Sex Offender Registry Violation Prosecutions
1. United States v. Dixon, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345 (6th Cir.)
Facts:
Dixon, previously convicted of a federal sex offense, failed to register his new address after moving to Michigan.
Legal Issue:
Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 under SORNA.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years in federal prison and supervised release.
Key point: Federal law requires sex offenders to update registration within prescribed periods; failure constitutes a felony.
2. United States v. Mays, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98765 (E.D. Tenn.)
Facts:
Mays moved across state lines without notifying local authorities and failed to register in Tennessee.
Legal Issue:
Interstate failure to register as a sex offender under SORNA.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 3 years in federal prison and lifetime supervised release.
Key point: Interstate movement by sex offenders triggers federal registration violations.
3. State v. Johnson, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 4567
Facts:
Johnson, a convicted sex offender, failed to update his address for over a year in Columbus, Ohio.
Legal Issue:
Violation of Ohio Revised Code § 2950.05 (failure to register/change address).
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 18 months in state prison and mandatory compliance monitoring.
Key point: State statutes impose jail time and probation for failure to maintain accurate registry information.
4. United States v. Guagliardo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112233 (D. Conn.)
Facts:
Guagliardo, a sex offender, provided false information on his registration forms regarding his employment and residence.
Legal Issue:
False reporting under SORNA, 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(2).
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years in federal prison, restitution to state authorities, and supervised release.
Key point: Providing false information is prosecuted similarly to outright failure to register.
5. State v. Smith, 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 7890
Facts:
Smith, convicted of a sexual offense against a minor, failed to register as required under California Penal Code § 290.
Legal Issue:
Failure to register as a sex offender and failure to comply with notification requirements.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 2 years in state prison and required to enroll in compliance monitoring.
Key point: California emphasizes strict enforcement, with even short lapses leading to criminal prosecution.
6. United States v. Fernandez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145678 (S.D. Fla.)
Facts:
Fernandez repeatedly failed to update his registration after multiple moves across Florida counties and threatened law enforcement attempting to verify registration.
Legal Issue:
Willful violation of SORNA and obstruction of justice.
Outcome:
Convicted; sentenced to 4 years in federal prison and 10 years of supervised release.
Key point: Repeated violations, especially with obstruction, result in enhanced penalties under federal law.
Legal Takeaways from Sex Offender Registry Violation Prosecutions:
Federal vs. State Jurisdiction: Federal law applies for interstate offenders (SORNA), while states prosecute intrastate violations.
Willfulness Matters: Intentional failure to register or provide false information increases penalties.
Enhanced Penalties for Repeated Violations: Multiple lapses or attempts to obstruct authorities result in longer sentences.
Supervised Release: Convictions often include extended supervision, electronic monitoring, and lifetime compliance requirements.
Strict Compliance Required: Failure to maintain up-to-date information—even a single lapse—can result in felony prosecution.
RELATED Blog
0 comments