Whatsapp Chats Admissibility
π What is WhatsApp Chat Admissibility?
WhatsApp chats are electronic records containing messages exchanged between parties. They often play a crucial role in civil and criminal disputesβwhether in proving consent, conspiracy, defamation, or contractual terms.
However, for these chats to be admitted as evidence in court, certain legal requirements must be met to establish:
Authenticity
Integrity (unaltered nature)
Proper identification of parties
Chain of custody
π Legal Framework Governing WhatsApp Chats Admissibility
1. Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act (introduced in 2000) governs the admissibility of electronic records.
For a WhatsApp chat (being an electronic record) to be admissible:
The electronic record must be produced with a certificate under Section 65B(4), stating details of the device, manner of collection, and authenticity.
The record must not have been tampered with.
2. Information Technology Act, 2000
Provides legal recognition to electronic records and digital signatures.
Validates electronic evidence when in compliance with IT Act rules.
3. Preservation of Evidence
The device or the phone from which the WhatsApp chat is extracted should be preserved.
Witness testimony or forensic expert opinion may be needed to confirm the authenticity.
βοΈ Key Case Laws on WhatsApp Chats Admissibility in India
1. Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer & Ors. (2014, Supreme Court)
π Facts:
The main issue was the admissibility of electronic evidence, including WhatsApp chats.
The respondent sought to rely on electronic documents to prove a point.
π§ββοΈ Supreme Court Holding:
Electronic records must comply with Section 65B.
A certificate as prescribed under Section 65B(4) is mandatory for admissibility.
Without such certificate, electronic evidence is inadmissible, even if parties admit its contents.
β Importance:
Landmark judgment clarifying the mandatory nature of 65B certificate.
WhatsApp chats must be accompanied by proper certification.
2. State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005, Supreme Court)
π Facts:
Although predates WhatsApp, established principles for electronic evidence and voice recordings.
π§ββοΈ Observations:
Laid down guidelines for proving electronic evidence authenticity.
Importance of chain of custody, original device preservation, and expert testimony.
β Significance:
Foundation for handling digital communication evidence like WhatsApp chats.
3. Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2018, Supreme Court)
π Facts:
The case emphasized the principle of best evidence rule for electronic evidence.
π§ββοΈ Judgment:
Court clarified that the original device or original electronic record should be produced unless good reason for non-production exists.
Secondary evidence like printouts or screenshots of WhatsApp chats can be admitted if originals arenβt available, but with caution.
β Takeaway:
Supports cautious acceptance of WhatsApp chat screenshots with proper justification.
4. Rajesh Bajaj v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill (Delhi High Court, 2018)
π Facts:
WhatsApp chats were produced as evidence to prove consent and communication between parties.
π§ββοΈ HC Observation:
Chats were accepted because they were:
Corroborated by witness testimony.
Verified by device forensics.
Accompanied by Section 65B certificate.
β Importance:
Shows courts accept WhatsApp chats as evidence if corroborated and properly certified.
5. Jayesh D. Nanavati v. Union of India (Supreme Court, 2021)
π Facts:
The petitioner challenged the validity of WhatsApp chats submitted as evidence in criminal proceedings.
π§ββοΈ Judgment:
Reiterated the necessity of Section 65B compliance.
Also held that authenticity is to be tested on facts; mere certification doesn't automatically mean proof.
β Key point:
The court evaluates authenticity in context, balancing technical and factual scrutiny.
6. Mukesh v. State (Delhi High Court, 2020)
π Facts:
WhatsApp chats produced in a sexual harassment case.
π§ββοΈ HC Ruling:
Accepted WhatsApp chats as relevant evidence.
Emphasized requirement of preservation of phones, examination of metadata, and cross-examination of parties.
β Impact:
Emphasized forensic examination for digital communication.
π‘οΈ Guidelines for Admissibility of WhatsApp Chats
| Requirement | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Section 65B Certificate | Must accompany electronic record (chat) to prove authenticity |
| Chain of Custody | Proper handling from phone/device to court |
| Original Device Preservation | Ideally the phone from which chats were extracted |
| Forensic Examination | Expert opinion on whether chats were tampered or fabricated |
| Corroboration | Witness testimony, other evidence supporting chats |
| Cross-examination | Parties should have the chance to test authenticity in court |
β Conclusion
WhatsApp chats are admissible evidence in Indian courts but only when they satisfy the strict legal conditions under Section 65B of the Evidence Act. Courts require:
Proper certification,
Preservation of devices,
Forensic verification,
Corroborative evidence.
Failure to meet these requirements often leads to exclusion of chat evidence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments