Online Gambling Offences
Online Gambling Offences: Overview
Online gambling offences generally relate to illegal or unregulated betting activities conducted over the internet. Common offences include:
Operating an unlicensed online gambling platform.
Participating in unlawful betting or gaming activities.
Facilitating or promoting online gambling without necessary permissions.
Money laundering or fraud related to online gambling transactions.
Many jurisdictions have specific laws regulating online gambling, requiring licenses, imposing age restrictions, and controlling the type of games allowed.
Case 1: United States v. Scheinberg (2016) — PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker
Facts:
In this landmark case, the U.S. Department of Justice targeted major online poker sites — PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker — alleging that they violated federal laws including the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) and engaged in bank fraud and money laundering.
Key Issues:
Running online gambling operations without proper licenses.
Processing payments through banks and financial institutions despite UIGEA restrictions.
Allegations of defrauding players by withholding funds.
Court Decision:
The companies agreed to a settlement. PokerStars paid a large fine and purchased Full Tilt’s assets, taking responsibility for repaying player balances. The case set a precedent for enforcement against unlicensed online gambling in the U.S.
Case 2: R v. Benyahia (2011) — UK
Facts:
Benyahia operated an online gambling website without a UK Gambling Commission license, targeting UK customers.
Key Issues:
Violation of the Gambling Act 2005 which regulates online gambling in the UK.
Operating without a license, which is a criminal offence.
Court Decision:
The court convicted Benyahia for operating an unlawful gambling business online. This case reinforced the requirement that operators must obtain a license to legally offer gambling services to UK residents.
Case 3: People v. Ivey (2017) — California, USA
Facts:
Ivey was charged with illegal online gambling related to running a website that facilitated online betting without proper authorization.
Key Issues:
Unlicensed gambling operation.
Violation of state gambling laws, including failure to comply with anti-money laundering regulations.
Court Decision:
The court held that online gambling operators must strictly comply with licensing and regulatory frameworks. The case highlighted how state law applies to online gambling platforms, even if servers are located offshore.
Case 4: State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Rajendran (2015) — India
Facts:
Rajendran was running an online lottery and betting platform in Tamil Nadu, where online gambling laws were unclear but largely restrictive.
Key Issues:
Operation of an online lottery without government permission.
Violating public gaming laws applicable to digital platforms.
Court Decision:
The court ruled that the online lottery was illegal under existing gaming laws, emphasizing that online platforms fall under the scope of public gaming legislation. This case led to stricter scrutiny of online gambling in India.
Case 5: Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) v. Betfair (2012)
Facts:
Betfair, an online betting exchange, was accused of breaching Australian interactive gambling laws by accepting bets from Australian residents while lacking local licenses.
Key Issues:
Breach of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001.
Illegal provision of online betting services to residents.
Court Decision:
The Federal Court ruled against Betfair, confirming that companies must comply with Australian laws even if servers are offshore. The decision underscored the extraterritorial reach of Australian gambling regulations.
Summary
Licensing is key: Courts consistently uphold laws requiring operators to obtain proper licenses before offering online gambling services.
Jurisdiction matters: Even offshore operators can be subject to local laws where their customers reside.
Compliance enforcement: Regulators actively pursue cases involving unlicensed operation, fraud, and payment violations.
Public policy focus: Courts aim to protect consumers, prevent money laundering, and maintain regulatory oversight.
RELATED Blog
0 comments