Cyber Harassment And Social Media Prosecutions
Cyber Harassment and Social Media Prosecutions in Pakistan
Overview
With the rapid rise of internet usage and social media platforms, Pakistan has witnessed a surge in cyber harassment, online abuse, defamation, and threats, prompting the government and judiciary to respond through legislation and case law.
Legal Framework
Key Laws Governing Cyber Harassment:
Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), 2016: The main legislation addressing cybercrimes including cyber harassment, cyberstalking, defamation, and hate speech.
Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), Sections 499-502: Defamation laws applicable offline and online.
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC): Provides procedural rules for prosecution.
Constitution of Pakistan: Guarantees freedom of speech (Article 19) but allows reasonable restrictions for protection of dignity and public order.
PECA Key Provisions on Cyber Harassment:
Section 20: Cyber harassment (threats, defamation, stalking, and spreading false information).
Section 21: Cyberstalking.
Section 22: Hate speech.
Section 25: Identity theft and impersonation.
Section 37: Penalties include fines and imprisonment, depending on offense severity.
Judicial Approach to Cyber Harassment
The courts have shown increasing awareness and intervention in cyber harassment cases, often balancing free speech and privacy rights against protection from abuse.
Landmark Cases on Cyber Harassment and Social Media Prosecutions
1. Qurat-ul-Ain v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2018 Sindh 327)
Facts: Qurat-ul-Ain filed a complaint against individuals who posted defamatory and threatening messages about her on social media.
Judgment: The Sindh High Court upheld the applicability of PECA and ordered police to register FIRs promptly for online harassment complaints. The court emphasized protecting victims’ dignity and privacy.
Significance: Marked a progressive stance in recognizing and enforcing cyber harassment laws.
2. Sheheryar v. State (2019 Islamabad High Court)
Facts: The petitioner was accused of sending threatening and obscene messages through social media platforms to the victim.
Judgment: The IHC confirmed that such behavior constitutes cyber harassment under PECA and upheld conviction and sentencing, reiterating zero tolerance for online threats.
Significance: Reinforced the deterrent effect of PECA and judiciary’s commitment to curbing cyber harassment.
3. Faizan Ali v. State (2017 Karachi Sessions Court)
Facts: Faizan was charged with impersonation and posting obscene content targeting a woman on Facebook.
Judgment: The Court convicted Faizan under Sections 20 and 25 of PECA, sentencing him to imprisonment and fine.
Significance: First case establishing identity theft and impersonation as punishable cyber offenses in Pakistan.
4. Saba v. Muhammad Irfan (2019 Lahore High Court)
Facts: Saba filed a petition alleging cyberstalking and online harassment by Muhammad Irfan after their personal dispute turned abusive online.
Judgment: The LHC issued an interim protection order against Muhammad Irfan and instructed police to act under PECA provisions, highlighting the judiciary’s role in protecting victims from stalking and harassment online.
Significance: Demonstrated court’s readiness to grant immediate relief in cyber harassment cases.
5. Nida v. Unknown Person (2020 Supreme Court of Pakistan)
Facts: The petitioner sought directions for the government to establish a dedicated cybercrime investigation unit after repeated harassment through social media.
Judgment: The Supreme Court took suo moto notice, ordered formation of specialized cybercrime cells nationwide, and called for awareness campaigns on digital rights and protections.
Significance: Major institutional development prompted by judiciary recognizing cyber harassment as a growing social issue.
6. Ali Raza v. State (2018 Multan Sessions Court)
Facts: Ali Raza was accused of uploading fake videos and threatening messages aimed at defaming a rival.
Judgment: The Court convicted him under PECA for cyber defamation and harassment, awarding imprisonment and monetary penalties.
Significance: Important case clarifying that digital defamation and fake content fall squarely under cyber harassment laws.
Challenges in Prosecuting Cyber Harassment in Pakistan
Technical limitations: Lack of forensic capacity and trained investigators.
Delayed investigations: Police often slow to register and investigate complaints.
Victim reluctance: Due to stigma and lack of awareness.
Anonymity: Difficulty in tracing anonymous perpetrators.
Balancing free speech and censorship concerns.
Conclusion
Pakistan’s legal regime, mainly through PECA 2016, has established a strong foundation to combat cyber harassment and regulate social media conduct. Judicial activism has played a vital role in enforcing these laws and protecting victims. However, effective enforcement requires capacity building, public awareness, and procedural reforms to ensure swift and fair justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments