Knife Crime Prosecutions And Sentencing
Overview of Knife Crime Laws in the UK
Key Offences:
Possession of a knife or offensive weapon (usually without lawful authority or reasonable excuse) – Criminal Justice Act 1988, Section 139
Carrying a knife in public – Offensive Weapons Act 2019
Possession of a knife in a public place or school – Criminal Justice Act 1988, Section 141
Use of a knife in a violent offence (assault, GBH, murder)
Threatening with a knife – Public Order Act 1986, Section 4
Aggravated offences – where the presence/use of a knife increases sentence severity
Sentencing guidelines for knife crimes take into account the type of knife, circumstances, criminal history, and harm caused.
Detailed Case Explanations
1. R v. Ali [2017] EWCA Crim 2743
Facts: Ali was stopped by police carrying a folding knife with a 3-inch blade without any reasonable excuse. He was convicted under the Criminal Justice Act 1988, Section 139 for possession of a knife in a public place.
Outcome: The Court of Appeal upheld a custodial sentence because the defendant had a previous conviction for knife possession, and possession of a folding knife was considered particularly dangerous.
Significance: This case reinforced that repeat offenders carrying knives face custodial sentences even if no immediate harm is caused.
2. R v. Robinson [2018] EWCA Crim 2104
Facts: Robinson was convicted of section 18 wounding (wounding with intent) after stabbing a victim during a street altercation.
Outcome: The Court of Appeal reviewed the original 8-year sentence and increased it to 12 years, emphasizing the seriousness of knife offences causing grievous bodily harm and the need for deterrence.
Significance: Demonstrates that serious knife injuries often lead to long-term imprisonment, especially where intent to cause serious harm is proven.
3. R v. Kahn [2016] EWCA Crim 2245
Facts: Kahn was caught with a 9-inch kitchen knife in a public park. He claimed he was carrying it for self-defense.
Outcome: The Court rejected the self-defense argument, ruling there is no reasonable excuse for carrying a large knife in public.
Significance: Clarifies that self-defense is not generally accepted as a reasonable excuse for carrying knives in public places.
4. R v. Khan [2014] EWCA Crim 453
Facts: Khan was convicted of possessing an offensive weapon after carrying a lock knife with a blade over 3 inches. The offence took place in a public place.
Outcome: The Court imposed a sentence of 6 months imprisonment, reflecting the gravity of carrying a bladed article with a locking mechanism, which is deemed more dangerous.
Significance: Highlights that locking knives carry harsher sentences due to their increased potential lethality.
5. R v. Zain [2015] EWCA Crim 240
Facts: Zain was involved in a street fight and stabbed the victim with a non-locking knife causing serious injury.
Outcome: The defendant was sentenced to 7 years for wounding with intent.
Significance: Confirms that knife use during violent offences attracts severe custodial sentences even if the knife is non-locking.
6. R v. Evans [2019] EWCA Crim 195
Facts: Evans was charged with possession of a flick knife, which is banned in the UK under the Offensive Weapons Act 2019.
Outcome: The Court sentenced Evans to 3 years in prison, stressing the illegality of carrying prohibited knives, irrespective of use.
Significance: Emphasizes zero tolerance towards prohibited knives like flick knives or switchblades.
7. R v. Thompson [2020] EWCA Crim 110
Facts: Thompson was charged with threatening a person with a knife during a robbery.
Outcome: The Court upheld a 9-year sentence for robbery with a weapon, indicating that threatening with a knife elevates offences to a higher sentencing bracket.
Significance: Shows how the threat or use of a knife during other crimes (e.g., robbery) results in aggravated sentences.
Sentencing Guidelines Summary for Knife Crime:
| Offence | Typical Sentence Range | Aggravating Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Possession of a knife in public | Up to 4 years imprisonment | Repeat offences, locking knives, concealed |
| Wounding with intent (knife) | 5-15 years imprisonment | Severity of injury, use in gang-related crime |
| Threatening with a knife | 3-10 years | Whether the victim feared immediate violence |
| Carrying prohibited knives | 2-5 years | Type of weapon (flick knife, butterfly knife) |
| Knife-related robbery | 7-14 years | Use of the knife to threaten or cause injury |
Key Legal Principles From These Cases:
Strict liability for carrying knives in public without lawful reason.
No reasonable excuse for self-defense when carrying knives openly.
Aggravated offences involving knives lead to much harsher sentences.
Repeat offenders face longer prison terms as a deterrent.
Courts treat locking or flick knives more seriously due to their danger.
Use or threat of knives in other crimes like robbery or assault escalates sentencing.
Conclusion
The UK legal system treats knife crime with serious concern, reflected in strict laws and significant custodial sentences for possession and use. Courts focus on deterrence, public safety, and the harm caused, balancing circumstances with legislative sentencing guidelines.
RELATED Blog
0 comments