Sexual Assault Prosecutions
Overview: Sexual Assault
Sexual assault generally involves:
Non-consensual sexual contact or penetration.
Threats, coercion, or manipulation to obtain sexual activity.
Acts against minors, incapacitated persons, or adults without consent.
Relevant Laws
India: Sections 375, 376 IPC (rape and sexual assault); Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO).
UK: Sexual Offences Act 2003.
U.S.: State-specific statutes; federal law covers assaults on federal property, military, or interstate cases.
Case 1: State of Rajasthan v. Ramesh Kumar (2015, India)
Facts:
Ramesh Kumar was accused of raping a minor girl under his guardianship.
Charges:
IPC Sections 376 (rape) and 376(2)(f) (rape by person in position of trust).
POCSO Act Sections 4 and 6.
Court Findings:
Medical evidence confirmed sexual assault.
Testimonies of witnesses corroborated the victim’s account.
Verdict:
Convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Fine imposed and directed to pay compensation to the victim.
Significance:
Demonstrates strict enforcement of laws protecting minors and persons under guardianship.
Case 2: R v. Bree (2007, UK)
Facts:
Defendant engaged in sexual activity with the complainant who had voluntarily consumed alcohol. Consent was argued to be impaired.
Court Findings:
The UK Court of Appeal clarified that consent must be conscious and voluntary, and intoxication can invalidate consent.
Verdict:
Bree was convicted of rape.
Sentencing reflected the seriousness of assault while the victim was incapacitated.
Significance:
Landmark case in defining consent under intoxication, impacting later sexual assault prosecutions.
Case 3: People v. Brock Turner (2016, California, U.S.)
Facts:
Brock Turner sexually assaulted an unconscious woman behind a dumpster on a college campus.
Charges:
Sexual assault of an unconscious person
Multiple counts of felony sexual assault
Court Findings:
Victim testimony, DNA evidence, and witness statements confirmed assault.
Turner attempted to minimize accountability in court.
Verdict:
Convicted of three felony counts.
Initial sentence of 6 months in county jail sparked public outrage; later cases and policy reforms addressed sentencing guidelines.
Significance:
Highlighted issues of sentencing adequacy and sexual assault on college campuses.
Case 4: R v. A (No 2) (2001, UK House of Lords)
Facts:
Case involved a husband accused of sexual assault against his wife during marriage, challenging the historical marital rape exemption.
Court Findings:
House of Lords ruled that marital rape is criminal, overturning previous exemptions.
Consent within marriage must still be valid.
Verdict:
Conviction upheld for non-consensual sexual activity.
Significance:
Established marital rape as a prosecutable offense in UK law.
Case 5: United States v. Larry Nassar (2018, Michigan, U.S.)
Facts:
Larry Nassar, a former USA Gymnastics team doctor, sexually assaulted hundreds of young female athletes under the guise of medical treatment.
Charges:
Sexual assault of minors
Possession of child pornography
Court Findings:
Victims testified extensively; corroborated by medical and institutional records.
Nassar exploited his position of trust.
Verdict:
Sentenced to 175 years imprisonment on state charges.
Lifetime supervision and civil judgments awarded to victims.
Significance:
Showcased prosecution of serial sexual assault by authority figures and institutional accountability.
Case 6: State of Kerala v. Arun (2017, India)
Facts:
Arun was accused of gang-rape of a minor girl in his neighborhood.
Charges:
IPC Sections 376D (gang rape), 377 (unnatural offence in some contexts), and POCSO Act Sections 3 and 4.
Court Findings:
DNA evidence confirmed involvement of all accused.
Victim statements and witness corroboration supported charges.
Verdict:
All accused sentenced to life imprisonment.
Significance:
Reinforced stringent penalties for gang sexual assault under Indian law.
Case 7: R v. H (2015, UK Court of Appeal)
Facts:
A teacher sexually assaulted multiple students over several years. Allegations involved manipulation and grooming.
Court Findings:
Court examined grooming behavior as part of pattern of sexual assault.
Conviction based on multiple victim statements, corroborated by forensic evidence.
Verdict:
Sentenced to 12 years imprisonment.
Significance:
Highlighted grooming as a key element in sexual assault prosecution.
Case 8: People v. Michael Peterson (U.S., 2011)
Facts:
Peterson faced allegations of sexual assault during domestic disputes; case involved forensic investigation and circumstantial evidence.
Court Findings:
Evidence included victim testimony, forensic DNA, and prior incidents.
Jury assessed credibility and corroboration carefully.
Verdict:
Convicted of sexual assault; sentence varied based on state law.
Significance:
Demonstrated importance of forensic and testimonial corroboration in sexual assault cases.
Key Legal Principles from Sexual Assault Prosecutions
Consent is central: intoxication, coercion, or incapacity negates consent.
Authority and trust: abuse of positions (teachers, doctors) aggravates charges.
Marital rape is prosecutable: marriage does not imply automatic consent.
Evidence: victim testimony, forensic DNA, and corroborating witnesses are critical.
Penalties are severe: life imprisonment possible for gang or serial sexual assault.
RELATED Blog
0 comments