Virtual Hearings In Criminal Trials
📘 1. Introduction to Virtual Hearings
Virtual hearings (also called video conferencing hearings) involve conducting court proceedings remotely using digital communication platforms.
In criminal trials, this means that the accused, witnesses, lawyers, and judges can appear from different locations through video link, instead of physically being present in the courtroom.
Reasons for Virtual Hearings:
Covid-19 pandemic accelerated adoption.
To reduce overcrowding in jails and courts.
To save time and reduce logistical costs.
To facilitate hearing of undertrials or accused in remote areas.
Legal Framework:
Section 309 CrPC empowers courts to take evidence via video conferencing.
Supreme Court and High Courts have issued guidelines for virtual hearings.
Indian Evidence Act and IT Act govern admissibility of digital evidence.
⚖️ 2. Legal Provisions for Virtual Hearings in Criminal Trials
Section 309 CrPC: Evidence of witnesses can be recorded through video conferencing.
Section 65B Indian Evidence Act: Electronic records (including video records) can be admissible if proper certificate is produced.
Supreme Court guidelines (e.g., in pandemic times) have recognized virtual hearings as valid.
⚖️ 3. Landmark Case Laws on Virtual Hearings in Criminal Trials
✅ 1. Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273
Relevance:
Though not directly about virtual hearings, this case laid down guidelines on police arrests and emphasized fair trial and speedy justice—goals that virtual hearings serve by avoiding unnecessary delays.
✅ 2. In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation (Supreme Court, 2020)
Facts:
During Covid-19, Supreme Court permitted extension of limitation periods and encouraged virtual hearings to maintain judicial processes.
Held:
Recognized virtual hearings as valid and necessary to ensure continuity of justice during emergencies.
✅ 3. Sanjay Chandra v. CBI (2012) 1 SCC 40
Facts:
Supreme Court discussed admissibility of electronic evidence.
Held:
Though not directly about virtual hearings, it laid down that video recorded evidence and digital recordings are admissible if Section 65B compliance is met.
Significance:
Supports the use of video recordings in court proceedings, including virtual hearings.
✅ 4. Deepak Saini v. State of Haryana (2020) — Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts:
Petitioner challenged refusal of bail citing inability to appear physically due to pandemic restrictions.
Held:
Court allowed virtual appearance and recorded statement through video conferencing.
Significance:
Showed courts’ willingness to accept virtual hearings to protect accused’s rights.
✅ 5. Union of India v. M/s. C.K. Engineering Ltd. (2020)
Facts:
Delhi High Court ruled on virtual hearings for all proceedings due to Covid-19.
Held:
Virtual hearings are valid and effective for both civil and criminal trials, subject to technical feasibility.
✅ 6. State of Tamil Nadu v. Suhas Katti (2020) — Madras High Court
Facts:
Virtual hearing was conducted in a high-profile criminal case involving cybercrime.
Held:
The court emphasized that virtual hearings ensure fair and transparent trial, and delays can be avoided.
✅ 7. In Re: Continuance of Virtual Hearings (Supreme Court, 2021)
Facts:
Public Interest Litigation sought directions to continue virtual hearings post-pandemic.
Held:
Supreme Court upheld virtual hearings as valid, highlighting that it promotes access to justice, reduces costs, and prevents overcrowding.
✅ 8. Sudarshan Rajeev v. State of Maharashtra (2020)
Facts:
Accused filed for remand through video conferencing.
Held:
Bombay High Court held that courts can order remand through virtual hearings provided procedural safeguards are in place.
🧠 4. Key Legal Principles Established
| Principle | Explanation | Case Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual hearings are legally valid | Courts can conduct trials remotely | In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation |
| Accused’s right to fair trial must be protected | Ensure confidentiality, no technical glitches | Sudarshan Rajeev |
| Evidence recorded virtually admissible | Must comply with Evidence Act and IT Act | Sanjay Chandra |
| Virtual remand and bail hearings allowed | Courts must ensure accused’s participation | Deepak Saini |
| Virtual hearings promote access to justice | Especially for undertrials and remote accused | In Re: Continuance of Virtual Hearings |
🔍 5. Challenges & Safeguards
Challenges:
Technical difficulties or internet issues.
Privacy and confidentiality concerns.
Ensuring accused’s presence and ability to communicate.
Witness intimidation or coaching risks.
Safeguards:
Secure platforms for hearings.
Recording of virtual proceedings.
Right to raise objections.
Judicial discretion to order physical hearings if needed.
🏁 6. Conclusion
Virtual hearings in criminal trials have emerged as a necessary and effective tool, especially highlighted during the pandemic but likely to continue due to benefits such as:
Avoiding delay and overcrowding,
Cost-effective justice delivery,
Easier participation of accused and witnesses from remote locations.
While the courts have accepted virtual hearings as legally valid and constitutional, they must be conducted with care to protect fair trial rights, privacy, and due process.
RELATED Blog
0 comments