Timber Theft Prosecutions
1. United States v. A & R Logging, Inc. (2007) – Washington State
Facts: A & R Logging, Inc., a timber company operating in Washington, was found harvesting large quantities of timber on public lands without the proper permits. Investigations revealed that the company falsified logging reports to conceal the volume of timber taken.
Prosecution: The U.S. Forest Service investigated and brought charges under the Lacey Act, which prohibits illegal trade in timber and plants. The charges included theft of government property and false reporting.
Outcome: A & R Logging pleaded guilty. The company paid significant fines, totaling over $1 million, and agreed to implement stricter compliance procedures. The company executives were also fined individually.
Significance: This case reinforced the applicability of the Lacey Act to logging companies misreporting timber harvests and emphasized corporate accountability for illegal logging.
2. United States v. United Timber Corp. (2010) – Oregon
Facts: United Timber Corp. harvested timber from federal lands without authorization. Inspectors discovered that the company used fake permits and falsified documents to hide the illegal logging activity.
Prosecution: Federal prosecutors charged the company and its executives with theft of government property and violations of the Lacey Act.
Outcome: The company was convicted and fined $850,000. Three executives received prison sentences ranging from 6 to 12 months for conspiracy and false record-keeping.
Significance: Demonstrated that both corporations and individual executives can face criminal liability for timber theft and related fraud.
3. United States v. Timber Wolf Logging, Inc. (2012) – Montana
Facts: Timber Wolf Logging harvested protected old-growth trees on federal land in Montana without permits, exceeding the legally allowed quota. The company tried to disguise illegal activity by mixing stolen timber with legally harvested timber.
Prosecution: Prosecutors brought charges under the Lacey Act, along with conspiracy charges for misleading federal authorities.
Outcome: The company was ordered to pay $2 million in fines and restitution for environmental damages. The owners served short prison sentences and were barred from logging on federal lands for 10 years.
Significance: Highlighted enforcement against companies that attempt to launder illegally harvested timber into legal markets.
4. United States v. Mark A. Bowden (2015) – California
Facts: Bowden, an independent logger, was caught stealing rare and valuable redwood trees from state-protected lands. The timber was then sold to private buyers for profit.
Prosecution: Charged under California state law for timber theft and federal law under the Lacey Act for selling stolen timber across state lines.
Outcome: Bowden was sentenced to 24 months in federal prison and fined $150,000. He was also required to perform community service related to forest restoration.
Significance: Demonstrated that individual loggers, not just companies, face serious federal and state consequences for timber theft.
5. United States v. Appalachian Timber Co. (2018) – Kentucky
Facts: Appalachian Timber Co. harvested timber from protected Appalachian forestlands without permits, deliberately ignoring federal restrictions. Investigators found evidence of falsified logging reports.
Prosecution: The company was prosecuted under the Lacey Act and federal conspiracy laws, as well as state timber theft laws.
Outcome: The company paid $1.5 million in fines and restitution. Two executives received prison sentences and probation.
Significance: This case emphasized federal commitment to protecting ecologically sensitive areas and holding both companies and executives accountable.
6. United States v. Green Mountain Logging (2020) – Vermont
Facts: Green Mountain Logging illegally cut timber from state-owned conservation lands, selling it to private mills while claiming it came from private property. The investigation uncovered forged land ownership documents.
Prosecution: Charges included timber theft, fraud, and violations of the Lacey Act.
Outcome: The company pled guilty, paid $900,000 in fines, and the CEO was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
Significance: This case reinforced that timber theft combined with fraudulent documentation is a serious federal crime.
Key Legal Takeaways from Timber Theft Prosecutions
Primary Laws Used:
Lacey Act (18 U.S.C. § 3371–3378) – prohibits trafficking in illegally harvested timber.
Theft of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641) – applies when timber is taken from public lands.
State timber theft laws – apply for logging on state-protected lands.
Corporate & Individual Liability: Both companies and executives/owners can face fines, prison, and restitution.
Methods Prosecuted: Illegal logging, falsifying permits, selling stolen timber, and document fraud.
Sentences: Include fines ranging from $150,000 to $2 million, imprisonment (6 months to 2 years), and restrictions on logging activities.
RELATED Blog
0 comments