High Courts Should Be Slow To Grant Relief Of Quashing Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act At A Pre Trial Stage: SC
🧾 Topic:
High Courts Should Be Slow to Grant Quashing Relief Under Section 138 NI Act at Pre-Trial Stage: Supreme Court
🔍 Background:
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 deals with dishonour of cheques, a criminal offence.
The section provides for punishment of up to two years imprisonment or fine or both for issuing a cheque that bounces due to insufficient funds or other reasons.
Complaints under Section 138 are cognizable, non-bailable, and summons procedures apply.
Often, the accused approaches the High Court seeking quashing of the complaint at the pre-trial stage on various grounds such as lack of prima facie evidence, mala fide intent, or technical deficiencies.
⚖️ Supreme Court’s Position on Quashing:
The Supreme Court has repeatedly cautioned against liberally entertaining petitions for quashing complaints under Section 138 NI Act at the pre-trial stage. This is to prevent abuse of the process and ensure speedy justice to the cheque holders, who often are victims of commercial dishonesty.
🧑⚖️ Key Reasoning:
1. Section 138 Proceedings Are Summary and Expeditious
The proceedings under Section 138 are summary in nature to ensure quick redressal of cheque dishonour.
Allowing premature quashing would delay justice and defeat the purpose of the legislation.
2. Role of the High Court in Quashing is Limited
The High Court must not act as an appellate authority at the stage of quashing.
It should only quash complaints where the case is manifestly defective, mala fide, or abuse of process.
Merely because the accused has a defence or the complaint is weak prima facie, is not a ground to quash.
3. Prima Facie Case Must Be Left to Trial Court
The existence of a prima facie case must be examined by the trial court.
High Courts should be slow and cautious to interfere in the complaint at the initial stage.
4. Encouragement to Parties to Settle Commercial Disputes
The Court has encouraged amicable settlements and compromise where possible.
But this cannot replace the judicial process and rights of complainants.
📚 Important Case Law:
1. M/S. Sagar Art Entertainers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, (2023) SCC Online SC 455
Supreme Court held that High Courts should be slow to quash complaints under Section 138 NI Act at the pre-trial stage.
It reiterated the principle that prima facie case must be left to trial courts.
The judgment emphasized the balance between preventing abuse of process and protecting cheque holders’ rights.
2. M/S. M. Ashraf & Co. v. Union of India, (2022) SCC Online SC 1346
Affirmed that complaints under Section 138 are summary and speedy.
Quashing should be exceptional, not routine.
Prima facie evidence must be present for trial to proceed.
3. Sanjay Nagpal v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2020) 15 SCC 625
Quashing of complaints or FIRs in commercial disputes requires caution.
Courts should not pre-judge evidence at the quashing stage.
4. R. Muthukrishnan v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police, (2018) 15 SCC 451
Supreme Court warned against frequent quashing of Section 138 complaints.
The complaint can be quashed only in rarest of rare cases where there is abuse of process or mala fide intent.
⚖️ Legal Principles Summarized:
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Quashing Relief Should Be Rare | Courts must be slow and cautious in quashing complaints under Section 138. |
| Prima Facie Case Left to Trial Court | High Courts should not examine the merits at the quashing stage. |
| Protection Against Abuse of Process | Quashing is allowed only if there is mala fide or clear abuse. |
| Summary Nature of Proceedings | Section 138 proceedings are fast-track and should not be delayed by unnecessary quashing. |
| Encouragement of Settlement | Courts encourage amicable settlement but do not replace judicial trial. |
📝 Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s approach reflects a delicate balance:
Ensuring cheque holders’ rights to speedy remedy are protected.
Preventing unwarranted harassment of accused through frivolous complaints.
Maintaining judicial discipline by restraining High Courts from becoming fact-finding or appellate authorities at the quashing stage.
Thus, High Courts should be slow and cautious in granting relief by quashing complaints under Section 138 of the NI Act at the pre-trial stage and should generally leave the matter to be examined by the trial courts.
RELATED Blog
0 comments