burden of proof for “intent to deceive” under document fraud statutes.
Case 9: United States v. Singh, 2018 (Northern District of California)
Facts:
An Indian national submitted forged tax and employment documents in support of an H-1B visa extension petition.
Charges:
Visa fraud (§ 1546)
False statements (§ 1001)
Outcome:
He received a 5-year sentence and deportation.
The court highlighted that even supporting documents (like fake job letters or payroll statements) constitute material misrepresentation in immigration filings.
Significance:
Emphasized that fraud in supporting paperwork — not just visas — is prosecutable.
📘 Key Legal Takeaways
Intent to Deceive — The prosecution must show the defendant knowingly used or produced false documents to gain an immigration benefit.
Broad Definition — Fake IDs, work permits, asylum papers, or supporting letters all qualify under § 1546.
Aiding and Abetting — Intermediaries and notaries who assist others face the same penalties.
Combination Offenses — Often prosecuted alongside identity theft, mail fraud, and conspiracy.
Severe Penalties — Typically involve imprisonment, fines, forfeiture of profits, and deportation after sentence completion.
No Need for Benefit Completion — Even attempting to use a fake immigration document is punishable.
RELATED Blog
0 comments