Darknet Marketplace Prosecutions

🔍 Darknet Marketplace Prosecutions: Overview

Darknet marketplaces are online platforms—often hosted on the Tor network—that facilitate anonymous transactions of illicit goods using cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Monero. U.S. law enforcement agencies, including the FBI, DEA, IRS-CI, Homeland Security, and Postal Inspection Service, have pursued these operations aggressively, using undercover agents, blockchain analysis, and international cooperation.

Common charges include:

Conspiracy to commit drug trafficking

Money laundering

Computer fraud and abuse

Operating an unlicensed money transmitting business

Identity theft and access device fraud

1. United States v. Ross Ulbricht ("Silk Road") – 2013

Background:
Ross Ulbricht created and operated Silk Road, the first major darknet marketplace. It facilitated the anonymous sale of narcotics, hacking tools, and other contraband between 2011 and 2013.

Charges:

Conspiracy to distribute narcotics

Computer hacking

Money laundering

Continuing criminal enterprise (CCE) — a charge usually reserved for drug kingpins

Prosecution Approach:

Undercover agents made controlled buys on Silk Road.

Ulbricht was identified as "Dread Pirate Roberts" through digital footprints, IP address analysis, and seized laptops.

Bitcoin blockchain tracing linked Ulbricht to profits.

Forum postings and journal entries served as self-incriminating evidence.

Defense Arguments:

Claimed Ulbricht created the site but others took over.

Alleged government misconduct and lack of direct evidence.

Outcome:

Convicted on all counts in 2015.

Sentenced to life in prison without parole.

Legal Lesson:
Running a darknet marketplace—even without personally selling illegal goods—can trigger the "kingpin" CCE charge, leading to life imprisonment.

2. United States v. Gal Vallerius ("OxyMonster") – 2017

Background:
Gal Vallerius, a French national, was a vendor and moderator on the darknet marketplace Dream Market, using the alias “OxyMonster” to sell opioids and manage other vendors.

Charges:

Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances

Importation of controlled substances

Money laundering

Prosecution Approach:

DEA tracked shipments and cryptocurrency transactions.

Vallerius was arrested upon arrival in the U.S. for a beard competition, carrying his laptop.

His computer was open and unencrypted, revealing Dream Market credentials and PGP keys.

Monero and Bitcoin wallets were traced to sales.

Defense Arguments:

No specific challenge to evidence; opted to plead guilty.

Outcome:

Pleaded guilty in 2018.

Sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2019.

Legal Lesson:
Even anonymous moderators and vendors on darknet markets can face full liability for distribution and conspiracy.

3. United States v. Blake Benthall ("Silk Road 2.0") – 2014

Background:
After Silk Road was shut down, Silk Road 2.0 launched with similar infrastructure. Blake Benthall, using the alias “Defcon,” was its alleged operator.

Charges:

Conspiracy to commit narcotics trafficking

Computer hacking

Money laundering

Trafficking in fraudulent documents

Prosecution Approach:

Undercover federal agents infiltrated the staff.

Admin credentials and IP leaks led back to Benthall.

His email and financial accounts were traced.

Operation included collaboration with European cybercrime units.

Defense Arguments:

Initially denied knowledge but cooperated later.

Outcome:

Pleaded guilty in 2015.

Received a reduced sentence (reportedly without prison time) due to cooperation.

Legal Lesson:
Rapid re-creation of darknet markets can lead to fast identification and prosecution due to prior law enforcement experience and improved cyber tools.

4. United States v. Alexandre Cazes ("AlphaBay") – 2017

Background:
AlphaBay became the largest darknet marketplace after Silk Road, facilitating the sale of drugs, weapons, malware, and counterfeit IDs.

Charges:

Conspiracy to engage in racketeering

Distribution of narcotics

Access device fraud

Identity theft

Money laundering

Prosecution Approach:

Law enforcement infiltrated the marketplace.

Identified Cazes via an unencrypted welcome email.

Arrested in Thailand; laptops and wallets were seized.

Traced over $23 million in Bitcoin and other assets.

Outcome:

Cazes died by apparent suicide in Thai custody in 2017 before extradition.

The case proceeded against other AlphaBay vendors.

Legal Lesson:
Operational mistakes, such as using personal email accounts, can compromise even well-secured darknet operations.

5. United States v. Aaron Shamo – 2016

Background:
Aaron Shamo operated a drug trafficking operation through the darknet, selling counterfeit pills (often laced with fentanyl) from his basement via a website and darknet forums.

Charges:

Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances

Importation of controlled substances

Engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise

Money laundering

Prosecution Approach:

Evidence included pill presses, shipping records, Bitcoin wallets.

Over 90,000 pills seized.

Law enforcement used buyer testimony and package tracking.

Deaths linked to his fentanyl-laced pills supported serious charges.

Defense Arguments:

Claimed he didn’t know about the presence of fentanyl.

Blamed co-defendants.

Outcome:

Convicted in 2019.

Facing life imprisonment, sentencing delayed due to legal disputes.

Legal Lesson:
High-volume darknet drug dealing, especially involving fentanyl, is treated akin to traditional cartel-level offenses.

6. United States v. Matthew Phan – 2019 (Silk Road Vendor Case)

Background:
Matthew Phan was a vendor on Silk Road and AlphaBay, selling drugs and hacking tools. Authorities tracked his Bitcoin sales to dark web marketplaces.

Charges:

Drug trafficking

Possession of illegal weapons

Operating an online illegal enterprise

Prosecution Approach:

Blockchain analysis linked wallet addresses to marketplace activity.

Evidence from seized devices showed active vendor accounts.

Firearms and narcotics found in his home.

Outcome:

Convicted; sentenced to several years in prison.

Over $1.4 million in Bitcoin seized and forfeited.

Legal Lesson:
Even mid-level vendors can face serious consequences, and cryptocurrency tracing is now a powerful prosecution tool.

7. United States v. Galvin Pelton – 2020

Background:
Pelton sold stolen data and hacking tools via darknet forums and marketplaces, including carding forums.

Charges:

Wire fraud

Identity theft

Conspiracy

Prosecution Approach:

Undercover agents purchased data from Pelton.

Used server seizures and IP tracing.

Recovered large volumes of personally identifiable information (PII).

Outcome:

Convicted and sentenced to 8 years.

Ordered to pay restitution to victims of identity theft.

Legal Lesson:
Selling digital contraband on darknet (not just drugs) is treated as serious cybercrime with lengthy sentences.

🧾 Summary Table of Key Cases

CaseMarketplaceOutcomeKey Takeaway
Ross UlbrichtSilk RoadLife sentenceMarketplace creators face top-tier federal charges
Gal Vallerius ("OxyMonster")Dream Market20 years in prisonMods and vendors equally liable
Blake Benthall ("Defcon")Silk Road 2.0Pleaded guilty, leniencyFBI infiltrated site quickly
Alexandre CazesAlphaBayDied before trialOperational errors exposed identity
Aaron ShamoIndependentConvicted; life sentence likelyDarknet opioids linked to overdose deaths
Matthew PhanSilk Road, AlphaBayMulti-year sentence + asset seizureVendors traceable via blockchain
Galvin PeltonVarious forums8 years in prisonHacking tools + stolen data are federal crimes

⚖️ Common Legal Charges in Darknet Market Cases

21 U.S.C. § 846 – Conspiracy to distribute controlled substances

18 U.S.C. § 1956 – Money laundering

18 U.S.C. § 1030 – Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) violations

18 U.S.C. § 1028 – Identity theft and access device fraud

Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) under 21 U.S.C. § 848

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments